Sounds like rather than looking at logs you want a monitoring tool. I
would then suggest you look at nagios (www.nagios.org) or bigbrother.
Both have plugins or modules to check if ntp is running .
Atif Malik
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 16:26, Bret Hughes wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 11:14, Genti Hi
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 11:14, Genti Hila wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have an Linux Box that acts as an NTP (network time protocol) server and i would
> like to sent the critical logs, especially if the ntpd daemon stops.
>
> Can anybody give some directions on that ?
>
> Any idea is appreciated
>
> G
You can use either logrotate or logwatch. Since most log files grow
quickly over time I would suggest using logwatch. It only mails you the
parts which are not caught by your rules.
Atif
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 12:14, Genti Hila wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have an Linux Box that acts as an NTP (networ
Title: Message
try
man logrotate
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Genti HilaSent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 10:15
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: email critical logs
to me
Hello,
I have an Linux Box that acts as
Ed Wilts pravi:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:09:51AM +0200, Sasa Stupar wrote:
Ed Wilts pravi:
Following up my post, it appears like the sendmail rpm update got me.
The easy fix:
# service MailScanner status
You'll see that it's not running properly
# service MailScanner stop
# se
On Monday, Sep 22nd 2003 at 09:25 -0700, quoth Simran Hansrai:
=>
=>--040605030502010208030107
=>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
=>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
=>
=>Yup,
=>
=>I have been adding rules to sendmail all day yesterday and today
=>blocking the s
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:09:51AM +0200, Sasa Stupar wrote:
> Ed Wilts pravi:
>
> >Following up my post, it appears like the sendmail rpm update got me.
> >The easy fix:
> ># service MailScanner status
> >You'll see that it's not running properly
> ># service MailScanner stop
> ># ser
Ed Wilts pravi:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:55:52PM -0500, Ed Wilts wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:07:12PM -0500, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
I'm still trying to find the time to figured out why neither f-prot nor
MailScanner is catching these. They've caught other stuff but not this
one.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:55:52PM -0500, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:07:12PM -0500, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
> > > >I'm still trying to find the time to figured out why neither f-prot nor
> > > >MailScanner is catching these. They've caught other stuff but not this
> > > >one. T
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 01:18, Michael S. Dunsavage wrote:
> Is the list getting spam that seem to be from MS or is just me?
>
> http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2003_09_18_index.html#106391450131362240
> --
> Michael S. Dunsavage
Spam does seem to be getting through to the tightest of system
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:07:12PM -0500, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
> > >I'm still trying to find the time to figured out why neither f-prot nor
> > >MailScanner is catching these. They've caught other stuff but not this
> > >one. The attachement has a .exe extension which I block by default, and
erry Doris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 3:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EMail virus?
Benjamin J. Weiss pravi:
What are the subject lines? I'm curious if we're talking about the same
email
Ben
we are talking about mail that looks
Benjamin J. Weiss pravi:
I have updater running every hour...you are lucky, you still didn't
receive these strange messages which are not detected by any av program.
What are the subject lines? I'm curious if we're talking about the same
email
Ben
we are talking about mail th
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 3:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EMail virus?
> Benjamin J. Weiss pravi:
>>What are the subject lines? I'm curious if we're talking about the same
>>email
>>
>>Ben
>>
> we are talking about mail t
> Benjamin J. Weiss pravi:
>>What are the subject lines? I'm curious if we're talking about the same
>>email
>>
>>Ben
>>
> we are talking about mail that looks like very convincing message from
> MS with an exe file attached. Subject are different: Latest net update,
> Security patch for MS, e
> >>I have updater running every hour...you are lucky, you still didn't
> >>receive these strange messages which are not detected by any av program.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >What are the subject lines? I'm curious if we're talking about the same
> >email
> >
> >Ben
> >
> we are talking about mail that
Benjamin J. Weiss pravi:
Are you guys updating your f-prot virus signatures? My f-prot is
catching
all of this stuff. My dates are:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# f-prot -verno
F-PROT ANTIVIRUS
Program version: 4.2.1
Engine version: 3.13.4
VIRUS SIGNATURE FILES
SIGN.DEF created 18 Septem
> >Are you guys updating your f-prot virus signatures? My f-prot is
catching
> >all of this stuff. My dates are:
> >
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# f-prot -verno
> >F-PROT ANTIVIRUS
> >Program version: 4.2.1
> >Engine version: 3.13.4
> >
> >VIRUS SIGNATURE FILES
> >SIGN.DEF created 18 September 2003
Benjamin J. Weiss pravi:
I have been adding rules to sendmail all day yesterday and today
blocking the spam...
