On Saturday 18 October 2003 11:18, Sachintha Karunaratne wrote:
> hay,
> can somebody tell me a command
> to find the xfree86 version and also
> the default version on RH9?
from 'man XFree86":
XFree86 -version
will tell you the version installed and if you go to the download
mirrors you can
On Thursday 16 October 2003 13:42, Broadcast IT wrote:
> Interesting...so does that setting go in the /etc/xinetd.d/wu-ftpd
> file or the /usr/sbin/in.ftpd file (or something else)?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Stuart
>
The former, however, you can also put it in the /etc/xinetd.conf file as
a default and it
On Thursday 16 October 2003 12:30, Broadcast IT wrote:
> Haven't found anything pertaining to this...did I miss something?
> Does anyone know what the default is, and is it an adjustable
> parameter (if so how)?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Stuart
On late RH boxen wu-ftpd is run via xinetd for the default
con
On Monday 13 October 2003 15:58, Edward Croft wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 14:43, David C. Hart wrote:
> > I'm trying to get two cards in a server to cooperate. Here's the
> > routing table which is slightly abbreviated for display:
> >
> > Kernel IP routing table
> > Destination Gateway Genmask
On Friday 10 October 2003 19:30, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> MKlinke wrote:
> > I haven't tried it with crontab so I don't know if it'll fit here
> > but with batch jobs like this via ssh the ssh-agent mechanism works
> > very well. The thought of null passphrases
On Friday 10 October 2003 15:01, Bret Hughes wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 14:16, Bill Tangren wrote:
> > Chris Purcell wrote:
> > >>I tried this on both the backup machine, and the machine to be
> > >> backed up. I still get prompted for a password. Could you (or
> > >> someone else) provide an e
On Friday 10 October 2003 14:48, Bill Tangren wrote:
> MKlinke wrote:
> > On Friday 10 October 2003 13:35, Bill Tangren wrote:
> >>MKlinke wrote:
> >>>On Thursday 09 October 2003 10:41, Aly Dharshi wrote:
> >>>>Hello,
> >>>>
> >&g
On Friday 10 October 2003 13:35, Bill Tangren wrote:
> MKlinke wrote:
> > On Thursday 09 October 2003 10:41, Aly Dharshi wrote:
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>So how do you sort out the passwd when ssh asks for one, do you
> >> have it in some secret file
On Friday 10 October 2003 09:07, Rahul Amaram (2K-86) wrote:
> Hi,
> I am a student working as a lab assistant in my institute. We are
> facing some real prob. with respect to the proxy server/gateway over
> here.
>
> The proxy server also acts as a gateway. Now this problem is mainly
> conce
On Thursday 09 October 2003 10:41, Aly Dharshi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> So how do you sort out the passwd when ssh asks for one, do you have
> it in some secret file ?
>
'ssh-agent' is one option for this..
%eval `ssh-agent`
%ssh-add
This will store and apply the key when required.
Regards,
>
> However, I should come clean. I can only do this with tcpdump, as I
> can not install any other software on this box for reasons outside
> the scope of this conversation. Is there any way to accomplish
> reading HTTP headers with tcpdump only from a CLI?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Christian
tcpdump -
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 10:42, Christian Campbell wrote:
> Could anyone advise how I can use tcpdump to read http headers
> through one of my interfaces? I can't use ethereal as the server I'm
> on does not have a GUI installed. Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Christian
>
One o
On Tuesday 07 October 2003 23:50, vijaya wrote:
> Hi all,
> Is anyone aware of any software tools or products (open source)
> similar to the Symantec Ghost for Wins in Linux for cloning images
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Vijaya
Will 'dd' or 'parted' work for your problem?
