On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:55:52PM -0500, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:07:12PM -0500, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
> > > >I'm still trying to find the time to figured out why neither f-prot nor
> > > >MailScanner is catching these. They've caught other stuff but not this
> > > >one. The attachement has a .exe extension which I block by default, and
> > > >not even the attachment is getting stripped.
> > > >
> > > >Is anybody/everybody else seeing this make it through
> > > >MailScanner/f-prot?
>
> I think I may have just figured it out. After the sendmail patch came out,
> sendmail was automatically being restarted when it should not have been
> - it should have been kicked off from MailScanner. I'll see if this
> clears things up any. At the rate they've been coming in, I should know
> in an hour or less.
Following up my post, it appears like the sendmail rpm update got me.
The easy fix:
# service MailScanner status
You'll see that it's not running properly
# service MailScanner stop
# service MailScanner start
You'll see that it's now right.
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