I'm still trying to find the time to figured out why neither f-prot nor
MailScanner is catching these. They've caught other stuff but not this
one. The attachement has a .exe e
> >>I have been adding rules to sendmail all day yesterday and today
> >>blocking the spam...
> >
> >I'm still trying to find the time to figured out why neither f-prot nor
> >MailScanner is catching these. They've caught other stuff but not this
> >one. The attachement has a .exe extension which
Ed Wilts pravi:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 09:25:53AM -0700, Simran Hansrai wrote:
I have been adding rules to sendmail all day yesterday and today
blocking the spam...
I'm still trying to find the time to figured out why neither f-prot nor
MailScanner is catching these. They've caught othe
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 09:25:53AM -0700, Simran Hansrai wrote:
>> I have been adding rules to sendmail all day yesterday and today
blocking the spam...
>
> I'm still trying to find the time to figured out why neither f-prot nor
MailScanner is catching these. They've caught other stuff but not t
> Yup,
>
> I have been adding rules to sendmail all day yesterday and today
> blocking the spam...
>
> --
> Simran H.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.chamkila.org
It's much easier to add a virus scanner. I suggest you look at
MailScanner plus a scanner like F-Prot or ClamAV (or both!). The
MicroSoft m
My newly-installed Mailscanner/f-prot combo is catching all of the Swen.A
virii hitting my server today. They aren't showing up as spam, however.
Ben
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Wilts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 22
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 09:25:53AM -0700, Simran Hansrai wrote:
> I have been adding rules to sendmail all day yesterday and today
> blocking the spam...
I'm still trying to find the time to figured out why neither f-prot nor
MailScanner is catching these. They've caught other stuff but not this
Yup,
I have been adding rules to sendmail all day yesterday and today blocking
the spam...
--
Simran H.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.chamkila.org
Didier Casse wrote:
Everybody is being spammed!
regards,
Didier
---
PhD student
Singapore Synchrotron Light Source (SSLS)
5 Research Link,
Singa
Everybody is being spammed!
regards,
Didier
---
PhD student
Singapore Synchrotron Light Source (SSLS)
5 Research Link,
Singapore 117603
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://ssls.nus.edu.sg
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Michael S. Dunsavage wrote:
> Is the list getting spam
At 11:52 9/11/2003 -0400, you wrote:
I'm pretty much still a newbie to Linux. How can I, in this case in RH 7.3,
check to be sure email is going out from a machine?
Simplest solution, requiring no technical knowledge whatsoever, is to send
mail to one of your accounts which is on another system. F
Check /var/log/maillog
Are you using sendmail or postfix?
Leonard
Automatically inserted lawyer supplied confidentiality agreement
follows
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/11/03 11:52AM >>>
I'm pretty much still a newbie to Linux. How can I, in this case in RH
7.3,
check to be sure email is going out
> -Original Message-
> From: Bailo, John
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:24 AM
> Subject: email works to domain but not to IP address
>
>
> For a redhat 7.3 that has been set up as a sendmail server.
>
> Mail sent to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] arrives just fine.
>
> BUT
>
> Mail sent to
Why would you want it to? I suspect, if such could work, the IP would have to
be in the list of local domains.
<>
-- Original Message ---
From: "Bailo, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 08:23:35 -0700
Subject: email work
Apparently my /var dir was full.
benoBen Ocean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi;
My email server (qmail) has been running without any problems for quite some time when all of a sudden it's not processing email and I don't understand why. The following:
#ps wax|grep qmail 604 ? SW 0:00 s
On 02-Apr-2003/09:44 +0500, "Hussain Akbar (Khi)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I just signed up for this list yesterday and my mailbox is filling up
>faster than I can delete. Is there a way to access this list using a
>Newreader?
