In the first attempt, I used btrfs. Then I reformatted as ext4 and
retried the same installation steps. Same problems come up again. So
consider the same partman logs but with ext4 instead of btrfs as part of
my bug report.
With the grub issue, I tried installing grub to sda2 and to sdb1, but
late
** Attachment added: "syslog"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/749360/+attachment/1972985/+files/syslog
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/749360
Title:
install
** Attachment added: "partman"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/749360/+attachment/1972962/+files/partman
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/749360
Title:
installation crashed (also com
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubiquity
I just installed 11.04 beta1 via a 4GB USB, and at the end of the install
process I first got a warning (seemingly from a package-health checkup
pythonscript) which might have been about the nonfree (mp3?) plugins, that
third checkbox in the b
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: software-center
This is a suggestion against write-protected wiki page:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SoftwareCenter
Suggestion:
Question "What to do if the package is unknown?"
Quick answer: Make the search field pre-filled with the command line package
name
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: software-center
This is a suggestion against write-protected wiki page:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SoftwareCenter
Suggestion:
Question "How do we specify performance requirements? Also need to specify
progress feedback if launching is slow."
Suggestion: Lo
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: software-center
This is a bug against write-protected wiki page:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SoftwareCenter
Bug: An instruction says it's important to use the general term
"Software" in the appropriate places. A couple paragraphs later comes
"The applicatio
In powertop.c
(http://code.google.com/p/powertop/source/browse/trunk/powertop.c)
there's a message when run without root capabilities.
901: if (geteuid() != 0)
902: printf(_("PowerTOP needs to be run as root to collect enough
information\n"));
A change suggestion that would help beginner users
Talking to Arjan (of the original authors), the language change could be
done if the opinion for doing this would be strong enough, i.e. ovewcome
the nuisance of having to get new translations. It seems translations
are handled outside of the original authors' source trees.
--
make sudo suggestio
What vnc server software is used on the server side on windows?
Such ugly coloring happens to me with VNC on windows very often. I
usually blame the windows machine or a bad combination of vnc-client and
-server. VNC can renegotiate color, compression and update protocols
while being connected. I
There is a further problem with Update Manager being interactive by
default. Users learn to click to allow and install, filling in superuser
passwords, and one day (*) somebody will just create a fake update
manager to steal superuser passwords and make ubuntu-zombies. There are
several ways a fake
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
update-manager pop-under while screensaver in operation shows desktop
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440814
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Fine with me.
--
[apport] xfce4-panel crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95485
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mai
Sorry,
as I wrote originally I couldn't find a way to reproduce the problem.
Thanks for reading,
Simon
On 8/25/07, Jérôme Guelfucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
> Ubuntu better. Please answer these questions:
>
> * Is this rep
The only problem I noticed was that it says "gtk-CRITICAL", which
sounds bad. It'd be great to avoid "crying wolf" if it's no danger.
I'd be happy to fix it by conditioning that assertion so it stops
crying out about local file names, if I knew where to look for
sources.
I tried looking for source
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: mousepad
Running "mousepad z.sh", editing, saving, File-Open, choose another file
in same (home) directory and I think that's what triggered the following
error message:
(mousepad:11714): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_file_system_unix_get_parent:
assertion `g_pat
This happens to me using Thunar 0.8.0 (Xfce 4.4.0) and a folder
structure of working files. It's my old web programming work files and
probably similar as an IE temp folder with several subfolders with
several well mixed collections of small files inside.
I've been (quickly) browsing up and down a
Public bug reported:
Below is the terminal output. All lines until the core dump come at startup.
Core dump occurs after clicking "+ Add" to add something to a new compilation.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ xfburn
** Message: No existing settings file, using default settings
** Message: Using Thunar-VFS 0
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: apt
apt-get update sometimes gives rows with "Ign":
Läs:1 http://se.archive.ubuntu.com feisty Release.gpg [191B]
Ign http://se.archive.ubuntu.com feisty/main Translation-sv_SE
...
It seems that missing files (404-errors) in a repo are reported as
"Ign".
19 matches
Mail list logo
