Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second part)

[Matthew Jacob]

I think I'm assuming that DEVFS will become standard. I really see it working
very very well and solving lots of problems. I have yet to really find cases
where it really *can't* work (modulo broken drivers).


> 
> > Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Hmm. Sounds to me more like an argument for requiring devfs if you
> > > use vinum.
> > 
> > Not until vinum works equally well with devfs as without it.
> 
> Har har har har har............
> 
> Almost a Catch-22... "We have to do really wierd things so vinum will work
> equally well without devfs as with it... so we can, then,.... remove all the
> wierd things we did to make vinum work equally well without devfs as with
> it"...
> 
> I think what you really meant to say was "No, we won't require devfs".
> 
> 
> 
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message