On 01/19/2009 12:52 PM, Ian G:
Mozilla is resolving disputes. It just hasn't said it, nor thought about how it is doing it.
Well, it's my point that I think that Mozilla doesn't, hasn't and shouldn't resolve disputes. However, continue below....
* document what's going on and improve it * back out
Neither. I'd rather would suggest procedures and rules how certain issues should to be dealt with. If this is the improvement you are seeking, than I'm with you. However I believe that it must be Mozilla/User centric to the benefit of both. This is what I believe Mozilla cares. Mozilla doesn't need to resolve disputes, it must know what to do under certain circumstances in order to protect itself and its users. Those are two different kind of things.
* having our cake and eat it too
Yes :-) Besides, why should Mozilla care beyond that?
* find ourselves in court
Well, Mozilla has a legal department and lawyers taking care of it should need arise.
Of course. All those things will happen, as long as the root isn't removed.
No, I think that's not correct. This comment is perhaps most authentic in this respect: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470897#c24
It has to get into the business in order to use that right. If it just reserves the right, and doesn't use it, no problem.
I simply don't get it...why the h*** does Mozilla have to put itself into such a position between two different parties with arbitration? All it cares is itself and its users!?
-- Regards Signer: Eddy Nigg, StartCom Ltd. Jabber: start...@startcom.org Blog: https://blog.startcom.org _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