No, but you can set your subscription to "digest". Then the system w
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 04:32:27PM -0800, James D. Parra wrote:
> I would like to build an Linux e-mail server that can forward all incoming
> e-mail to accounts, roughly 100, on an Exchange 5.5 server. Also, I would
> want to have e-mail scanned for Spam and viruses, if possible.
This is fairly b
Bryan H wrote:
One other piece of informaion, it works fine on my home netowrk when I'm
plugged in at home, but when I'm on travel using the NetZero dialup it
doesn't work Thanks.
NetZero is probably blocking outgoing connections to port 25.
They do this to stop spammers from using their
Joe Giles wrote:
WOW.. I'm surprised that no one (Till Now) mentioned qmail :-P
I use that and find it quite easy to use and secure.
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 17:30, Eric Brophy wrote:
I am trying to set-up an email server but since I am new to Linux, I have no
idea which one is the best. Any ideas
I would second (or is it 3rd now) that motion. I've used sendmail and
webmin and it makes for easy configuration. I also run pop as well.
Additionally, I've added OpenWebmail. This is a fork of the Neomail
package and is very robust. The install is very straight forward and you
can easily set it up
One other point about qmail - its not an open source license.
it could go away at anytime or support for it can be shut off
by the license owner because of the terms in the license he
is distributing qmail under. There is currently no indication
that he intends to turn qmail off but his license d
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 04:15:45AM -0800, Michael Mansour wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just have a query with the following:
>
> > > - can be configured for SMTP authentication -- if
> > used with included
> > > pop3 server pop3 auth can add IP address to
> > allowed smtp relayhosts
> > > (cron cleans rel
Hi,
I just have a query with the following:
> > - can be configured for SMTP authentication -- if
> used with included
> > pop3 server pop3 auth can add IP address to
> allowed smtp relayhosts
> > (cron cleans relay hosts later)
>
> Courier doesn't do "pop before smtp", but it does
> support aut
A 16:30 25/03/2003 -0800, vous avez écrit :
>I am trying to set-up an email server but since I am new to Linux, I have no
>idea which one is the best. Any ideas?
I definetely recommand qmail
its minimum config holds in a one-line file
- * - * - * - * - * - * -
Bien sûr q
Mark Johnson-Barbier wrote:
I'm a qmail fan so I'll outline some things I like about qmail that may
be features that would help meet your needs:
I'm a courier fan, so I'll outline why I prefer it to qmail.
http://www.courier-mta.org/
- secure
- fast
Courier is these as well, and is designed very si
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 13:48, Michael Mansour wrote:
> I used to use qmail many years ago, and really loved
> it back then (I know hotmail still uses it for their
> outbound mail, they've been using it for years on
> FreeBSD).
(If only most of the Microsoft-Marketed world knew that little bit of
in
Joe Giles wrote:
Possibly, I haven't looked into other ones since I went to qmail. Maybe
there isn't allot of development on it cause there doesn't need to be
any.
In my opinion, there does. The only remaining site that I deployed
qmail on has problems with it on a regular, semi-frequent basis (i
I'm a qmail fan so I'll outline some things I like about qmail that may
be features that would help meet your needs:
- secure
- fast
- several options for user setup (/etc/passwd, mysql, vpopmail, etc.)
- includes pop3 daemon - or you can use another
- can be configured for SMTP authentication --
I used to use qmail many years ago, and really loved
it back then (I know hotmail still uses it for their
outbound mail, they've been using it for years on
FreeBSD).
But recently when I did a full upgrade of my
environment from old Linux releases, I abandoned qmail
and just went for a simpler mana
Possibly, I haven't looked into other ones since I went to qmail. Maybe
there isn't allot of development on it cause there doesn't need to be
any. No need to make changes to a system that works well... If you need
different functionality, just add an add on (There are tons) to qmail
and edit some f
>Are you speaking about the mailing list software or is this really a
>mail server ?
>
> Aly.
