nmtc wrote:
> Can Redhat8 use usb adsl lan modem?
> My modem is e-tek usb adsl td-2002,and i can't find driver .
check out this link -> http://www.idir.net/~gromitkc/usblist.html
--
<>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux
Well,
I don't have a USB DSL connection, but I do have SBC/Yahoo DSL that uses
PPPOe. I use Smoothwall GPL. You can check their site to see if the USB
modem is supported.
Mark
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 12:34, Info wrote:
> How do i install an USB ADSL Modem? And how do i make it dial to my
> ISP and
> Could one of you experts please tell me how to install an Alcatel USB
modem on
> Red Hat 8. I know it can be done as I have seen it in action and the
Alcatel
> site provides linux drivers for download.
>
> Not sure on how to proceed after downloading the driver.
Not enough information to help yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hossein S. Zadeh wrote:
>On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Thomas Ribbrock wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 08:03:26AM -0400, John Aldrich wrote:
>> > I'm anticipating the usual "RedHat" bloat. ;-) I've got to
>> > confess I've never TRIED to install a minimal system, so
On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Thomas Ribbrock wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 08:03:26AM -0400, John Aldrich wrote:
> > I'm anticipating the usual "RedHat" bloat. ;-) I've got to
> > confess I've never TRIED to install a minimal system, so I
> > don't know if it can be done. I've heard that you can do it
On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 08:03:26AM -0400, John Aldrich wrote:
> I'm anticipating the usual "RedHat" bloat. ;-) I've got to
> confess I've never TRIED to install a minimal system, so I
> don't know if it can be done. I've heard that you can do it
> with 3-500 megs...
Well, you could always try on
John Aldrich wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Apr 2001, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> >
> > 1-2G drive for a firewall? I have a RH 6.2 firewall system with 210M
> > including 34M for swap. It would not need to be that bit but it also
> > serves out a couple of WEB pages, and filters mail.
> >
> > 103M used o
On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, John Aldrich wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Apr 2001, John Aldrich wrote:
>
> Besides...where're you gonna find a 500 meg hard drive
> these days??? ;-)
> John
>
My junk box. Also, Computer Geeks, if you don't mind used hardware.
Mikkel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
>Don't joke... I just found an old PS/2 (486/33, 8MB, 320MB) that I'm going
>to set up as my home firewall. I just have to find a way to make it to 32MB
>RAM...
I can top it ... PS/2e ,486SX/25, 8M, 100M with Red Hat 6. It won't
even ru
On Sun, 08 Apr 2001, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> >Besides...where're you gonna find a 500 meg hard drive
> >these days??? ;-)
> > John
>
> Don't joke... I just found an old PS/2 (486/33, 8MB, 320MB) that I'm going
> to set up as my home firewall. I just have to find a way to make it to 32MB
At 4/8/01 08:30 AM -0400, you wrote:
>On Sun, 08 Apr 2001, John Aldrich wrote:
> > On Sun, 08 Apr 2001, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> > >
> > > 1-2G drive for a firewall? I have a RH 6.2 firewall system with 210M
> > > including 34M for swap. It would not need to be that bit but it also
> > > ser
At 4/7/01 09:42 PM -0400, you wrote:
> > Ok, I think I've got this straight. I need another box. I have an
> unused 486DX50 VLB
> > with a nic and 32 meg ram, would that do for a firewall/router as you
> suggested?
Look into the Linux Router Project and something called Coyote. Don't know
wher
On Sun, 08 Apr 2001, John Aldrich wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Apr 2001, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> >
> > 1-2G drive for a firewall? I have a RH 6.2 firewall system with 210M
> > including 34M for swap. It would not need to be that bit but it also
> > serves out a couple of WEB pages, and filters mail.
On Sun, 08 Apr 2001, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>
> 1-2G drive for a firewall? I have a RH 6.2 firewall system with 210M
> including 34M for swap. It would not need to be that bit but it also
> serves out a couple of WEB pages, and filters mail.
>
> 103M used out of 165M
>
I'm anticipating the
On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, John Aldrich wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Apr 2001, Jerry Human wrote:
> Close. The 486 should do fine, especially if you don't
> install X. As for the USB, you still have the same problem
> -- you can't use that modem under linux. It doesn't have
> drivers for linux!
>
> As for drive
John Aldrich wrote:
> Close. The 486 should do fine, especially if you don't install X.
Great! That's what I wanted to hear. I'll start resurrecting the 486 this week.
