:-)
--
Chuck Mead, csm -AT- moongroup.com, Owner, MoonGroup.com
(Note: html formatted email sent to me is filtered & deleted unread)
GnuPG Public Key Available: http://wwwkeys.us.pgp.net
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, [iso-8859-1] Julian Niño wrote:
> Please, I need information about:
> Yacc
> Lex
http://www.gnu.org
They're both GNU-sponsored, so that will be your best bet. You can also
buy books about them from O'Reilly and Associates.
--
Todd A. Jacobs
CodeGnome Consulting, LTD
_
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Bret Hughes wrote:
> I don't mind it making changes. What I do mind is that there is no
> way to know what changes it is going to make ir has made for that
> matter. IMHO The documentation does a fair job of explaining what the
> various boxes to fill in mean but as mention
> Anyone been able to install the linuxconf-1.24r8-1.i386.rpm file? There's
> a known bug (known by everyone but RH) with linuxconf-1.19r2-4 not
> supporting the LABEL in /etc/fstab, which causes problems when dealing
> with quotas.
> I'd like to upgrade, but I get failed dependencies on older li
Hi,
1) I am seeing messages in /var/log/messages about modprobe not being to load
sound-slot-1 which is the second sound card. Why is it looking
for a second sound card? I just put
alias sound-slot-1 off
in /etc/modules.conf. I guess this should take of it and the
second message related to
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Mike Burger wrote:
> Still looking at the same problem...you have to use the same usernames and
> passwords or set them up in the Samba server.
>
> On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > I can now get Samba to work with my NT Server and 2000 Server, but it s
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Chad Roberts wrote:
>
> Alright, i've come to an impasse concerning ip chains, and would be
> eternally grateful for any help i can get. In short, trying to use ip
> chains to set up a transparent proxy. here is my setup.
>
> cable modem
> 1 linux box
> 1 windows machine
>
Chad Roberts wrote
>
> Alright, i've come to an impasse concerning ip chains, and would be
> eternally grateful for any help i can get. In short, trying to use ip
> chains to set up a transparent proxy. here is my setup.
If I understand what you're wanting, I think the following should work:
Alright, i've come to an impasse concerning ip chains, and would be
eternally grateful for any help i can get. In short, trying to use ip
chains to set up a transparent proxy. here is my setup.
cable modem
1 linux box
1 windows machine
cable modem<--->linux<--->hub<-->windows
LINUX
eth0
ip
Dear Ray,
Thanks for the reponse. Please let me know where should i
add main.cf file and how the sendmail will understand this main.cf file.
Eagerly waiting for your reply
Thanks
K.Deepak
Ray Curtis wrote:
> > "kd" == K Deepak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> kd> Dear
You also need to check /etc/bashrc, ~/.bash_profile, ~/.bashrc to make sure that
path is not overwrote somewhere.
Usually, the last two should be the setting concerns only to yourself, which is
not system wide setting, such as ../ and notorious ./
Good luck!
Liguo (Leo)
Quoting Chandra K Nat
Dear all,
Thanks for all help given...
I think I shd give more clear pictures on why I need this??
Cause I got some program in linux box, which need to be run as batch
process, but need to perform by end user once they completed their daily
job. Which I want, is just to make thier life more easi
Still looking at the same problem...you have to use the same usernames and
passwords or set them up in the Samba server.
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I can now get Samba to work with my NT Server and 2000 Server, but it still
> gives IPC$ in WinME and Win95?
>
> Brian
>
> Well, personally I believe that if you use linuxconf you will soon become
> an expert...from trying to fix the damage that it does to your system.
Agree totally! Linuxconf is pure evil and should be banished. I've had it
destroy things on my system too many times just even from going into the
I can now get Samba to work with my NT Server and 2000 Server, but it still
gives IPC$ in WinME and Win95?
Brian
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Statux wrote:
> check the following:
>
> /etc/profile
> /etc/bashrc
> $HOME/.bashrc
> $HOME/.bash_profile
with regard to startup files, a lot of people overlook the
files /etc/profile.d/*sh, invoked near the bottom of /etc/profile.
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day
Eno River Techn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well, personally I believe that if you use linuxconf you will soon become
> an expert...from trying to fix the damage that it does to your system.
> Either that you you will give up altogether on Linux and go back to
> windows.
>
> Linuxconf is a disaster waiting to hap
Chris wrote:
> OK, stupid question... how the hell do I turn off the automatic "ls" at
> the start of each new shell. In RH 7.0 and in bash.
Uh, there is no automatic 'ls' at the start of any shell as far as I
know. Care to elaborate?