Regards, Mike Klinke
-
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 02:02, David Barkman wrote:
> Well I've got Postfix up and running great from my local network. I
> run into a problem when I have a remote user trying to send email
> using my server as their smtp server. In /var/log/maillog, I get the
> following:
>
> Oct 7 23:48:3
On Tuesday 07 October 2003 07:49, David Barkman wrote:
> Hi, I recently setup Postfix on RH 9. I'm still having trouble
> connecting to the mail server with Outlook Express though. The only
> way to get outlook to work is to set it to use SSL and port 995,
> which is very good. I'm pretty sure i
On Thursday 02 October 2003 01:49, Mike Klein wrote:
> Can one person respond (on list?) as to whether others are getting
> this email (is it really on list?).
>
> I have only had one question answered and it was a loong time ago.
>
> Sometimes my emails appear to be on list (at least on my end) an
On Wednesday 01 October 2003 07:32, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 08:15, Nathalie Boulos wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > i'm using rsync with ssh to connect to a remote host
> > and mirror a website.
> >
> > I want to put the command in crontab and i don't want
> > ssh to ask for password be
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 17:42, Wayne Call wrote:
> When attempting to execute a cvs commit command, I receive the
> following error:
>
> cvs commit: failed to create lock directory for '\mnt\ .'
>
> I have created a mount using the smbmount command as follows:
>
> smbmount //WORKGROUP//VOL
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 16:19, Jason Williams wrote:
> Hello folks.
>
> Running RH 7.3. The machine im working with has never been
> registered. So im attempting to run rhn_register, but im getting SSL
> Connect error.
>
> I went to www.redhat.com and d/l the latest rhn_register rpm, ran rpm
>
On Monday 29 September 2003 07:44, dlangschied wrote:
> Chris,
> I have determined that ftp is not running. I asked the IT manager at
> the facility to check to see if the daemon is running in the Gnome
> interface. He does not see anything remotely like an ftp daemon in
> the services list. I wou
On Friday 26 September 2003 14:46, Asbjorn Hoiland Aarrestad wrote:
> I had htaccess working on my previous webserver, running on rh 7.3
>
> After installilng rh 9.0 I never got htaccess to work. (latest apache
> version from up2date)
>
> I have working htaccess files (at least for rh 7.3)
> I have
On Wednesday 24 September 2003 05:08, Pablo Rodriguez Gonzalez wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> How can I measure traffic wasted for every user in a server?
>
> I want to measure all the traffic: http (apache), mail (qmail +
> vpopmail), ftp (pureftpd), ssh, etc.
>
> Thanks in advance.
ntop will chart use fo
On Monday 22 September 2003 19:36, Edward Dekkers wrote:
> Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> > At 12:20 9/22/2003, you wrote:
> >> I'm using a Belkin Omniview switchbox to switch between my linux
> >> and windows PCs at work, but everytime I switch to my linux box
> >> the mouse control goes crazy. [...]
On Saturday 20 September 2003 08:38, Asbjorn Hoiland Aarrestad wrote:
> > AFAIK bridging isn't an option on wireless, at least not for this
> > kind of relay network, if it were then it would be possible to
> > treat all the nodes as a single segment with no need for layer 3
> > routing. But then
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 17:13, Res wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Gerry Doris wrote:
> > This translates into a major spam loophole since spammers often
> > fake their domains but MTA's like sendmail default to confirming
> > they are at least valid. Now any .com or .net will show up as
> >
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 13:50, Bret Hughes wrote:
> I am surprised no one has commented on the growing storm but I guess
> it really is OT for a redhat list but still may affect administration
> of some systems.
>
> verisign hase decided to abuse their position as the operator of the
> tld .
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 10:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> But the one that I was referring to, what the openssh that was
> released this morrning,
> http://www.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-announce/2003-September
>/64.html
>
> Wed Sep 17 01:13:10 EST 2003
>
> This new v
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 09:56, Keith Olmstead wrote:
> Does anyone know when an rpm is going to be released resolving the
> issues in OpenSSH 3.7.1?
>
> --Keith
It was released yesterday by most everyone who includes OpenSSH in their
distributions including Red Hat.
Regards, Mike Klinke
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 14:04, Jianping Zhu wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 04:45:34PM -0700, Rhugga wrote:
> > Jianping Zhu wrote:
> > >I have a windows xp which has 120GB HDD. I have a redhat7.1
> > > machine. I want to using rsync to back up redhat to winxp, how
> > > can i do that?
