In that case, just put in CNAME records in the other zone files to point
to aaa.com.
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Charles Holbrook wrote:
> Um I just realized that this might not of been clear enough. I want all of
> those different versions of aaa to point to the same domain name so
> everything els
You create one zone file, and then in your named.conf file, you set the
"file:" parameter to that same file.
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Charles Holbrook wrote:
> I have multiple domains registered that all end up pointing to the same IP
> address. This would seem to be a fairly simple project. But
dang that was quick. You wouldn't by any chance know if bind can take
shorthad or something like it would you?
EXAMPLE:
zone "domain-a.com";"domain-b.com";"domain-c.com" {
type master;
file "domain-a.com";
};
At 12:46 AM 1/22/2003 +0100, you wrote:
Put in your named.conf followin
Put in your named.conf following:
zone "domain-a.com" {
type master;
file "domain-a.com";
};
zone "domain-b.com" {
type master;
file "domain-a.com";
};
zone "domain-c.com" {
type master;
file "domain-a.com";
};
etc.
and create domain-a.com fi
Um I just realized that this might not of been clear enough. I want all of
those different versions of aaa to point to the same domain name so
everything else points to aaa.com. All domains are registered and out there.
At 05:29 PM 1/21/2003 -0600, you wrote:
I have multiple domains registered
I have multiple domains registered that all end up pointing to the same IP
address. This would seem to be a fairly simple project. But right now due
to my massive brain fart I have created zone files for every single domain
name. How do I just forward all of those domain names to the same zon
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Gary wrote:
>
> Personally, I would not use BIND, but rather tinydns, part of the djbdns
> package. It is much more secure, especially when out on the net, and
> given the newest exploits in BIND as recent as a few days ago. Tinydns also
> can handle 5000 quires a second. I
Hi Linda,
On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, 9:51 AM, you put forth, in part, about "dns question":
>> I have been reading all the documentation with djbdns and it looks much
>> easier than Bind In the setup instructions it has you add to users
>> Gtinydns and Gdnsl
Sent this yesterday but it never appeared so resending
sorry if it shows up twice.
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Gary wrote:
>
>
> >
> > Personally, I would not use BIND, but rather tinydns, part of the djbdns
> > package. It is much more secure, especiall
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:38:39 +0100, Michael Schwendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 20:12:53 +0100, Giulio Orsero wrote:
>> Seems you're not alone:
>> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74477
>
>Permission denied.
>Sorry; you do not have the permissions necessary
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I really don't get why when the computer is looking for an address it
> tries the nameservers in resolv.conf before it tries hosts. However I
> gather that the best way to solve my problem is to setup DNS and name
> caching on my computer. I have a few questions since the
It also says "To see this bug, you must first log in."
At 01:38 PM 11/15/02, you wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 20:12:53 +0100, Giulio Orsero wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:16:30 -0600 (CST), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> wrote:
>>
>> >I really don't get
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/DNS-HOWTO-3.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really don't get why when the computer is looking for an address
it tries the nameservers in resolv.conf before it tries hosts. However
I gather that the best way to solve my problem is to setup DNS and
name caching on my compu
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:16:30 -0600 (CST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I really don't get why when the computer is looking for an address
>it tries the nameservers in resolv.conf before it tries hosts. However
Seems you're not alone:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74477
http://bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 20:12:53 +0100, Giulio Orsero wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:16:30 -0600 (CST), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >I really don't get why when the computer is looking for an address
> >it tries the nameservers in resolv.conf before
Make sure that your /etc/nsswitch.conf file has a hosts line that looks
like this:
hosts: files dns
Yours probably says "dns files" instead.
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I really don't get why when the computer is looking for an address
> it tries the nameservers in resolv.c
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 12:16:30PM -0600 or thereabouts, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I really don't get why when the computer is looking for an address
> it tries the nameservers in resolv.conf before it tries hosts. However
Double check your host.conf file to make sure "order hosts" are listed fir
I really don't get why when the computer is looking for an address
it tries the nameservers in resolv.conf before it tries hosts. However
I gather that the best way to solve my problem is to setup DNS and
name caching on my computer. I have a few questions since the whole
thing has me quite confuse
,
> as in the IP is dead.
>
> I seem to have some situations where the secondary seems not to take
> over. I have heard that M$ machines do not act like linux boxes and have
> a long timeout period before going to secondary DNS servers. Im asking a
> general DNS question here a
that M$ machines do not act like linux
boxes and have a long timeout period before going to secondary DNS servers. Im
asking a general DNS question here as to what are the rules (RFC's) of DNS. Im
interested in what is propper, not what M$ does with their products. That i can
easily find o
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Ed Lazor spewed into the bitstream:
EL>Hi =)
EL>
EL>This was in my logs:
EL>
EL>Feb 22 21:12:41 arcane named[2342]: denied AXFR from [205.166.226.38].4781
EL>for "atfantasy.com" (acl)
EL>
EL>After searching the archives and reading a message from Ramon (copied
EL>below), I'm
It's all about getting spam email to users faster. US government was doing
good when they said that you can mass advertize as long as you include
instructions for list removal (which most advertisers don't adhere to
anyway), but most that do don't include a legit way (most are non-existant
account
Hi =)
This was in my logs:
Feb 22 21:12:41 arcane named[2342]: denied AXFR from [205.166.226.38].4781
for "atfantasy.com" (acl)
After searching the archives and reading a message from Ramon (copied
below), I'm a little curious. Is it still safe to ignore this log
entry? Also, why would hav
gt;
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 11:40 PM
Subject: Re: BIND/DNS question
> > No. It helps when you try and do revers DNS lookups, but reverse
DNS
> > doesn't even need to point to your domain name.