AMK4
--
H | Hi, I'm currently out of my mind. Ple
Please, I need information about:
Yacc
Lex
Thank
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
I don't know if they ever fixed it, but the Linux boot drive had to be
hda, hdb, or hdc (I think hdc was included). hdd was a no go.
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have two HD's /dev/hda and /dev/hdd. HDA consists of two partitions; a
> FAT acting as a WinNT system disk and an
I have two HD's
/dev/hda and /dev/hdd. HDA consists of two partitions; a FAT acting
as a WinNT system disk and an NTFS for file storage. HDD is a RedHat
Linux 6.0 installation on an Intel PIII-450 mHz.
Problem #1:
LILO is intalled in the boot record of HDD and I tried to refer to it usi
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Mike Burger wrote:
> But, for those of us who know how, we can simply edit /etc/fstab to
> remove the labels, can we not?
You can, but except to fix something buggy like linuxconf, I wouldn't. I
ended up replacing the label on /home with /dev/sda11. I can live with an
unmoun
check the following:
/etc/profile
/etc/bashrc
$HOME/.bashrc
$HOME/.bash_profile
there's prolly some line in there with 'ls' on it.
I've never heard anyone mention this (nor do I use RH7 myself).
-Statux
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Christopher Molnar wrote:
> OK, stupid question... how the hell do I
Matt,
My swap is 128 and my phsyical ram is 80mb
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matthew Galgoci
> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 7:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Anyone know what is causing this?
>
>
>
> How bi
On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 02:21:05PM -0800, Bernie Huang wrote:
> Thanks. But when I try "linux init=/bin/bash", it's a
> read-only file system. I tried su to root, but I
> still couldn't change any file. Basically what I want
> to do is to boot my linux up, and uncomment the lines
> that I comme
Thanks. But when I try "linux init=/bin/bash", it's a
read-only file system. I tried su to root, but I
still couldn't change any file. Basically what I want
to do is to boot my linux up, and uncomment the lines
that I commented previously in /etc/services and then
reboot. If all goes well, the
I realize that I didn't see any such option at install time, either.
But, for those of us who know how, we can simply edit /etc/fstab to remove
the labels, can we not?
In the meantime, I'd like to ask the RedHat folk if there is a simpler way
to do said task?
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Jack Bowling w
RH 7.0 on an IBM AMD-K5-2/500, HP DeskJet 600c printer. None of the
default drivers listed in printtool are giving me anything close to
realistic colors. Green and Cyan look identical, and appear to be
blue-green rather than green. Gold is a series of red and white
dots. Yellow is solid white.
** Reply to message from "Ashley M. Kirchner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 11 Mar 2001
13:36:28 -0700
> Jack Bowling wrote:
>
> > Thank you for making my point for me. To repair anything, one would have to know
>the device names of the partitions unless the userland utilities are re-written to
On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 09:42:40AM -0700, Scott Jacobsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| What's the difference between a console and an xterm?
When you're running in text mode (no X11) the console is the tty you're in front
of. An xterm is just another tty, not the console. Just as you won't see
con
Jack Bowling wrote:
> Thank you for making my point for me. To repair anything, one would have to know the
>device names of the partitions unless the userland utilities are re-written to take
>LABEL tags into consideration. So you would have to go back to your notebook at crash
>time and thumb
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, mjs wrote:
> Im running RH 6.2 ...for some reason, on bootup eth0 won't load but after
> bootup I can run modprobe smc-ultra
> ifup eth0
>
> and it brings it up,..no problem and in my modules.conf file I have the
> correct lines
> alias eth0 smc-ultra
>
> so i added the lines
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Scott Jacobsen wrote:
>
> What's the difference between a console and an xterm?
>
> I ask because I'm trying to view kernel messages, and I must use
> xconsole to see them . . . or look at /var/log/messages.
>
> Is there some way for an xterm to look at /dev/console and displ
Hi Mike.
Good to see a few words from you. We depend on 'authorities' and you are seen
as one. So we listen to good people like you.
As to my RH7 installation - I tried various ways to get the installation to
prompt me for the second CD and it never did. I tried installing everything
and eve
Hi MJS,
> and it brings it up,..no problem and in my modules.conf file I have the
> correct lines
> alias eth0 smc-ultra
Maybe you should add a line
options smc-ultra io= irq=
in your modules.conf? Not sure if you need both.
Bye,
qmail is a nice package, but its resource footprint is too hefty for my
tastes. As was noted, before, postfix will also do what he wants, is a
drop in replacement for Sendmail, doesn't have the resource requirements,
and is even easier to configure.
Thanks to Chuck and Jason for turning me onto
Actually, I think that instead of using the "only_from" line in your
/etc/xinetd.d/swat file, you're better off using /etc/hosts.deny and
/etc/hosts.allow.