>
>
I am trying to set a server up for a small hosting service, so I will need
to able to handle multiple users over multiple domains. The only access that
will be needed is POP3/SMTP and I have my
Are you speaking about the mailing list software or is this really a
mail server ?
Aly.
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 17:50, irwin wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 March 2003 04:30 pm, you wrote:
> > I am trying to set-up an email server but since I am new to Linux, I have
> > no idea which one is the bes
I feel that the development on Qmail is stagnent, where as the other
mail systems seem to have active development.
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 11:56, Joe Giles wrote:
> WOW.. I'm surprised that no one (Till Now) mentioned qmail :-P
>
> I use that and find it quite easy to use and secure.
>
>
> On T
Actually, I did notice one other person.. Sorry :)
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 11:56, Joe Giles wrote:
> WOW.. I'm surprised that no one (Till Now) mentioned qmail :-P
>
> I use that and find it quite easy to use and secure.
>
>
> On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 17:30, Eric Brophy wrote:
> > I am trying to se
WOW.. I'm surprised that no one (Till Now) mentioned qmail :-P
I use that and find it quite easy to use and secure.
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 17:30, Eric Brophy wrote:
> I am trying to set-up an email server but since I am new to Linux, I have no
> idea which one is the best. Any ideas?
>
> Eric
>
Exim mail server works extremely well http://www.exim.org, and is easy
to master.
Aly.
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 18:10, Ralph Guzman wrote:
> Try http://www.postfix.org/
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Eric Brophy
> Sent: Tuesday, Ma
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 04:30:12PM -0800, Eric Brophy wrote:
> I am trying to set-up an email server but since I am new to Linux, I have no
> idea which one is the best. Any ideas?
Hi Eric,
What do you intend to use your email server (email service?), for?
1. Web browser based email client a
None are the best, but all are really good.
I use Postfix for SMTP, CourierIMAP for POP3/IMAP and LDAP for user
management and Procmail for filtering. Others like Sendmail for SMTP, some
like QMail. I don't think anyone really likes UW-IMAP as a POP3/IMAP
server, but I could be wrong. I also lik
Try Postfix.
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Brophy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 7:30 PM
Subject: Email Server
> I am trying to set-up an email server but since I am new to Linux, I have
no
> idea which one is the best. Any ideas?
>
> Eric
>
On Tuesday 25 March 2003 04:30 pm, you wrote:
> I am trying to set-up an email server but since I am new to Linux, I have
> no idea which one is the best. Any ideas?
>
> Eric
I run mailman.Quite satisfied.
Irwin
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://li
Eric Brophy wrote:
I am trying to set-up an email server but since I am new to Linux, I have no
idea which one is the best. Any ideas?
Eric
Depends on what you want to do with it.
How many users,
Do they have shell accounts?
Do you want imap, pop, smtp, webmail, MAPI?
Do you want sp
Try http://www.postfix.org/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Eric Brophy
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 4:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Email Server
I am trying to set-up an email server but since I am new to Linux, I
have no idea wh
L PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe Polk
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 3:27 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: email
>
>
> Well, there is still some missing info. Are you on a static IP from your
> ISP? If not, do you have any kinda dyn
exactly, that's what i checked, *there is no* host under that name,
it is a subdomain. It may be a resolver problem not a mail problem.
raymundo
Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Joel Lopez wrote:
mailer=esmtp, pri=30354, relay=libraries.claremont.edu. [134.173.134.2],
dsn=4.0.0, st
bruary 13, 2003 4:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: email
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Joel Lopez wrote:
> mailer=esmtp, pri=30354, relay=libraries.claremont.edu. [134.173.134.2],
> dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection refused by libraries.claremont.edu.
Seems pretty clear that libraries.c
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Joel Lopez wrote:
> mailer=esmtp, pri=30354, relay=libraries.claremont.edu. [134.173.134.2],
> dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection refused by libraries.claremont.edu.
Seems pretty clear that libraries.claremont.edu is refusing your SMTP
connections for some reason. You can
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 3:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: email
There are several things you can check:
- is sendmail daemon running?