>
> Hmmm, okay - let me explain furt
no it is not required however if you need to do a reverse on your IP you
need this unless your ISP will do a manual entry for you.
-Original Message-
From: Ditesh Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 1:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BIND/DNS question
Did you also give the registrar the IP of that server?
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001 05:40:36 +0800 (SGT), Ditesh Kumar wrote:
>> No. It helps when you try and do revers DNS lookups, but reverse DNS
>> doesn't even need to point to your domain name.
>
>Hmmm, okay - let me explain further about my problem
> No. It helps when you try and do revers DNS lookups, but reverse DNS
> doesn't even need to point to your domain name.
Hmmm, okay - let me explain further about my problem. When I try to
change the authoritative nameserver for my domains (which were registered
at different registrars), I get
No...you are authoritative for your domain as long as you've got your DNS
server configured to answer for it, and you've registered your DNS server
with a registrar to answer for that domain.
If your ISP delegates authority to your server for your in-addr.arpa, then
you become authoritative for y
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Ditesh Kumar wrote:
> > No. It helps when you try and do revers DNS lookups, but reverse DNS
> > doesn't even need to point to your domain name.
>
> Hmmm, okay - let me explain further about my problem. When I try to
> change the authoritative nameserver for my domains (whic
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Ditesh Kumar wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have successfully setup BIND but have the following question:
>
> In order for my DNS server to serve as authoritative for a domain, does
> its (the DNS server) in-arpa have to be setup properly too? In other
> words, I have to get my IS
Hello all,
I have successfully setup BIND but have the following question:
In order for my DNS server to serve as authoritative for a domain, does
its (the DNS server) in-arpa have to be setup properly too? In other
words, I have to get my ISP to properly in-arpa the IP address so that my
DNS se
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Rob Tanner wrote:
> You need to configure the resolver which you can do either under
> "names" in the network section of the control-panel, or you can simply
> create the file /etc/resolv.conf if you already know what that contents
> should be and the correct syntax.
>
> O
Yep, that was it. I didn't have an entry in the nameserver just had the
domain in the resolv.conf file.
Stephen King
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
You need to configure the resolver which you can do either under
"names" in the network section of the control-panel, or you can simply
create the file /etc/resolv.conf if you already know what that contents
should be and the correct syntax.
On the other hand, if you're running a name server o
What do your /etc/resolv.conf entries look like?
-Original Message-
From: Stephen King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 2:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DNS question
When I do a nslookup I get
Default Server-ns1.steveandjane.net
Address-0.0.0.0
where
When I do a nslookup I get
Default Server-ns1.steveandjane.net
Address-0.0.0.0
where in the configuration files is it getting 0.0.0.0 for the address?
Stephen King
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/l
Hi Stephen,
Put lines like the following in the zone files.
domainname.com. A xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
www A xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
etc...
Have fun,
--
_
Brian Ashe CTO
[EMAIL PROTE
I'm trying to figure out how to not be able to type anything except the
domain name and get a response. Example
domainname.com and get a response instead of typing www.domainname.com.
Basically what I'm trying to say is I want to be able to leave off the www
to get a response from that domain.
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Kris Keele wrote:
> When running a dns server on a subnet what is the best practice for
> setting up reverse? I have the ip range delegated to me from my
> provider, but am having some issues with the dns server picking it up.
> Here is what I have: ( I am using real ips, but
When running a dns server on a subnet what is the best practice for
setting up reverse? I have the ip range delegated to me from my
provider, but am having some issues with the dns server picking it up.
Here is what I have: ( I am using real ips, but the example has fakes)
zone "96-127.10.10.10.
>
> I'm no DNS guru myself, but it seems to me that you're trying to enter a
> canonical record for a domain within the database file for a completely
> domain name. I mean, this file that you pasted here corresponds to the
> mydom.com.ar domain, but the record you're trying to add belongs to th
Hi Fernando,
You will need to create a new 'zone' called clie1.com in the named.conf (or
named.boot if it is an old bind) the create the record for it.
If this is just to be able to do some sort of internal web development (I'm
just guessing since I do something similar) why not try just doing t
On Thu, 17 Aug 2000, Fernando Rowies wrote:
> I'm running bind in a linux box isolated from Internet
> and have configured dns to test purposes.