In the /etc/hosts.deny file, have a line that reads
"swat: ALL"
And in the /etc/hosts.allow file, have a line that reads:
"swat: ip.networ
'swat" won't run until a connection is attempted, and xinetd calls it.
If you're not trying to connect, or aren't connected, you won't see a
"swat" process, anyhow.
Are you 100% sure that xinetd is, indeed running? (I know...probably a
stupid question, but as a tech support guy, I have to start
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Ted Gervais wrote:
> > > Wolverine is a 'good-one' Philip. Sure a lot better than RH7. At least
> > > in my opinion.
> >
> > Could you elaborate a little on this? What is better about Wolverine that
> > wasn't as good in RH7?
>
> Well the way I see Wolverine as being bette
Im running RH 6.2 ...for some reason, on bootup eth0 won't load but after
bootup I can run modprobe smc-ultra
ifup eth0
and it brings it up,..no problem and in my modules.conf file I have the
correct lines
alias eth0 smc-ultra
so i added the lines
/sbin/modprobe smc-ultra
ifup eth0
to my /etc/r
Here, here! I agree, linuxconf sucks wind and is way too buggy for any use
at all, let alone central sysadmin. I can't see why this piece of crap
keeps finding its way back into linux distributions. I apologize for not
knowing the history of linuxconf, but I don't care anyway. This is a good
w
Hello
I was just wondering something. How stuck on sendmail are you. There is
a product called qmail that will do this exactly what you want. There is
file in qmail called smtproutes that you can tell it where to relay to.
It also is a lot less heavy on your system the sendmail without som
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Bob Hartung spewed into the bitstream:
BH>Chuck,
BH> That did it: the "disable" part was wrong. One last question then on with
BH>the learning. In order to enable other address to configure swat, are the ip
BH>addresses comma delimited or can I just use 192.168.14.0/24 an
At approx 3pm this afternoon (US Eastern time) I plan to down the
moongroup server for maintenance. I am unsure how long it will be down
but it's for sure it will be a while as I have to move all the archives
and they are huge! My recommendation... look for MoonGroup again
tomorrow!
What I am doi
Chuck,
That did it: the "disable" part was wrong. One last question then on with
the learning. In order to enable other address to configure swat, are the ip
addresses comma delimited or can I just use 192.168.14.0/24 and get to it
from anywhere on the home network?
Thanks again,
Bob
Chuck
OK, stupid question... how the hell do I turn off the automatic "ls" at
the start of each new shell. In RH 7.0 and in bash.
Thanks,
-Chris
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Bob Hartung spewed into the bitstream:
BH>Response:
BH> As noted xinetd was updated. It seems that swat does not want to
BH>start. ps ax | grep swat lists nothing. If in go into linuxconf and
BH>open the control panel swat is listed but when I check automatic start
BH>up
On Sunday 11 March 2001 12:21, you wrote:
> If you think 7.1beta is so much better, then give us a report. I'm from
> the old school that doesn't upgrade to fresh releases. I've just now
> upgraded to 7.0 because I needed some drivers.
>
> mw
Well if you went to Wolverine instead you would find
Well, personally I believe that if you use linuxconf you will soon become
an expert...from trying to fix the damage that it does to your system.
Either that you you will give up altogether on Linux and go back to
windows.
Linuxconf is a disaster waiting to happen. I changes too many things on
it
Response:
As noted xinetd was updated. It seems that swat does not want to
start. ps ax | grep swat lists nothing. If in go into linuxconf and
open the control panel swat is listed but when I check automatic start
up and then activate changes - linuxconf reports "nothing to do" and it
does no
On Sunday 11 March 2001 11:08, you wrote:
> Hi Ted,
>
> > Wolverine is a 'good-one' Philip. Sure a lot better than RH7. At least
> > in my opinion.
>
> Could you elaborate a little on this? What is better about Wolverine that
> wasn't as good in RH7?
>
> CU
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Bob Hartung spewed into the bitstream:
BH>Hi,
BH> I have set up a new RH7 server as a file and print server
BH>using Samba. I have all the RH updates and errata installed
BH>- esp. xinetd update. I have check the swat configuration
BH>file in /etc/xinetd.d and it looks oka
What's the difference between a console and an xterm?
I ask because I'm trying to view kernel messages, and I must use
xconsole to see them . . . or look at /var/log/messages.
Is there some way for an xterm to look at /dev/console and display
kernel messages?
Can I replace the first line in my
Hi,
I have set up a new RH7 server as a file and print server
using Samba. I have all the RH updates and errata installed
- esp. xinetd update. I have check the swat configuration
file in /etc/xinetd.d and it looks okay. Samba is running.
