On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alfred Perlstein writes: > > >What's up with devfs not gc'ing itself? Ie, after a directory > >becomes empty it seems to still exist within the devfs namespace > >instead of disappearing. > > That was a deliberate decision, removing a directory(-inode) which > might have a valid vnode is kind of a nasty thing to attempt. Err, "might" ? These things are well defined by VFS interface. -- Boris Popov http://www.butya.kz/~bp/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second... Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second... Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second... Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second... Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second... Matthew Jacob
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Boris Popov
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Greg Lehey
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Greg Lehey
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS? Greg Lehey