>
> This is my db.mydom.com.ar configuration:
>
> @IN SOA host1.mydom.com.ar. root.host1.mydom.com.ar. (
> 282001 ;
t h o n y L a w s o n
Systems/Networking Support - CCNA
Semaphore Corporation 206.905.5028
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Fernando Rowies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 8:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DNS question
I'm running bind in a linux box isolated from Internet
and have configured dns to test purposes.
This is my db.mydom.com.ar configuration:
@IN SOA host1.mydom.com.ar. root.host1.mydom.com.ar. (
282001 ; serial
10800 ; refresh after 3
on 13/4/2000 4:59 PM, Brad Cramer shot down the bitstream:
> I am trying to set up a DNS server for my home dial up network. I have went
> through all my zone files and /etc/named.conf file and can not figure out
> what is wrong. When I do a DNS query I get theis in /var/log/messages:
> named (14
On Sun, Apr 16, 2000 at 02:39:34PM -0500, Steve Feehan wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Brad Cramer wrote:
>
> > when I run ps ax it shows that named -u is running but under tty it shows ?
> > as it does for some other processes. could this be creating the problem? or
> > is this trivial?
> > Thanks
On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Brad Cramer wrote:
> when I run ps ax it shows that named -u is running but under tty it shows ?
> as it does for some other processes. could this be creating the problem? or
> is this trivial?
> Thanks
> Brad
>
The ? means that it doesn't have a controlling tty which is no
trying to set up a named server on my home lan, it's running on a headless
sparcstation IPC anyway I am having problem with it. In /var/log/messages I
get :
named;(1437): sysquery: nlookup failed on ?
when I run ps ax it shows that named -u is running but under tty it shows ?
as it does for some
I am trying to set up a DNS server for my home dial up network. I have went
through all my zone files and /etc/named.conf file and can not figure out
what is wrong. When I do a DNS query I get theis in /var/log/messages:
named (1457): sysquery: nlookup error on ?
anyone have any idea what I am mi
-Original Message-
From: Mikkel L. Ellertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Saturday, April 08, 2000 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: DNS question
>At 09:06 AM 4/8/00 -0500, you wrote:
>>I have set up a DNS server for my home network an
At 09:06 AM 4/8/00 -0500, you wrote:
>I have set up a DNS server for my home network and everything seems to work
>fine, except when I telnet into the dns server and try to ping another
>machine from there it can't seem to resolv the name. As far as I can tell
>everything is set-up correctly anyon
I have set up a DNS server for my home network and everything seems to work
fine, except when I telnet into the dns server and try to ping another
machine from there it can't seem to resolv the name. As far as I can tell
everything is set-up correctly anyone have any ideas?
BTW I am running RH 6.2
Afternoon Hatters:
I'm trying to resolve an issue on my machine that has come up in the last
day or two.
I was originally running Red hat 6.1 with all of the updates applied. My
connection to the Internet is a cable modem through Media One, here in
Massachusetts. In the past, my machine booted
I have exactly the same problem. I believe Netscape tries to resolve the
ip-addresses for the News server so you might want to try putting them in your
/etc/hosts file (although I don't think Netscape even cares looking at these
files). I didn't try it myself yet (most of the time when I use m
What's the best way to set up DNS if you have an ethernet LAN at home
(just using host file) and use PPP to get to the internet through an ISP
occasionally? Currently, if I'm not connected via PPP, Netscape will
hang if I try to use it to view downloaded email or look at an HTML
document. In nsswi
I hate it when this happens...
I figured it out. For reference: the SOA entry defines the
Authoritative Nameserver for the record/domain.
Cheers,
Mike Cathey([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Mike Cathey wrote:
>
> First off--I'm running an old version of bind. I need to setup an
> domain that has a ptp
First off--I'm running an old version of bind. I need to setup an
domain that has a ptp link to me that will be running their own dns
servers. However they are using one of my C addresses. How do I make
bind/named defer to their primary/secondary nameservers rather than
looking at it's own reco
Harjinder Dhudwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've just configured a Redhat machine as an DNS server. We have set some
>machines to use it.
>We can ping and the name is resolved and we receive an ping reply.
>But if I want to rlogin (or telnet) on to said machine, I cannot log in. If
>an entry i
I've just configured a Redhat machine as an DNS server. We have set some
machines to use it.
We can ping and the name is resolved and we receive an ping reply.
But if I want to rlogin (or telnet) on to said machine, I cannot log in. If
an entry is placed into the machine's host file, I can log in
Lance Robertson wrote:
> the web browser when it points to DOMAIN. I want to be able to set up
> fred.DOMAIN
> and blah.DOMAIN so they will serve via the HTTP as well but will server out of
> their
> own directories.
> I have a Cacheing DNS running. I have one "real" IP
> address
> which is pre
Ok, big question here.
First off the basics. I'm pretty new to linux but am seeming to get around
pretty good.
I have Redhat 5.0. I'm trying to set up Name-Based Virtual Hosting as a test
for another
server. My domain is DOMAIN and I've got the Apache 1.3 Web server so it will
serve
the web brows
62 matches
Mail list logo