> As for the USB, you still have the same problem -- you can't use that modem under
>linux. It
> doesn't have drivers for lin
On Sat, 07 Apr 2001, Jerry Human wrote:
>
> Ok, I think I've got this straight. I need another box. I have an unused 486DX50 VLB
> with a nic and 32 meg ram, would that do for a firewall/router as you suggested? I
> doesn't have USB but I heard that USB add-on cards are available. Which means I w
On Sat, 07 Apr 2001, Jerry Human wrote:
>
> Ok, I think I've got this straight. I need another box. I have an unused 486DX50 VLB
> with a nic and 32 meg ram, would that do for a firewall/router as you suggested? I
> doesn't have USB but I heard that USB add-on cards are available. Which means I w
John Aldrich wrote:
> What I'm saying is do NOT plug your modem directly into the hub/switch for your
> network. You want to either plug the ethernet modem into a linux router box with
> firewall, etc and then plug a second nic into your hub/switch, OR you can get a
> cable/dsl router (approxim
On Sat, 07 Apr 2001, Jerry Human wrote:
>
> Are you saying that I don't want to share the DSL with all my boxes or are you
> saying I don't want to share a USB modem with all my boxes?
>
What I'm saying is do NOT plug your modem directly into the
hub/switch for your network. You want to either p
"Gill, Vern" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Actually, to clarify a little. Most PacBell installs in the last 8
> months or so are DMT only. They use Alcatel DSLAMS. If your line is a
> Covad line, the only CAP device was the Flowpoint 2100 ADSL Router. One
> of the m
Hal Burgiss wrote:
> Are you reading the DSL-HOWTO at linuxdoc.org? Pretty much every issue you've raised
> is discussed in there. If something does not make sense
> to you. let me know.
Yes, and you're doing a great job maintaining it. It's very easy to read and follow.
I've even printed part o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Actually, to clarify a little. Most PacBell installs in the last 8
months or so are DMT only. They use Alcatel DSLAMS. If your line is a
Covad line, the only CAP device was the Flowpoint 2100 ADSL Router.
One of the more prevalent USB ADSL modems bein
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 12:26:26AM -0400, Jerry Human wrote:
> Hal Burgiss wrote:
>
> I'm sorry, I should have clarified this point. I have an ADSL account with
> Ameritech and they recommended the SpeedStream 4060 USB modem, which I
> have purchased. Ameritech hasn't really told me what type of
Hal Burgiss wrote:
> The question gets down to which type of ADSL. The most common is DMT.
> CAP ADSL is another that isused in a few places (pacbell maybe?), but
> DMT is much more prevalent. These require completely different modems.
> If yours is the Alcatel USB (you never did clarify this AFA
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 12:12:26AM -0400, Jerry Human wrote:
>
> I am new to all of this. I've been reading a lot of HOWTOS but I'm not sure what
> to do or what to do first. Any guidance you can offer would be greatly
> appreciated.
Are you reading the DSL-HOWTO at linuxdoc.org? Pretty much eve
John Aldrich wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Apr 2001, you wrote:
>
> > I do have a small network that I want to share DSL with all the boxes. So what
> do you suggest I do?
> >
> You DON'T want to do that!
Are you saying that I don't want to share the DSL with all my boxes or are you
saying I don't want to
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 11:10:19PM -0400, Jerry Human wrote:
>
>
> Hal Burgiss wrote:
>
> > Yes, there are many ethernet bridge/modems around. This is a much
> > better way to go.
>
> Would you be kind enough to name a few that are compatible with
> Linux?
Any of them are 'compatible' with Li
Hal Burgiss wrote:
> Yes, there are many ethernet bridge/modems around. This is a much better way
> to go.
Would you be kind enough to name a few that are compatible with Linux?
Thank you.
Jerry
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ht
On Fri, 06 Apr 2001, you wrote:
> > Yes, good advice. The only reason to use the Alcatel USB is just that
> > you absolutely can't find another option (aka ethernet).
>
> Are you saying that ADSL modems are available to connect to a hub? That is
> what I would have prefered but all I could find a
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 02:31:36AM -0400, Jerry Human wrote:
>
> Hal Burgiss wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 07:06:30PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I know kernel 2.4.x has better USB support. RH7 ships with 2.2.x so
> > you might want to consider a kernel upgrade.
> >
> > Actuall
Hal Burgiss wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 07:06:30PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I know kernel 2.4.x has better USB support. RH7 ships with 2.2.x so
> you might want to consider a kernel upgrade.
>
> Actually 2.4 is required for the Alcatel USB drivers. But not because of
> USB, but
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 07:06:30PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> I know kernel 2.4.x has better USB support. RH7 ships with 2.2.x so
> you might want to consider a kernel upgrade. I don't know anything
Actually 2.4 is required for the Alcatel USB drivers. But not because
of USB, but ATM sup
I know kernel 2.4.x has better USB support. RH7 ships with 2.2.x so you
might want to consider a kernel upgrade. I don't know anything
specifically about the Alcatel USB modems. But I know I switched mine
out for a regular external one that requires an ethernet card. I'm
prety sure if you trie
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 05:09:40PM -0400, Jerry Human wrote:
>
> I have finally received my new DSL modem but I'm having problems
> getting it to work in RH 7.0. First of all, it is a USB modem and
> since I don't have anything else that uses USB, I can't verify that
> it's working. Second, the A
35 matches
Mail list logo
