Couple of things: If you can open your ISP's page but nothing else it
could be a route issue. Do you have 2 default gw's set? Also, what's in
resolv.conf? Any DNS entries there?
<>
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 04:25, Syed Mohammad Riyaz wrote:
> Goodmorning everybody !
>
> Hi guys!
>
> I have linux 7
23, 2003 12:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Netscape stopping
Earthlink wrote:
>Bart
>
>Your a busy man, I see all the problems you are working on. Kudos' to you.
>
>Well I didn't find the all-ns.js file you asked me about, but I do know
>where you are gettin
Earthlink wrote:
Bart
Your a busy man, I see all the problems you are working on. Kudos' to you.
Well I didn't find the all-ns.js file you asked me about, but I do know
where you are getting at with a registration for the Netscape browser
because it was working just fine and now stopped like I
CTED] Behalf Of Bart SCHELSTRAETE
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 12:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Netscape stopping
Earthlink wrote:
>Hello I am using the latest version of redhat linux (version 8.0) and for
>some reason every time I try to start my web browser (Netscape) it w
Earthlink wrote:
Hello I am using the latest version of redhat linux (version 8.0) and for
some reason every time I try to start my web browser (Netscape) it will come
up for like two seconds and then something will kill it. I looked at all of
the system logs and there is nothing written to it at
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 03:29:11PM -0500, Ted Gervais wrote:
> I just installed a new copy of RH8.0 over the last few days and since there
> was no Netscape in the package I installed it separately.
>
> My question is, how do I get it to show in the various boxes that I go
> through when I am l
On Sat, 9 Nov 2002, Lawrence Houston wrote:
> On 8 Nov 2002, houston92 wrote:
>
> > Is there anyway to get Netscape 4.79 working on RH8.0? I have tried to
> > load the rpm and the gz file from Netscape. I am able to install the
> > software, but I am having problems with it abending due to a
>
Many pieces do work with Mozilla/Netscape 6 and 7. If you don't have
the java netlets it will work fine, it is just this small but for my
very important piece. The newest release of iPlanet will allow use of
java2 for the netlets, unfortunately we seem to be having problems
getting it to accept t
A problem is going to be the site. It is a company remote access site
using iPlanet portal server 3.0. It asks which kind of keycode I am
using, I select secure id. The page then directs me to an https site
asking for login id and password. After accepting the login and
password it starts confi
** Reply to message from Matthew Saltzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 09 Nov
2002 07:15:42 -0500 (EST)
>snip>
> > [hal@cadillac hal]$ rpm -q netscape-navigator
> > netscape-navigator-4.79-1
> >
> > I guess that's the package from 7.3. Runs OK ...
>
> I've been using that for some sites that refus
On 8 Nov 2002, houston92 wrote:
> Is there anyway to get Netscape 4.79 working on RH8.0? I have tried to
> load the rpm and the gz file from Netscape. I am able to install the
> software, but I am having problems with it abending due to a
> segmentation error. This happens when I log into an iP
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 11:26:05PM -0800, Jack Bowling wrote:
> >
> > abending?
>
> OK. I'll pretend that I'm not shocked that you have never heard the
> term before, Hal. But here is your definition:
Wow, that's what I get for being an English major. I consider my
vocabulary now += 1 :)
> ht
Op zaterdag 9 november 2002 13:15, schreef Matthew Saltzman:
What about upgrading to Netscape 7 ?
I use it also with a iplanet Mailserver and this works fine
PAtrick
> On Sat, 9 Nov 2002, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 11:48:43PM -0600, houston92 wrote:
> > > Is there anyway to
On Sat, 9 Nov 2002, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 11:48:43PM -0600, houston92 wrote:
> > Is there anyway to get Netscape 4.79 working on RH8.0? I have tried to
> > load the rpm and the gz file from Netscape. I am able to install the
> > software, but I am having problems with it a
** Reply to message from Hal Burgiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 09 Nov 2002
01:04:37 -0500
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 11:48:43PM -0600, houston92 wrote:
> > Is there anyway to get Netscape 4.79 working on RH8.0? I have tried to
> > load the rpm and the gz file from Netscape. I am able to instal
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 11:48:43PM -0600, houston92 wrote:
> Is there anyway to get Netscape 4.79 working on RH8.0? I have tried to
> load the rpm and the gz file from Netscape. I am able to install the
> software, but I am having problems with it abending due to a
> segmentation error. This hap
>you can change the fonts by going to Edit->Preferences. Change the font
>settings over there. Also check the box which says "use my default fonts,
>overriding document specified fonts"
>rahul.
