On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:02:51 -0400 Stephen Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My issue with the logos presented was they made solr look like a > school project instead of the powerful tool that it is. The tricked > out font or whatever just usually doesn't play well with the business > types... they want serious-looking software. First impressions are > everything. While the fiery colors are appropriate for something > named Solr, you can play with that without getting silly - take a look > at: couldn't agree more. current logo needs improvement, but I think it can be done much better... In particular thinking of small icons, print,etc... > http://www.ascsolar.com/images/asc_solar_splash_logo.gif > http://www.logostick.com/images/EOS_InvestmentingLogo_lg.gif > > (Luckily there are many businesses that do solar energy!) > > They have the same elements but with a certain simplicity and elegance. > > I know probably some people don't care if it makes the boss or client > happy, but, these are the kinds of seemingly insignificant things that Indeed - the way I see it, if you don't care either way, then you should be happy to have a professional looking one :P B _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "Caminante no hay camino, se hace camino al andar" Antonio Machado I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned.