> >
On Monday 15 September 2003 19:02, Marcos S. Trazzini wrote:
> I'm Using fetchmail to synch some accounts with remote POP3 servers.
>
> But if I set then to "keep" the messages on server, fetchmail
> download the already downloaded messages on the next run !!!
>
> This result in a lot of repeated m
On Sunday 14 September 2003 21:22, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> > MKlinke wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> The technique you describe below builds a new bootable image on the
> destination disk. I would assume that the destination disk would have
> to be partitioned exactly the same
On Monday 15 September 2003 09:53, Nick White wrote:
> Hi redhat-list,
>
> I have a quick sendmail question. A server sits between our internal
> mail server, and the external world that acts as a mail receiver and
> relay box. We do this using the mailertable file. So any mail for
> [EMAIL PROT
>
> By address of other machine do you man IP address?
Yes.
> Do I need to add static ARP entries for this to work?
No.
> If I boot with the bootnet.img, I will then have to configure IP once
booted, correct?
Yes.
Your questions lead me to believe you may not be familiar with "nc." It
i
On Saturday 13 September 2003 10:29, Rhugga wrote:
> Just a couple of questions.
>
> 1) How can I mirror a disk using dd??? It has been years since I did
> since and I have only done it on Solaris.
>
> 2) Has any tried using ghost to clone systems using Grub as the boot
> loader? I seem to remember
On Saturday 13 September 2003 09:38, Rudolf Amirjanyan wrote:
> Hello List,
> Can you recommend something of what to do if a want to stop my named
> by making /etc/init.d/named restart, I get the the following:
> Stopping named: named: already [EMAIL PROTECTED] hostname root]#
> And when I do
>
> [
On Friday 12 September 2003 03:27, Sasa Stupar wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have a strange problem. When I request at my terminal under gnome
> desktop "$ man ftpaccess" the terminal crashes. This happens only for
> this demand. I can wiev all others manuals axcept this one.
>
> By the way error looks like t
On Thursday 11 September 2003 15:40, Brent Herring wrote:
> I would like to restrict DHCP services by workstation MAC address. I
> would like for dhcpd to only respond to work stations with a known
> MAC address.
>
> I used iptables rules to ACCEPT requests to the DHCP server only from
> the known
On Thursday 11 September 2003 12:21, Christian Campbell wrote:
> Just installed MailScanner/Spamassassin/F-Prot, and all is working
> great! However, I've noticed that if you change Spamassassin
> configuration files, it doesn't take, almost as if MailScanner's
> settings supercede Spamassassin's.
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 12:48, Bret Hughes wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 23:55, MKlinke wrote:
> > On Tuesday 09 September 2003 22:17, Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto
> >
> > wrote:
> > > I guess this is an easy one.. how can I insert / delete
> > >
On Tuesday 09 September 2003 22:17, Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto
wrote:
> I guess this is an easy one.. how can I insert / delete something
> at the beggining of each line of a block in vi? Still can't figure
> it, though there must be at least ten ways.
>
> Thanks in advance
1 of 10 ...
Pla
On Monday 08 September 2003 18:36, Marc Adler wrote:
> * Michael Schwendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-08 12:59]:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:22:58 -1000, Marc Adler wrote:
> > > I'm not sure where to post this, so I'll start here.
> > >
> > >
On Monday 08 September 2003 15:36, Mark Haney wrote:
> Was this meant for this list? If you want, I can give you my list
> too. Especially if you'll pick up the tab. :)
>
Heh! Obviously no, it wasn't meant for this list ...
/note to self..
Fill in the To:
Fill in the To:
Fill in the To:
All,
As you can see below some of the Microsoft Operating System products are
no longer supported without paid contracts or will be obsolete very
soon. Win98 will be obsolete this coming January and security fixes
are no longer being released as of this past June which means we will
have to r
On Monday 08 September 2003 14:06, Joe Polk wrote:
> Does anyone know if in 7.3 if sendmail is compiled in the rpm with
> libmilter support? I'm trying to get spamass-milter working and I
> have it all setup (so I think) but nothing is filtering.