The document is fine. It is the fonts used by Netscape for all of the options
along the top and anythin
you can change the fonts by going to Edit->Preferences. Change the font
settings over there. Also check the box which says "use my default fonts,
overriding document specified fonts"
rahul.
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Vidiot wrote:
> For some reason, when a link brings up a new Netscape window, all of t
hi,
you have to change the preferences of the web browser you are using. For
Mozilla and netscape click on Edit-Preferences. Click on Apperance in the
dialog box that pops up and change the fonts as per your needs. For
Konqueror there is a zoom icon. you can click on that to increase your
font siz
True enough but its much easier to deal with in Mozilla no ?
Duane Clark wrote:
> Aly wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> ...
>> You would have better luck using Mozilla 1.1 for those pop-up
>> windows in the options you can say donot open restricted windows, I
>> think that this is in the preferences s
Aly wrote:
> Hello,
> ...
> You would have better luck using Mozilla 1.1 for those pop-up windows
> in the options you can say donot open restricted windows, I think that
> this is in the preferences section of the Mozilla Edit menu. Netscape
> would prefer to have this happen to you the
Hello,
You would have to cp from the install dir of RP8 the rpx.so library
into the Netscape Plugins directory and then you should have no problems.
You would have better luck using Mozilla 1.1 for those pop-up windows
in the options you can say donot open restricted window
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 05:05 am, Dale Kosan wrote:
Or if you want to use a graphical interface to do the install, go to
your K start menu->system->file manager (super user mode), this will
open your file manager as root and will prompt you for the root
password navigate to the file you down
Open a terminal and cd into the Netscape directory, become root, su then
type ./netscape-installer and hit the enter key...
On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 03:18, Laszlo Saska wrote:
> I untar the downloaded file to upgrade Netscape.
> I got the files in the Netscape-installer folder.
> Now I am lost
OK,
I just tried the Ebay search in Netscape 4.78 on another one of our Red
Hat 7.2 machines. The same crash! I was using the Ebay search engine
fine until two days ago. Could Ebay have changed something on their
end?
Cameron Simpson wrote:
>
> On 15:59 23 May 2002, Hidong Kim <[EMAIL
I just downloaded Mozilla rc3. Thanks,
Hidong
Cameron Simpson wrote:
>
> On 15:59 23 May 2002, Hidong Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Thanks for the reply. I have tried clearing my Netscape cache, and it
> | still happens. the strange thing is that this problem just started
> | hap
On 15:59 23 May 2002, Hidong Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Thanks for the reply. I have tried clearing my Netscape cache, and it
| still happens. the strange thing is that this problem just started
| happening two days ago. Before that, I was able to search on Ebay just
| fine.
Weird. Does
Thanks for the reply. I have tried clearing my Netscape cache, and it
still happens. the strange thing is that this problem just started
happening two days ago. Before that, I was able to search on Ebay just
fine.
Cameron Simpson wrote:
>
> On 12:53 23 May 2002, Hidong Kim <[EMAIL PROTEC
On 12:53 23 May 2002, Hidong Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I'm running Netscape 4.78 on Red Hat 7.2. I've occasionally had
| sporadic Netscape bus error crashes. Now I get a consistent bus error
| Netscape crash when I try to do a search on Ebay. I can go to any page
| on Ebay, but when I tr
Hi,
> A lot of times these are set via a gtk theme. The fonts chosen might
> actually be broken or non-existant. You may have a file name ~/.gtkrc in
> your home directory. If so, try renaming it to something else, log out,
> log in and see if it fixes the problem.
>
> Barring that, there are som
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 07:47:07 -0700
"Chris Daft" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> quietly intimated:
> Hi,
>
> In RH 7.2 I find that Netscape's (4.78en) menus, as well as various
> dialog boxes from other programs, have unreadable fonts (that is, the
> characters come out as boxes, not letters). I noticed th
you can also configure squid to prevent banner ads. Check out ad zapper if
you run the squid proxy.
At 03:22 PM 3/10/2002 -0600, you wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 12:42:58PM -0600 or thereabouts, Vidiot wrote:
>
> > Isn't there a fast and smart program that can be placed between the
>browser
>
On Sun, 10 Mar 2002 09:19:04 -0800 (PST)
David Talkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled in frustration:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Rick Warner wrote:
>
>>My web team tests against the top 5 browsers ...
