On Saturday 16 August 2003 19:54, Thomas E. Dukes wrote:
> I have noticed latley, if I send an email, more than one of the same
> email is sent. It just started this crap.
>
> Anybody seen this before?
>
> TIA
>
> Palmetto Shopper
> http://www.palmettoshopper.com
> Serving all of South Carolina and beyond!
> Palmetto Politics
> http://www.palmettoshopper.com/politics/
I noticed that Sean Estabrooks has had one piece of mail delivered to
the list multiple times but from looking at the headers for the two
messages below, my guess would have been that the problem is something
at rogers.com; see the entries below:
(fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.72])
and/or
(fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.74])
Regards, Mike Klinke
---------------
Received: from mail.futzin.com (dsl081-113-223.dfw1.dsl.speakeasy.net
[64.81.113.223]) by exchange.axsi.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange
Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2656.59)
id PLS0GR1G; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 12:14:57 -0500
Received: from hormel.redhat.com (hormel.redhat.com [66.187.233.30])
by mail.futzin.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h7GHHp8P024267
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 12:17:52 -0500
Received: from listman.back-rdu.redhat.com (listman.back-rdu.redhat.com
[10.10.2.136])
by hormel.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 2F4CA782B9; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 13:16:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com
[172.16.52.254])
by listman.back-rdu.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
h7GHFaN21982
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 16 Aug 2003
13:15:36 -0400
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h7GHHGC05095
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 13:17:16
-0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31])
by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h7GHHGs05089
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 13:17:16 -0400
Received: from fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com
(fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.74])
by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h7GHHFt16064
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 13:17:16 -0400
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Received: from linux1.classroom.com ([24.102.213.195])
by fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com
(InterMail vM.5.01.05.12 201-253-122-126-112-20020820) with
ESMTP
id
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 15 Aug 2003 23:01:45 -0400
From: Sean Estabrooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ]# chmod - operation not permitted
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at
fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [24.102.213.195] using ID
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at Fri, 15 Aug 2003 23:01:45 -0400
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
Precedence: junk
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list.redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-list/>
X-Original-Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 23:02:21 -0400
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 23:02:21 -0400
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=3.5
tests=IN_REP_TO,MAILTO_WITH_SUBJ,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,X_LOOP
version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
Status: R
X-Status: N
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 17:20:30 -0300
Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sean Estabrooks wrote
>
> > The permissions will not change when you list them but if
> > you just _try_ you'll see they aren't enforced either.
> > A regular user will be able to create files in the directory.
>
> > Hey Herculano,
> >
> > dmask only applies to directories. depending on what you are trying
> > to do it might have been enough. since you are trying to edit
> > existing files you also need additional *mask options. Take
> > a look at the man page for mount.
>
> Yeah, but alo didn't exist - it was a new file. I tried fmask=0,
umask=0..
> I'll keep trying but any suggestions welcome
>
> Thanks
>
> --
Hi Herculano,
Did you solve this yet ? The following worked here:
mount /dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy -orw,umask=0,fmask=0,dmask=0
Cheers,
Sean
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
---------------
Received: from mail.futzin.com (dsl081-113-223.dfw1.dsl.speakeasy.net
[64.81.113.223]) by exchange.axsi.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange
Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2656.59)
id PLS0GRKY; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 18:48:52 -0500
Received: from hormel.redhat.com (hormel.redhat.com [66.187.233.30])
by mail.futzin.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h7GNpl8P025034
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 18:51:48 -0500
Received: from listman.back-rdu.redhat.com (listman.back-rdu.redhat.com
[10.10.2.136])
by hormel.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id D23DB7829F; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 19:50:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com
[172.16.52.254])
by listman.back-rdu.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
h7GNn6N03910
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 16 Aug 2003
19:49:06 -0400
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h7GNolb20060
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 19:50:47
-0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31])
by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h7GNols20056
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 19:50:47 -0400
Received: from fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com
(fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.72])
by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h7GNokt05449
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 19:50:46 -0400
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Received: from linux1.classroom.com ([24.102.213.195])
by fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com
(InterMail vM.5.01.05.12 201-253-122-126-112-20020820) with
ESMTP
id
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 15 Aug 2003 23:01:45 -0400
From: Sean Estabrooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ]# chmod - operation not permitted
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at
fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [24.102.213.195] using ID
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at Fri, 15 Aug 2003 23:01:45 -0400
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
Precedence: junk
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list.redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-list/>
X-Original-Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 23:02:21 -0400
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 23:02:21 -0400
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=3.5
tests=IN_REP_TO,MAILTO_WITH_SUBJ,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,X_LOOP
version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
Status: R
X-Status: N
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 17:20:30 -0300
Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sean Estabrooks wrote
>
> > The permissions will not change when you list them but if
> > you just _try_ you'll see they aren't enforced either.
> > A regular user will be able to create files in the directory.
>
> > Hey Herculano,
> >
> > dmask only applies to directories. depending on what you are trying
> > to do it might have been enough. since you are trying to edit
> > existing files you also need additional *mask options. Take
> > a look at the man page for mount.
>
> Yeah, but alo didn't exist - it was a new file. I tried fmask=0,
umask=0..
> I'll keep trying but any suggestions welcome
>
> Thanks
>
> --
Hi Herculano,
Did you solve this yet ? The following worked here:
mount /dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy -orw,umask=0,fmask=0,dmask=0
Cheers,
Sean
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