>
> <>
Mine wasn't ...
12:29:31 # sendmail -b
On Monday 08 September 2003 08:59, Don Leeper wrote:
> I have a few redhat web servers and can't get this to work correctly
> on this 9.0 version. I have the http.conf file setup like the others
> to just accept certain users with passwords. I have the "AuthFile"
> setup and can add users and so fo
On Thursday 04 September 2003 20:57, Gunawan wrote:
> Hi,
> How to create a boot disk for RH9?
> Regards,
> Gunawan
Stick a floppy in and use the utility "mkbootdisk."
See "man mkbootdisk" for the particulars.
Regards, Mike Klinke
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
On Monday 01 September 2003 10:39, Sheila R. White wrote:
> sendmail/redhat 7.2
>
> I am trying to understand the theory.
>
> We were hit with sobig worm.
>
> Client are win/98 outlook express users.
> 1. 5 individuals were affected.
> 2. these 5 have their email posted on the company website.
> 3.
On Sunday 31 August 2003 09:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hi all,
>
> i am hoping that someone may have developed a sendmail rule for the
> following case:
>
> i use ximian and have several e-mail addresses/indentities. when i
> send mail to certain addresses, the destination mail server refuses
>
On Saturday 30 August 2003 16:02, Otto Haliburton wrote:
> Why doesn't it work if you give rpm the name with [1] in it that's
> the question. The name shouldn't make any difference if you get it
> right in the rpm.
>
It's possible that the RPM utility parses the command argument line for
version
On Saturday 30 August 2003 01:39, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote:
> First of all, is this dangerous and make my machine vulnerable?
>
> RDB
You should easily be able to duplicate the entry by telnetting into your
web server on port 80 and issue the same or similar GET request. In my
case the URL req
On Friday 29 August 2003 06:42, Haley Crowe wrote:
> One more question...so if I'm getting that .so dependency failed, is
> that something I need to upgrade, or is that kind of telling me that
> the version I'm trying to upgrade to is not for my version of Redhat?
> (sorry, kind of a newbie here)
>
On Thursday 28 August 2003 14:20, Haley Crowe wrote:
> What is the .so file?? Also, the version I was trying to upgrade to
> was showing as being for Redhat 8.0. Are the patches version
> specific like that? Just thinking out loud, trying to determine what
> the .so file is. ;)
Yes, RH8 had
On Thursday 28 August 2003 03:28, Marc Adler wrote:
> * Bret Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-27 17:27]:
> > On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 22:11, Johnie Stafford wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 21:52, MKlinke wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 27 August 2003 21:21, Marc
On Thursday 28 August 2003 02:45, vijaya wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have a website running on windows 2000 and its being hacked ..some
> pages have replaced..I ran a port scan from linux and saw few ports
> open..
>
> What other measures should i take..
>
> The website is on a remote server whcih has 20
On Wednesday 27 August 2003 21:21, Marc Adler wrote:
> I want to have fetchmail start up automatically, because as it is I
> have to type "fetchmail" (twice for some reason) at the shell prompt
> before it goes and fetches my mail. I looked at some of the scripts
> in /etc/init.d, but couldn't figu
>List: redhat-list
>Subject: NFS errors
From: Justin Rush
>Date: 2003-08-21 19:12:02
>[Download message RAW]
>
>Hi,
> After upgrading all the machines to redhat 9 I am now seeing nfs
>errors
>in the logs of my client machines:
>Aug 18 06:46:16 ztrip kernel: nfs: server fromage not
On Saturday 23 August 2003 10:19, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote:
> Thanks for all replies and the information about the DEADBEEF. I did
> considered contacting the ISP, but knowing that it's a foreign
> address, I think Jason is right that it wouldn't help any, if at all.
> That's why I asked for adv
On Saturday 23 August 2003 09:31, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote:
>
> Now, since I know the IP, what can I do about this? Please help me
> with advise.