>
>IE, NS, Moz, Opera ... Konqueror?
L
On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, David Talkington wrote:
> The usual problem with these numbers is that they don't account for
> the Opera users who choose to identify their software as MSIE to keep
> from being locked out of poorly written sites ...
Exactly.
Opera rocks.
Cheers,
--
Richard Potter RHCE
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 04:45:58PM -0600, Vidiot wrote:
> >Mozilla does a lot of this too, but I don't think we are talking the
> >same degree of flexibility.
[...]
> OK, is the above for Netscape (which version) or opera?
It would effect any and all content passing through the proxy. It
effec
>Which sites? Make sure you're using the latest one. The last
>"technology preview" occasionally crashed mysteriously, but I've had
>very little trouble with the latest.
I'll grab the latest and they them again.
MB
--
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is God's job to forgive bin Laden.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hal Burgiss wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 05:26:49PM -0500, Hal Burgiss wrote:
>
>> > For what it's worth, Opera can do a lot of that stuff for you -- GIF
>> > de-animation, blocking of popups, tight (and flexible) control over
>> > cookies, user-c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vidiot wrote:
>I'd switch to opera, if it were to have less bugs. It has trouble displaying
>many sites I visit.
Which sites? Make sure you're using the latest one. The last
"technology preview" occasionally crashed mysteriously, but I've had
v
>Mozilla does a lot of this too, but I don't think we are talking the
>same degree of flexibility.
>
>Quote from the re_filterfile (filters/modifies web page content), and
>some other examples to demonstrate flexibility:
>
># /
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 05:26:49PM -0500, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> > For what it's worth, Opera can do a lot of that stuff for you -- GIF
> > de-animation, blocking of popups, tight (and flexible) control over
> > cookies, user-configurable stylesheets.
>
> Mozilla does a lot of this too, but I don'
>For what it's worth, Opera can do a lot of that stuff for you -- GIF
>de-animation, blocking of popups, tight (and flexible) control over
>cookies, user-configurable stylesheets.
>David Talkington
I'd switch to opera, if it were to have less bugs. It has trouble displaying
many sites I visit.
>This a continuation of the old Junkbuster, with a lot of enhancements.
>Quoting from docs:
>Hal Burgiss
Thanks.
MB
--
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is God's job to forgive bin Laden.
It is our job to set up the meeting.
U
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 01:55:12PM -0800, David Talkington wrote:
> Hal Burgiss wrote:
>
> >http://ijbswa.sourceforge.net
> >
> >This a continuation of the old Junkbuster, with a lot of enhancements.
> >Quoting from docs:
>
> For what it's worth, Opera can do a lot of that stuff for you -- GIF
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hal Burgiss wrote:
>http://ijbswa.sourceforge.net
>
>This a continuation of the old Junkbuster, with a lot of enhancements.
>Quoting from docs:
For what it's worth, Opera can do a lot of that stuff for you -- GIF
de-animation, blocking of popups, ti
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 12:42:58PM -0600, Vidiot wrote:
>
> Isn't there a fast and smart program that can be placed between the browser
> and the net that read the HTML coming back to the browser that removes the
> ad links from the incoming web page, replacing them with "nothing?"
http://ijbswa
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 12:42:58PM -0600 or thereabouts, Vidiot wrote:
> Isn't there a fast and smart program that can be placed between the
browser
> and the net that read the HTML coming back to the browser that removes
the
> ad links from the incoming web page, replacing them with "nothing?"
Cameron Simpson responded:
I found my problem.
A while back, and I totally forgot that I did it, someone posted a bunch of
as site URLs, which were then put into your local host file and redirected
to your localhost 127.0.0.1 address.
Well, Netscape doesn't like that. It effectively strips off
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ed Wilts wrote:
>My web site reports (from analog) the following from the last 6 months:
>
>1. MSIE/5
>2. MSIE/6
>3. Mozilla/4
>4. MSIE/4
>5. Mozilla/5
>6. Netscape (compatible)
>
>A Mac browser made it into the 23rd spot. There are no other non
> >My web team tests against the top 5 browsers ...
>
> IE, NS, Moz, Opera ... Konqueror?