- check /var/log/messages for clues
- MX record is needed only to receive email without hostname,
just domainname on the envelope
this for now
>
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe Polk
> > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 3:27 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: email
> >
> >
> > Well, there is st
]
Subject: Re: email
There are several things you can check:
- is sendmail daemon running?
- check /var/log/messages for clues
- MX record is needed only to receive email without hostname,
just domainname on the envelope
this for now post some more information like the output
of:
ps -axp | grep 25
nfig file is set to the defaul settings.
thanks,
Joel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Todd A. Jacobs
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 2:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: email
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Joel Lopez wrote:
I've bee
I am using a static ip.
I think I do have an mx record but since my email isn't working I'm not
sure.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe Polk
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 3:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: em
gt; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Todd A. Jacobs
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 2:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: email
>
>
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Joel Lopez wrote:
>
> > I've been trying to get email working on my m
There are several things you can check:
- is sendmail daemon running?
- check /var/log/messages for clues
- MX record is needed only to receive email without hostname,
just domainname on the envelope
this for now post some more information like the output
of:
ps -axp | grep 25
this should sho
eferred: Connection refused by libraries.claremont.edu.
The daemon is running and my config file is set to the defaul settings.
thanks,
Joel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Todd A. Jacobs
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 2:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Joel Lopez wrote:
> I've been trying to get email working on my machine but can't seem to
> get it going. I was able to send for a day but I'm not sure what I
> changed.
That's exceptionally vague. What email package? What do your logs say? Is
the daemon running? What do yo
On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 12:44, Andy wrote:
> I understand what you are saying. But I want to learn Qmail and that
> is the MTA I am setting up on my other server.
As great as Qmail is made out to be, you'll probably find life with
Courier to be much more pleasant:
http://www.courier-mta.org/
You
oops!! That should have read...
That will work... On your sendmail server:
1) add newdomain.com to /etc/mail/mailertable file.
newdomain.com esmtp:[192.168.1.200]
2) Then rebuild mailertable database by typing "make"
3) add newdomain.com to /etc/mail/relay-domains
4) restart sendmail
5) D
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 3:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: email server with private 192.168.1.200 address
>
>
> >On Saturday 25 January 2003 12:04, Buck wrote:
> > Am I
>On Saturday 25 January 2003 12:04, Buck wrote:
> Am I correct in understanding that you want the email servers in a
> closed network for testing and educational use only rather than for
> connection through the internet?
No. I want this to be a real live email, pop, imap, smtp server.
The chall
, 2003 3:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: email server with private 192.168.1.200 address
> FWIW: I have 3 registered domains -- all pointing to a single public
IP on
> my linux/iptables based firewall. My sendmail server sits behind this
> firewall (in a DMZ) with a private IP a
> FWIW: I have 3 registered domains -- all pointing to a single public IP on
> my linux/iptables based firewall. My sendmail server sits behind this
> firewall (in a DMZ) with a private IP address. I use iptables to port
> forward tcp/25 to this dmz server. I just configure sendmail to handle
> vir
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy
> Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 1:27 PM
> Subject: email server with private 192.168.1.200 address
>
> My main server is a Redhat box running Sendmail with a public
> IP and is a router and dhcp server for my private network.
> It is running iptables fi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05-Dec-2002/11:11 +1000, Ze Ji Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 5 Dec 2002, Ze Ji Li wrote:
>>
>>> Anyone know how to create automatic signatures base on the destination
>>> of the email? Basically, one signature for emails going to .hawaii.edu
On 5 Dec 2002, Ze Ji Li wrote:
> Anyone know how to create automatic signatures base on the destination
> of the email? Basically, one signature for emails going to .hawaii.edu
> and another one for outside of .hawaii.edu? Thank you.
Set up roles in pine. Use one for internal emails, and anothe
On 05 Dec 2002 10:03:05 +1000
Ze Ji Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anyone know how to create automatic signatures base on the destination
> of the email? Basically, one signature for emails going to
> .hawaii.edu and another one for outside of .hawaii.edu? Thank you.
I don't know what
Hmm..with evolution? pine?