>
> Thanks a lot.
> RDB
You could send off a note to the administrative contact:
http://www.dshield.org/ipinfo.php?PHPSESSID=7943a05099f4348175eaa32
On Wednesday 20 August 2003 16:54, Lorenzo Prince wrote:
> Blame this one on M$. The message came from an Exchange server.
> Leave it to M$ to report a virus after the virus has already
> propigated. Note that the message in question that had the virus was
> posted to the list long before the
On Wednesday 20 August 2003 03:35, Kanaga sabai wrote:
> hai
>
> we have 5 linux(7.3) machines.
> I'd problem with remote login as root.
> i wants to know can we login as root from the remote
> machine? if yes how to do it.
>
> i tried with rsh and ssh.
> when i tried with ssh ,it shows permission
On Tuesday 19 August 2003 12:05, Graaf Teil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I work with RH 7.3 and with an update op the webserver the kernel is
> also updated.
> Problem afther the update and restart that the server is not working
> anymore.
>
> Now I am at the datacenter and boor the server with the old kernel.
On Tuesday 19 August 2003 10:46, Sean Estabrooks wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 08:53:39 -0400
>
> Mark Bruen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Anyone know how to change the root window background image in KDE
> > on RedHat 9 from the command line so it can be done from a script?
> > Thanks.
> > -Ma
On Sunday 17 August 2003 15:43, rajesh bhimani wrote:
> hi
>
> i have hey, i have got software and is only combitible with linux
> 2.4.5 , 2.4.12 , 2.4.17 , 2.4.19 and i don't wanna build and compile
> and new kernel
>
> so plz let me know , is any of this kernel comes default installed
> with any
On Sunday 17 August 2003 07:12, Thomas E. Dukes wrote:
> > Don't know where the problem is exactly but i did notice some
> > of my messages being silently dropped, others appearing multiple
> > times and others showing up hours after i sent them. I suspect
> > the 28+ hour power outage is cau
On Saturday 16 August 2003 19:54, Thomas E. Dukes wrote:
> I have noticed latley, if I send an email, more than one of the same
> email is sent. It just started this crap.
>
> Anybody seen this before?
>
> TIA
>
> Palmetto Shopper
> http://www.palmettoshopper.com
> Serving all of South Carolina an
On Saturday 16 August 2003 19:10, Robert Canary wrote:
> I've tried tcpdump. However, this is a stealth syn attack. I used
> #>tcpdump -u root -i any port 1080
>
> I can watch the log files as portsentry continues to log the
> attempts, but tcpdump shows nothing.
>
> Any more ideas?
>
Is it pos
On Saturday 16 August 2003 18:14, Robert Canary wrote:
> I am getting continuously hit on port 1080. Nothing is happening
> because the services (proxy) has been disabled, port sentry is seeing
> the attack but it reports "unknown" as the attacker. Most all my
> machines have seen this activity,
On Friday 15 August 2003 15:52, bruce wrote:
> hi ..
>
> a really simple, yet perplexing question.
>
> i'm doing mail with linux
>
> i'm in mail, i'm typing my msg
> i want to get out of the msg, and then send it... how???!!!
>
> what do i type, what character, etc... to send the ms
On Monday 11 August 2003 02:15, anil garrepally wrote:
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
You can subscribe to the list at:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Regards, Mike Klinke
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www
On Thursday 14 August 2003 10:56, Khademul Islam wrote:
> Gerry,
>
> Thanks, it doesn't work on my end, may be the eject function came
> with the CD software.
>
> P.S. I wrote a script to eject from W2k. But I need something just
> for DOS shell. Like you reboot your system and all u have is
> dos.
On Thursday 14 August 2003 11:41, Robert Williams wrote:
> I have created a directory that is shared using 'owner.group' access
> on a directory. rwilliams.mygroup is set on database directory.
> Since Redhat uses rwilliams.rwilliams for the user/group as default,
> it is causing me some trouble.
