-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003 16:44:59 -0500, Sadanapalli, Pradeep Kumar (MED, TCS) wrote:
> Yeah I am aware of that they are ofcourse the same except some
> patches..!! But clearcase officially
> supports only kernels 2.4.20-8 , 2.4.20-9&2.4.20-12.9(not avail
%% "T. Ribbrock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
tr> Errr... What do you mean "only supports upto RedHat 9 kernel
tr> 2.4.20-8"? Both 2.4.20-8 and 2.4.20-18.9 are 2.4.20
tr> kernels. They're in general the same kernel, only slightly
tr> differently patched (e.g. to backport the security fixes)
espect to vulnerabilities - any pointers to
any links or any suggestions?
Thanks in advance...
-Original Message-
From: T. Ribbrock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 4:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Serious Threats if I use RedHat Kernel - 2.4.20-8
On Thu, Jul 10
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 12:49:25PM -0500, Sadanapalli, Pradeep Kumar (MED, TCS) wrote:
> I am forced to use the kernel version 2.4.20-8 which comes with
> default installation of RedHat 9. Whereas the latest version of the
> kernel for RedHat 9 is 2.4.20-18.9 . But as clearcase 5.0 only
> supports
I am forced to use the kernel version 2.4.20-8 which comes with default
installation
of RedHat 9. Whereas the latest version of the kernel for RedHat 9 is
2.4.20-18.9 .
But as clearcase 5.0 only supports upto RedHat 9 kernel 2.4.20-8 , I am
forced to
live with that kernel.
So I am just wondering a
Is it possible to recompile the kernel using the Intel
compiler? If so, has anyone successfully done it
where a performance gain was realized?
Thanks,
...Robert
__
Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
http://www.hotjobs.com
--
Hi all
I'm trying to build an nfs-root kernel for my diskless workstation.
I have all the latest updates for RH7.3 but the build fails:-
[root@slaptop linux-2.4]# make dep clean && make bzImage
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.18-5'
kallsyms pass 1
ld -m elf_i386
Goto this website...
http://jgo.local.net/LinuxGuide/linux-kernel.html
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>I trying to replace my old kernel which is 2.4.7-10 to 2.4.17, I have it
> download and I did complie it. I am looking for easy of doing it, I when to
> the How-to's and Redhat website and I have no idea how to replace the old
> with the new
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 12:08:30PM -0500, Jonathan M. Slivko wrote:
> Linux www.voyageri.net 2.4.17-grsec-1.9.3a #4 Tue Jan 22 14:37:55 EST
> 2002 i686 unknown
>
> I've been running that kernel for about 4 months with no problems
> whatsoever. What's not to trust about it?
Just because it works
t Office Box 250167
http://www.voyageri.net ... . .. New York, NY 10025, U.S.A.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 12:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 2.4.9 the basis of t
Dave Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > From: Dan Stromberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > For Pete's sake, why 2.4.9? Please don't tell me Redhat is trying to
> > avoid the new VM? I'm more than a little tired of the old VM swapping
> > me into a oblivion. I've put off buying a new harddisk t
Dan Stromberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For Pete's sake, why 2.4.9? Please don't tell me Redhat is trying to
> avoid the new VM?
The kernel developers don't trust it.
>
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMA
Where are the rawhide rpms for download?
I have only found SRPMS.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 2.4.9 the basis of the new redhat kernel patch?
> From: Dan Stromberg <
One of my main reasons for using RedHat was their approach to QA,
especially on the kernel side. I applaud them for sticking with a working
kernel rather than going through the vm-of-the-week cycle that Linus is
putting the Linux community through.
Jon
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Dave Reed wrote:
> >
> From: Dan Stromberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> For Pete's sake, why 2.4.9? Please don't tell me Redhat is trying to
> avoid the new VM? I'm more than a little tired of the old VM swapping
> me into a oblivion. I've put off buying a new harddisk to get more
> swapspace, because I figured the new
For Pete's sake, why 2.4.9? Please don't tell me Redhat is trying to
avoid the new VM? I'm more than a little tired of the old VM swapping
me into a oblivion. I've put off buying a new harddisk to get more
swapspace, because I figured the new VM would be in a kernel patch next
time there was a
Jeff Bearer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there any place to find information on when RedHat expects to have
> future versions ready?
No.
> I need to move to a dell supported version to get support and I'm
> wondering that redhat is working on, or if I should just go get my own
> version.
Is there any place to find information on when RedHat expects to have
future versions ready?
I need to move to a dell supported version to get support and I'm
wondering that redhat is working on, or if I should just go get my own
version. Currently they support 2.4.10
--
Jeff Bearer, RHCE
Web
anic: VFS: unable to mount root from 09:01
> oops! md1 not running, giving up!
> Bad md_map in ll_rw_block
> EXT2-fs unable to read super block.
> Invalid session number or type of track
>
> Today I solved this problem with compiling redhat kernel source code
> (2.2.16
md_map in ll_rw_block
EXT2-fs unable to read super block.
Invalid session number or type of track
Today I solved this problem with compiling redhat kernel source code
(2.2.16-22 kernel) with raid, aic7xxx drivers as modules and making initrd.
As redhat kernel source code supports autodetecting raid
CTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 4:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RedHat Kernel 2.2.16-3
>
> Hey there,
>
> Has anyone had any trouble recompiling the kernel that RedHat has
> released 2.2.16-3. I tried rebuilding the kernel and I get the error
> message
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 06:40:54PM -0400, Ray Curtis wrote:
> > "kw" == Kevin Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> kw> Hey there,
> kw> Has anyone had any trouble recompiling the kernel that RedHat has
> kw> released 2.2.16-3. I tried rebuilding the kernel and I get the error
> kw> message m
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Ray Curtis wrote:
> > "kw" == Kevin Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> kw> Hey there,
> kw> Has anyone had any trouble recompiling the kernel that RedHat has
> kw> released 2.2.16-3. I tried rebuilding the kernel and I get the error
> kw> message missing 'linux/errno
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Kevin Wood wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> Has anyone had any trouble recompiling the kernel that RedHat has
> released 2.2.16-3. I tried rebuilding the kernel and I get the
> error message missing 'linux/errno.h'. It almost seems like stuff
> was moved around.
This bit me this w
> "kw" == Kevin Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
kw> Hey there,
kw> Has anyone had any trouble recompiling the kernel that RedHat has
kw> released 2.2.16-3. I tried rebuilding the kernel and I get the error
kw> message missing 'linux/errno.h'. It almost seems like stuff was moved
kw> around
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 4:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RedHat Kernel 2.2.16-3
Hey there,
Has anyone had any trouble recompiling the kernel that RedHat has
released 2.2.16-3. I tried rebuilding the kernel and I get the error
message missing 'linux/er
Hey there,
Has anyone had any trouble recompiling the kernel that RedHat has
released 2.2.16-3. I tried rebuilding the kernel and I get the error
message missing 'linux/errno.h'. It almost seems like stuff was moved
around.
Just for information, I am using the RedHat config and the only chan
within the INSTALL.awe file in the
>awe driver update package.. it says that if your installing the patch on a
>Redhat kernel based system u need to apply a different instalation patch
>than if u were installing it on a standard kernel :\
>
>So.. 2 questions really..
>
>1: Can I use
ile in the
awe driver update package.. it says that if your installing the patch on a
Redhat kernel based system u need to apply a different instalation patch
than if u were installing it on a standard kernel :\
So.. 2 questions really..
1: Can I use a standard kernel on my RH5 box? (if not, why a
30 matches
Mail list logo
