Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hmm. Sounds to me more like an argument for requiring devfs if you > use vinum. Not until vinum works equally well with devfs as without it. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second... Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second... Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second... Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second... Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second... Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Boris Popov
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Greg Lehey
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Greg Lehey