On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Jacob >writes: > > > >> Lastly make_dev_alias() is undocumented. > > Right, just like most of the rest of the kernel. > > >Really? That's a deficiency. It should be. > > Yes, ideally, yes. I'm hacking the man page now.. Feel free to correct the change.... To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Greg Lehey
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVF... Niels Chr. Bank-Pedersen
- Re: how's vinum these days with ... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: how's vinum these days ... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: how's vinum these d... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: how's vinum the... Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum the... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: how's vinum the... Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum the... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: how's vinum the... Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum the... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: how's vinum the... Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum the... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: how's vinum the... Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum the... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: how's vinum the... Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum the... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: how's vinum the... Matthew Jacob