bruno-roustant commented on PR #12716: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12716#issuecomment-1779668350
Oh, the numbers are disappointing. I expected to be both a little more compact and little faster. I wonder what is the cause, the rehash threshold, the linear scan, or the multiplication itself? The benchmark is for one fst size. Often when benchmarking hash map, I saw the curve make stages when the size increased. But I doubt a stage would explain such a difference. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
