In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Jacob writes: > >> Lastly make_dev_alias() is undocumented. Right, just like most of the rest of the kernel. >Really? That's a deficiency. It should be. Yes, ideally, yes. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Greg Lehey
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVF... Niels Chr. Bank-Pedersen
- Re: how's vinum these days with ... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: how's vinum these days ... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: how's vinum these d... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: how's vinum the... Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum the... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: how's vinum the... Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum the... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: how's vinum the... Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum the... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: how's vinum the... Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum the... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: how's vinum the... Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum the... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: how's vinum the... Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum the... Dag-Erling Smorgrav