On Monday 13 October 2003 15:58, Edward Croft wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 14:43, David C. Hart wrote:
> > I'm trying to get two cards in a server to cooperate. Here's the
> > routing table which is slightly abbreviated for display:
> >
> > Kernel IP routing table
> > Destination Gateway Genmask         Flags   Use Iface
> > 192.168.0.0 *       255.255.255.0   U       eth1
> > 192.168.0.0         *       255.255.255.0   U       eth1
> > 169.254.0.0 *       255.255.0.0     U       eth1
> > 127.0.0.0   *       255.0.0.0       U       lo
> > default             router  0.0.0.0         UG      eth1
> > default             router  0.0.0.0         UG      eth0
> >
> > If I'm reading this correctly, network sends are over device eth1.
> > I need to change this to eth0 but all attempts at "route del . . ."
> > result in an "invalid" modification. I assume that Bind created the
> > 169.254.0.0 entry. Ultimately, I want all traffic going out on
> > eth0.
>
> If I read you correctly, all traffic should route through eth0. Check
> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1. Make sure there is no
> GATEWAY line. If there is comment it out or delete it, otherwise that
> route will continue to come back.
> To delete that route manually, try
> route del default dev eth1
>
> As far as 169.254, is that net used anywhere on your network? What is
> the router's IP?

The 169.254..... address is an automatically assigned IP address.  See 
www.zeroconf.org.  This feature was added in RH9.  See the archives for 
how to disable it; search for NOZEROCONF.

Regards,  Mike Klinke


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to