My web site reports (from analog) the following from the last 6 months:
1. MSIE/5
2. MSIE/6
3. Mozilla/4
4. MSIE/4
5. Mozilla/5
6. Netscape (compatible)
A Mac browser made it into the 23rd spot. There
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rick Warner wrote:
>My web team tests against the top 5 browsers ...
IE, NS, Moz, Opera ... Konqueror?
- -d
- --
David Talkington
PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp
- --
http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/pale_blue_dot.h
Browsers tend to be sensitive to improperly written HTML. IE used to be
the most sensitve, Netscape is now. Bet if you go through the HTML you
will find a tag that is not ended properly or that has a syntax error. A
good webmaster would test against all browsers, but few do. I always send
com
On 22:38 09 Mar 2002, Vidiot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| What the hell is going on with Netscape? I have the 4.77 RPM version installed
| on RH7.1 and the damn thing is screwing up URLs way too often.
|
| For example:
|
|
|http://ad.doubleclick.net/adj/ccmain.superstitial/homepage;dcopt=ist;a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bob Hartung wrote:
>David,
> I deleted $HOME/.netscape. I still lack a readable font on the license
>window that pops up when netscape is started.
Oh. See previous post (Netscape sucks).
> I have mozilla-0.9.2.1 installed.[It is very sluggish
David,
I appreciate your dislike for netscape but ---
I deleted $HOME/.netscape. I still lack a readable font on the license
window that pops up when netscape is started.
I have mozilla-0.9.2.1 installed.[It is very sluggish cf. netstape]. I
tried to install the latest rpm but have t
Talkington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 4 February 2002 07:59
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Netscape fonts still screwed up.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bob Hartung wrote:
>Again,
> In addition to that below, netscape looks and works fine when logged in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bob Hartung wrote:
>Again,
> In addition to that below, netscape looks and works fine when logged in
>as a different user and using the KDE desktop. So the question is, how
>does a user control the fonts mapped to his desktop. I can find little
Again,
In addition to that below, netscape looks and works fine when logged in
as a different user and using the KDE desktop. So the question is, how
does a user control the fonts mapped to his desktop. I can find little
useful or understandable informatio on RedHat's site. Direction plea
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, BobH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:Hi,
: I just upgraded to KDE-2.2.2 on a RH-2 box with netscape-4.78 installed.
: I have lost all the menus and command bar fonts! I have done a force
:refresh and still no good.
:
: The text on the web pages renders just fine. E-Mail,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 27 January 2002 09:57 am, BobH wrote:
> Netscape works just fine on Gnome. The problem is only with the KDE
> dekstop. I will check more out when I get home from NYC and Linux
> Expo.
Do you have antialised fonts enabled in KDE?
If so, yo
Netscape works just fine on Gnome. The problem is only with the KDE
dekstop. I will check more out when I get home from NYC and Linux Expo.
Thanks,
Bob
Mike Watson wrote:
>
> Check your fonts. DId you update some? I've updated two of my boxes with KDE
> 2.2.2 and Netscape 4.78 works just
Check your fonts. DId you update some? I've updated two of my boxes with KDE
2.2.2 and Netscape 4.78 works just fine on both.
Mike W
BobH wrote:
>
> Hi,
>I just upgraded to KDE-2.2.2 on a RH-2 box with netscape-4.78 installed.
> I have lost all the menus and command bar fonts! I have d
On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 21:17, BobH wrote:
> Hi,
>I just upgraded to KDE-2.2.2 on a RH-2 box with netscape-4.78 installed.
> I have lost all the menus and command bar fonts! I have done a force
> refresh and still no good.
>
>The text on the web pages renders just fine. E-Mail, once I
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 02:41:08PM -0500, Janyne Kizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Yes, I understand where it's supposed to be created. I was just
| wondering if it was supposed to be created when the account is added or
| when certain preferences are saved or what. Thanks!
Note also that the
We're in a sort of pre-beta phase now but basically we had Sun servers
that we are phasing out and we hope to use Linux as a replacement (so we
had all of the boot files already). We installed RH 7.2 and included
TFTP. Once we got that working, we copied the boot files to the
tftpboot directory.
Hello Janyne
I am also interested in running NCD ThinStars as X terminals
Can you give me some of the info you have put together on how to
make this work.
You can mail direct to me if you wish
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
many thanks
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Janyne Kizer [mailto:[EMAIL PR
Sorry, I read that too quickly and read "where" instead of "when".
