Sent this yesterday but it never appeared so resending sorry if it shows up twice. On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Gary wrote: > > <snip> > > > > Personally, I would not use BIND, but rather tinydns, part of the djbdns > > package. It is much more secure, especially when out on the net, and > > given the newest exploits in BIND as recent as a few days ago. Tinydns also > > can handle 5000 quires a second. Its caching server, called dnscache, > > defaults to 1MB, and smoothly discards the older cache, while adding in > > new ones. If you must use BIND which has its own built in cache, there are > > several good tutorials on the net for setting it up. www.google.com/linux/ > > can help you there. > > > I have been reading all the documentation with djbdns and it looks > much easier than Bind In the setup instructions it has you add to > users Gtinydns and Gdnslog or these users similar to uucp with no > password and in their own group? > Thanks > Linda > > -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