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 10:25, David Kramer wrote:
> On 5 Dec 2002, Ze Ji Li wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Anyone know how to create automatic signatures base on the destination
> > of the email? Basically, one signature for emails going to .hawaii.edu
> > and another one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ze Ji Li wrote:
| Hi,
|
| Anyone know how to create automatic signatures base on the destination
| of the email? Basically, one signature for emails going to .hawaii.edu
| and another one for outside of .hawaii.edu? Thank you.
|
Might be helpful if
On 5 Dec 2002, Ze Ji Li wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anyone know how to create automatic signatures base on the destination
> of the email? Basically, one signature for emails going to .hawaii.edu
> and another one for outside of .hawaii.edu? Thank you.
With which email application?
-
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
11/07/2002 at 01:22 PM,
"Paul Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>A note on the legal side of the monitoring ... all employees know that
>the mail is monitored and have signed computer use forms to this extent.
>It is done not necessarily to police our employees but rathe
Hello Paul,
Thursday, November 7, 2002, 2:46:30 PM, you textually orated:
PL> For security reasons, our network administrator currently receives a copy of
PL> EVERY incoming and outgoing email to/from our office. We are in the process
PL> of phasing in a RH8/Sendmail server and need to know what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Paul Lee posted the following:
PL>For security reasons, our network administrator currently receives a copy of
PL>EVERY incoming and outgoing email to/from our office. We are in the process
PL>of phasing in a RH8/Sendmail server an
: Thursday, November 07, 2002 3:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Email monitoring
One of the sendmail folks should definitely give this guy the technical
answer, but I also wanted to pipe up and mention that the original poster
should *definitely* check with his legal department and make
I can't speak for Sendmail, but in Postfix, there is an option to BCC
every incoming/outgoing message to a particular address.
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Paul Lee wrote:
> For security reasons, our network administrator currently receives a copy of
> EVERY incoming and outgoing email to/from our office
One of the sendmail folks should definitely give this guy the technical
answer, but I also wanted to pipe up and mention that the original poster
should *definitely* check with his legal department and make sure that the
company is not violating the Electronic Communications Privacy Act by
doing th
From: "Paul Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For security reasons, our network administrator currently receives a copy
of
> EVERY incoming and outgoing email to/from our office. We are in the
process
> of phasing in a RH8/Sendmail server and need to know what is the best way
to
> implement this policy o
On 29 Aug 2002 08:12:16 -0500, Roger wrote:
>Have any recommendations for a web based client? I have a NT box running
>Imail ver 6.06 in which the web based messaging system is getting flaky.
>Anyway..The backend of the product actual works very well pop3, imap.
>Looking for a web based messagin
have you heard of Sqwebmail !!!
try it !!!
Horde is very nice
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Schmeits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:12 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: email thru browser
>
>
> Have any recommendations for a web based clie
Also, I use Ximian Evolution on the server and then about 300 users
connect up using X-Win32 and pull mail inside my network. This works
pretty well, no real worries with this setup. Its kinda nice to have a
centrally managed mail system. Each user has a local account on the
server and a home fold
I use Popper_mod. It is an Outlook clone and used mysql. Very nicely
done and well supported.Feature packed also. Create and manage your own
folders and address book. Check it out. Here is the url. Its free and is
PHP based, so it is very secure.
http://www.symatec-computer.com
Let me know if y
Horde is very nice
-Original Message-
From: Roger Schmeits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: email thru browser
Have any recommendations for a web based client? I have a NT box running
Imail ver 6.06 in which the web based
If you compile php into apache and want a very expandable webmail client
then try
http://www.squirrelmail.org/
I seem to remember it only runs IMAP though and no pop
Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Roger Schmeits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 August 2002 14:12
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Aly Dharshi wrote:
> mentioned previously are an issue to me, I find Exim a decent easy to
> configure, small, fast and feature-ful application. Its is the default
> on Debian although I feel that RedHat ought to include it in their
> distro, I am quite for it.
They do. I
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Aly Dharshi wrote:
> I think that Qmail maybe secure but its a stagnant application. It has to
> be patched to get various things to work, I don't know about Postfix its
> used by a number of persons, when I looked at it last when choosing
> there wasn't any LDAP fea
1 - 100 of 243 matches
Mail list logo