Each user can create their own .Xresources file whenever they want or
if you want the file to be created when the account is created, put
the file in /etc/skel. Do a 'ls -al /etc/skel' to see what's already
there.
Dave
> From
Yes, I understand where it's supposed to be created. I was just
wondering if it was supposed to be created when the account is added or
when certain preferences are saved or what. Thanks!
Dave Reed wrote:
>
> > From: Janyne Kizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > When is the ~/.Xresources file suppo
> From: Janyne Kizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> When is the ~/.Xresources file supposed to be created?
In Unix/Linux the ~ refers to home directories. So ~/.Xresources
would be in /home/username where username is your login name.
You will also see the ~ used for other peoples home directories.
When is the ~/.Xresources file supposed to be created?
Gregg Morris wrote:
>
> Janyne,
>
> These options can go in ~/.Xresources. I haven't played with the
> color options like this, but from what I see on the web page you
> mention, it should take the form:
>
> Netscape.ncols: 256
>
> I
Thanks a lot! Yes, the all have home directories on the server. (the
users that is, not the xterms themselves.
Gregg Morris wrote:
>
> Janyne,
>
> These options can go in ~/.Xresources. I haven't played with the
> color options like this, but from what I see on the web page you
> mention, it
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 01:45:56 +0100 (CET)
Wolfgang Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> implied:
> On Nov 25, 2001, 18:25 (-0600) ABrady wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 25 Nov 2001 14:20:11 -0800 (PST)
> > Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> implied:
> >
> > > On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> > >
> >
On Nov 25, 2001, 18:25 (-0600) ABrady wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Nov 2001 14:20:11 -0800 (PST)
> Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> implied:
>
> > On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> >
> > > Netscape 4.77 (on Redhat 6.2) is *suddenly* starting very slowly: it
[ ... snipped, svrl. times ...
On Sun, 25 Nov 2001 14:20:11 -0800 (PST)
Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> implied:
> On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> > Netscape 4.77 (on Redhat 6.2) is *suddenly* starting very slowly: it
> > takes up to 5 or more minutes until he loads the local start file --
> > the whole N
On Nov 25, 2001, 14:20 (-0800) Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> > Netscape 4.77 (on Redhat 6.2) is *suddenly* starting very slowly:
... this is only half the truth ... IIRC I had the same problem around
March
On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> Netscape 4.77 (on Redhat 6.2) is *suddenly* starting very slowly: it
> takes up to 5 or more minutes until he loads the local start file --
> the whole Netscape window is nearly empty during this start-up process
> (all I can see at this time is the
As far as my experience with Netscape 4.61 goes, if you have an entry
from the address book open, it locks up all other Netscape windows. If
you just have the address book main window open, you can view some of
the information for a particular entry by scrolling to the right to
reveal more fields
Silviu Cojocaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, at 00:02 (GMT -0500), Statux wrote:
>
> > > Have you given Opera a try yet? I have been quite pleased with it thus far.
> > > You can get at http://www.opera.com
> >
> > Opera is commercial.
>
> Was.
Is.
They're trying to rele
hi there
There was a time when i used vmware based windows to browse,
because i wanted linux as the OS, and IE 5 as the browser. Frankly, IE
beats the pants off netscape anytime...IE 4 was a big advance over its
predecessors, i'm waiting for a similar one on a linux platform.
Konq
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, at 00:02 (GMT -0500), Statux wrote:
> > Have you given Opera a try yet? I have been quite pleased with it thus far.
> > You can get at http://www.opera.com
>
> Opera is commercial.
Was.
--
If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
It's true it is bloated BUT it works alot better than Netscape 6 for me.
Wishing Linux version of any browser will perform that well.
CH
Justin Zygmont wrote:
> you should see IE, it's 70MB! 110 or something like that for a full
> install. You know if it's bloated it's Microsoft.
>
>
> On F
Netscape 6 is really a pig. When I tried to open Netscape while I have
other apps running (couldn't remember what) and it took super long time
to load to a 64mb system and seeing my hard disk working full time and I
found that the swap file was as big as my 64mb ram so I bought 256mb and
woul
No. Netscape, as with any package, (unless specially built by RH as an
RPM), is distribution independent... plus mine's done via tarball ;)
The netscape directory does have several files and subdirectories.. but
you aren't understanding what I said. The MAIN binary, which is the program
itself...