On Saturday 09 August 2003 06:02, Robert C. Paulsen Jr. wrote:
> One of the things SuSE supplies is a tool called YAST which (among
> lots more) gives one a way to select packages for installation or
> removal.
>
> I am looking for the equivalent utility in RedHat. The closest I can
> find is "Add/
On Monday 11 August 2003 10:41, Gordon wrote:
> I've noticed that in most of the spam that makes it through the
> sender uses a from address of something legitimate like aol.com or
> msn.com or whatever. I already block email if the domain doesn't
> exist at all. Can anyone tell me if it's possible
On Saturday 09 August 2003 09:31, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> After much discussion on this list about portmap and fam_sig, I
> turned portmap back on to see what would happen. I have not had port
> 111 requests in my logs for a long time, but guess what, someone
> wants to look at my portmap:
>
> [EMAIL
On Friday 08 August 2003 03:20, Kelerion wrote:
> Guys...
>
> I've had an idea for a "play project" I can work on at home in my
> spare time.. but before I start on it I need a few ideas..
>
> Can anyone come up with a theory on how to "convert an mp3 into a
> number"? I know that sounds weird so I
On Monday 11 August 2003 11:39, Gordon wrote:
> Ed Wilts wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 11:41:15AM -0400, Gordon wrote:
> >>I've noticed that in most of the spam that makes it through the
> >> sender uses a from address of something legitimate like aol.com or
> >> msn.com or whatever. I already
On Wednesday 06 August 2003 10:07, teddy wrote:
> I'm sending this email because I've spent countless hours trying to
> figure out why the .htaccess on my webserver doesn't do anything at
> all. I've read some tutorials and howtos on how to get password
> protection on different parts of my website
On Wednesday 06 August 2003 13:34, snort bsd wrote:
> two basic questions regarding linux networking:
>
> 1) what is manual command for deleting an ip address
> from an physical interface? tried "ifconfig eth0 del
> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx" and seemed that it doesn't have any
> effect. which file controls
On Sunday 03 August 2003 17:25, Alex wrote:
> Does anybody know what is this and what would be the cause+fix for
> something like this?
>
> Forged DCC command from 192.168.254.26: 82.xxx.xxx.xxx:1799
>
> Thanks
Will this fit the circumstances? If not, I'm not going to be much more
help but it ma
On Saturday 02 August 2003 02:19, Buz Davis wrote:
> Sorry if this is as dumb as I feel, but I haven't been successful at
> digging out
> an answer.
>
> I would like a routine to read the keyboard and report the single key
> pressed,
> and give me control back without waiting for ENTER to be presse
On Friday 01 August 2003 08:10, Raghuraj, Ajay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question on CVS. Basically i want to shutdown my pserver and
> take a backup of the repositories. I want to schedule this in a
> script. The CVSPSERVER is in /etc/xinetd.d . How do i go about it
>
> Thanks,
> Ajay
One possi
On Thursday 31 July 2003 15:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Assuming that 4clevelands.com is your "home address domain" does
> > that maillog show any clues?
>
> I don't believe I have access to those, but I'll find out.
>From your response to Steve's message (telnet) it looks like you are not
On Thursday 31 July 2003 13:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My head's becoming awfully bruised from banging it on my desk. I'm
> hoping someone can help me out. I've got a redhat 9 box running
> sendmail, spamassassin, and mailscanner. When I send an email from
> that box to my exchange s
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 14:35, John McKinney wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, MKlinke wrote:
> Mike,
>
> > On Tuesday 29 July 2003 13:03, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > While I appreciate your sent
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 13:03, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 12:30:10 -0500, MKlinke wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> It would be polite if you moved your "Re: List has died!" thread
> into private mail,
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 12:46, Matthew Galgoci wrote:
> > It's been at least that long since 67.153.21.10 mail server has
> > been the axsi.com mail server, probably closer to 5 months when it
> > was made primary according to the MX record. The 64.81.113.223 MX
> > record was added at the end of
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 12:37, Gerry Doris wrote:
> > I'd be interested if anyone else resolves axsi.com mail server at
> > 67.153.21.8
> >
> > Regards, Mike Klinke
>
> I just did a lookup on axsi.com and got back 67.153.21.8.
