Hi, I would like to give it a shot. Are there any solr logo success criteria/requirements? Any hints or suggestions from community is welcomed. Just close your eyes, start dreaming and send my couple of words about what you see... I am all ears.
Also I found that the wiki mentions some genesis<http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FAQ#head-6d74c2bb4171b0908a4695cbb24acd368a29dc06>of Solar/Solr technology but still I don't understand if the relation to sun is intentional or coincidence. Regards, Lukas On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 4:08 AM, Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 09:29:30 -0700 > Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > If there is a still room for new log design for Solr and the > > > community is > > > open for it then I can try to come up with some proposal. Doing logo > > > for > > > Mahout was really interesting experience. > > > > > > > In my opinion, yes.... I'd love to see more effort put towards the > > logo. I have stayed out of this discussion since I don't really think > > any of the logos under consideration are complete. (I begged some > > friends to do two of the three logos under consideration) I would > > love to refine them, but time... oooh time. > > +1 > > If we are going to change what we have, i'd love to see some more options , > or > better quality - no offence meant , but those "logos" aren't really a huge > improvement or departure from the current one. > > I think whatever we change to we'll be wanting to use it for a long time. > > B > _________________________ > {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome > > If you find a solution and become attached to it, the solution may become > your > next problem. > > I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when > wet. > Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have > been > Warned. > -- http://blog.lukas-vlcek.com/
