Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second part)

[Matthew Jacob]

> Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hmm. Sounds to me more like an argument for requiring devfs if you
> > use vinum.
> 
> Not until vinum works equally well with devfs as without it.

Har har har har har............

Almost a Catch-22... "We have to do really wierd things so vinum will work
equally well without devfs as with it... so we can, then,.... remove all the
wierd things we did to make vinum work equally well without devfs as with
it"...

I think what you really meant to say was "No, we won't require devfs".




To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message