> Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Hmm. Sounds to me more like an argument for requiring devfs if you > > > > use vinum. > > > Not until vinum works equally well with devfs as without it. > > Har har har har har............ > > Please take your sarcasm and shove it. And get acquainted with the > issue at hand before joining the discussion. I am acquainted with this issue. I actually started it with the subject above. I have been mostly reading the threads. I think you owe me an apology. -matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second... Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second... Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second... Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second... Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Boris Popov
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Greg Lehey
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Greg Lehey
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Greg Lehey