>
> Gerry
Was that authoritive?
Regards, Mike Klinke
--
redhat-lis
> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=mail.futzin.com[64.81.113.223],
> delay=8664, status=sent (250 2.0.0 h6TH7Qlq026218 Message accepted
> for delivery)
>
> Looks like its delivering nicely now.
>
> Matt
>
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, MKlinke wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 July
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 11:52, you wrote:
> Did someone twiddle with your MX records recently? It's possible
> that the expiration time has not been reached?
>
> I've restarted postfix, maybe that will cause postfix to refresh.
>
The restart seems to have done the trick, I am now receiving the ma
ading the
> list archives online ;)
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthew Galgoci
>
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, MKlinke wrote:
> > As of yesterday afternoon the list mail has stopped flowing here.
> >
> > List admin, will we need to re-subscribe or are you on a path to
> > fix th
As of yesterday afternoon the list mail has stopped flowing here.
List admin, will we need to re-subscribe or are you on a path to fix
this? I can see there's list mail today at:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-list/2003-July/date.html
and I also note that others have also seen their
On Monday 28 July 2003 15:11, pnelson wrote:
> SMTP1 is different.
>
> What can happen is that because SMTP2 accepts relays from SMTP1 it
> will accept local mail, but SMTP2 will send outbound mail also.
>
> Steve didn't note the complete configuration, just mailertable.
>
> If I could understand
On Monday 28 July 2003 14:22, pnelson wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 11:26, Cowles, Steve wrote:
> > use sendmail's mailertable feature. i.e.
> >
> > # cd /etc/mail
> > # cat mailertable
> > mydomain.comesmtp:[ip or fqdn of internal mail server]
> >
> > # make
> >
> > Obviously, you need to
On Monday 28 July 2003 07:40, Cowles, Steve wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > containing prohibited content (SYM:23953231121286250666)
> >
> >
> > Subject of the message: RE: getting dns ip automatically
> > Recipient of the message: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> You've got
On Sunday 27 July 2003 10:15, James Gibbon wrote:
> After a trawl through some of the sendmail-related info in the 'Red
> Hat Linux Support Knowledgebase' at redhat.com, I appear to have
> found a solution for my queueing outgoing mail problem - (original
> post below).
>
> I entered my hostname in
On Saturday 26 July 2003 19:10, Tom Pollerman wrote:
> Hello,
> I just received the e-mail below. The file attachment scans
> positive for the Bugbear virus by F-prot.
>
> /root/Mail/inbox/448->emails.doc.pif Infection: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I've sent a message about it to Nick White.
>
On Friday 25 July 2003 16:10, James Gibbon wrote:
> MKlinke wrote:
> > Has something changed between the time Brian tried and my attempt
> > today? And, if so, does your mail now work?
>
> No to both - I've always been able to resolve virgin.net on my
> box - fetchmai
>
> I don't know or recall what versions of sendmail I've previously
> used, but basically what comes out of the box with Suse 8.1, Redhat
> 6.2, 7.3, Mandrake 8.0, 8.1, 9.0, 9.1.
>
> However, I don't think what you've typed here applies in my case -
> DNS clearly CAN resolve virgin.net, otherwis
On Friday 25 July 2003 13:28, James Gibbon wrote:
> Brian Ashe wrote:
> > As a quick check I see that mail.virgin.net does not have a
> > reverse lookup. So...
> >
> > You can try to add "FEATURE(accept_unresolvable_domains) dnl" to
> > your sendmail.mc and create a new sendmail.cf and see if that
On Friday 25 July 2003 10:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok, I found it !
> But I don't understand.
> The problem was that I was looking at the ifcfg-eth scripts in
> /etc/sysconfig/network-script/
> But the ifcfg-eth script that the service read are in
> /etc/sysconfig/networking/device/
> I've ch
1 - 100 of 239 matches
Mail list logo