Some time in the early months of the 21st century, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, lee wrote:
>
>> anyway i'm glad to have what I have in linux don't get me
>> wronggaleon is no better in similar ways but at least its
>> fairly beta and coming alon
On 30-Mar-01 Silviu Cojocaru opined:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, at 00:49 (GMT -0600), ABrady wrote:
>
>> Galeon is getting to be workable. Missing a couple of things and still
>> some infrequent crashes (for me). Requires Mozilla be installed
>> (another
>> memory hog) but, doesn't overload the syst
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, at 00:49 (GMT -0600), ABrady wrote:
> Galeon is getting to be workable. Missing a couple of things and still
> some infrequent crashes (for me). Requires Mozilla be installed (another
> memory hog) but, doesn't overload the system with bringing up gobs of
> useless stuff to g
>
> Try Konqueror (part of KDE 2.1, as found on
> http://www.linux-easy.com/rh-updates/) - it's the only one you haven't
> mentioned, and IMO it works best.
>
:)you're right I didn't I normally work out of gnome..i'll check but
doesn't Konqueror require use of active kde desktop?..
if not kew
Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, lee wrote:
>
> > anyway i'm glad to have what I have in linux don't get me
> > wronggaleon is no better in similar ways but at least its
> > fairly beta and coming along well..
> >
> > i 'd rather not use opera
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, lee wrote:
> anyway i'm glad to have what I have in linux don't get me
> wronggaleon is no better in similar ways but at least its
> fairly beta and coming along well..
>
> i 'd rather not use opera due to its nature and i 'd rather not deal
> with ads so for now
> I'm fed up with netscape..the default browser that came with RH 7.0. If I open up
>too many windows, it freezes and I have to kill everything before loading it up
>again...its a resource hog and I want something slimmer. It exhibits a lot of other
>annoying behavior too..
>
> I would even
Glen Lee Edwards wrote:
> Wow, what a difference! I couldn't find the advertising version, and
> the dynamic library version wouldn't run. But the static version
> looks like a race horse on this system compared to Netscape and
> Mozilla! So far it's downloaded all the sites I've tried without
my installation of netscape is different, it has it's own directory with
seperate files and subdirectories, is that with RH 7? I have 6.2
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Statux wrote:
> Um.. I don't think the one file is that big... considering the fact that
> MS has enough common sense to seperate each
Wow, what a difference! I couldn't find the advertising version, and
the dynamic library version wouldn't run. But the static version
looks like a race horse on this system compared to Netscape and
Mozilla! So far it's downloaded all the sites I've tried without any
problems.
Glen
Bruce Embre
Netscape is a pig, so is IE (there was once a version for Unix IIRC).
It's not finished yet, but go and get Opera from www.opera.com. Most
sites work with it. Mainly no java/plugins.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.r
Um.. I don't think the one file is that big... considering the fact that
MS has enough common sense to seperate each applet into its own
application. I'm talking about this:
-r-xr-xr-x1 root root 13755112 Oct 6 19:38
/usr/local/netscape/netscape
That's the whole program.. browser, m
you should see IE, it's 70MB! 110 or something like that for a full
install. You know if it's bloated it's Microsoft.
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Statux wrote:
> Through it all, what did you expect for a 13-14MB binary that contains
> every component of the suite? :P
>
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Thomas
On 30-Mar-01 Thomas Duterme opined:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm fed up with netscape..the default browser that came with RH 7.0.
> If I open up too many windows, it freezes and I have to kill everything
> before loading it up again...its a resource hog and I want something
> slimmer. It exhibits a
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 12:17:51PM -0500, Thomas Duterme wrote:
> I'm fed up with netscape..the default browser that came with RH 7.0. If
> I open up too many windows, it freezes and I have to kill everything before
> loading it up again...its a resource hog and I want something slimmer. It
> e
Wayne Dyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thomas Duterme wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'm fed up with netscape..the default browser that came with RH
> >7.0. If I open up too many windows, it freezes and I have to
> >kill everything before loading it up again...its a resource hog
> >and I wan
I just tried it, well version 0.8.1 is the latest official
release as far as I have seen.
There is some improvements over some aspect of netscape, but it is
still beta software. It is buggy. It has problem with some
frames which netscape handles correctly. Fonts are much better
displayed. F
Through it all, what did you expect for a 13-14MB binary that contains
every component of the suite? :P
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Thomas Duterme wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm fed up with netscape..the default browser that came with RH 7.0. If I open up
>too many windows, it freezes and I have to k
1 - 100 of 384 matches
Mail list logo