/etc/services lists port 901 as a swat port. ps ax |
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Ray Curtis spewed into the bitstream:
RC>> "kd" == K Deepak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RC>
RC>kd> Dear All,
RC>kd> I am having a mail-server runningsendmail-8.9.3-20 on
RC>kd> RedHat 6.2 box. Around 100 users are connected to his machine. Actually
RC>kd
If you think 7.1beta is so much better, then give us a report. I'm from the
old school that doesn't upgrade to fresh releases. I've just now upgraded
to 7.0 because I needed some drivers.
mw
Ted Gervais wrote:
>
> On 10 Mar 2001, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
>
> > "Philip Senechal" <[EMAIL P
We are not all Linux experts out here and linuxconf may be a way for
someone to learn Linux or get started using this OS.
Brian
On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 05:20:15PM -0400, Michael Burger wrote:
: You're much better off asking someone at Checkpoint, the vendor from
: which you purchased Checkpoint, or a Checkpoint mailing list.
I'm with Mike on that, but since I've been running the product for more
than a few years, I'll chi
Hi Mikkel,
Thanks for your information. I will check Redhat 7.1 beta-Wolverine and
Mandrake 7.2 as well which I am going to download from the respective websites.
B.R.
Stephen
At 08:26 AM 3/11/2001 -0600, you wrote:
>On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Stephen Liu wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Mikkel,
> >
> > > L
** Reply to message from "Ashley M. Kirchner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 11 Mar 2001
02:44:02 -0700
> Second scenario: Today you set up a machine and you LEAVE those labels in place.
> The partition crashes, big deal, repair it and issue 'mount /usr/local' and you're
>done again (assum
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> Cdrecord should be on the Red Hat CD. I don't think it does
> UDF, but you can check it. I am not sure if there is Linux suport for
> UDF - it is not something I use. I just burn ISO images on standard and
> re-writable CDs.
>
I'm pretty
Hi Ted,
> Wolverine is a 'good-one' Philip. Sure a lot better than RH7. At least
> in my opinion.
Could you elaborate a little on this? What is better about Wolverine that
wasn't as good in RH7?
CU,
Hi Robert,
> how does it make your life more difficult to be able to refer to
> the partition with label, say, "/boot", rather than have to remember
> that it's /dev/hda1.
Well, let me tell you this: If you compare these two lines from /etc/fstab, I
must say I find the first li
On 10 Mar 2001, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> "Philip Senechal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm in the process of downloading the Wolverine ISO's from Red >
> Hat. Does anyone know if Red Hat has an estimated date of final >
> release for this version yet?
>
> We don't preannounce releases
On Sat, 10 Mar 2001, Philip Senechal wrote:
> I'm in the process of downloading the Wolverine ISO's from Red Hat.
> Does anyone know if Red Hat has an estimated date of final release for
> this version yet? Has anyone had any major problems? Is it stable
> enough to start testing on, or should
Hi Jack et all,
> > > >Myself, I go into fstab and change all the LABEL tags
> > > >back to dev entries anyway
> Perhaps this is something that we could make selectable at install time?
I do agree on this. Such an option would be nice. Personally I also do not
like these l
On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 03:24:53AM -0600, David Talkington wrote:
> I appreciate that there are different approaches, and I have no
> problem with making some system functions more robust for the
> uninitiated. I also appreciate that I can choose to eschew
> obfuscation. =)
A quote I've always
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, K.Deepak spewed into the bitstream:
K>Dear Michael,
K>Thanks for the info. I will check out in the
K>moongroup.com site. Let me explain in clearer way as to why i would need
K>this setup. My redhat6.2 box is the mail-server for my 4.0 subnet users .
K
Hi Todd,
> error: failed dependencies:
> libncurses.so.4 is needed by linuxconf-1.24r8-1
> libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 is needed by linuxconf-1.24r8-1
Let me first tell you that I despise linuxconf, and I refuse to use it. It is
*far* to buggy for such a central
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Stephen Liu wrote:
>
> Hi Mikkel,
>
> > Look at cdrecord, and the front end packages for it.
>
> Thanks again for your advice.
>
> Could you please advise me a little bid more where is "cdrecord" ? Is it
> in the CDs (Redhat/Mandrake CDs for installation) or after starting
Dear Michael,
Thanks for the info. I will check out in the
moongroup.com site. Let me explain in clearer way as to why i would need
this setup. My redhat6.2 box is the mail-server for my 4.0 subnet users .
Moreover, this machine also acts as the internal DNS server for my
First, the help. Check out www.moongroup.com, and look at their
archives for the mailhelp list. Lots of good info there, and if you
can't find the answer you need, you can join the mailhelp list and
ask there.
Second, the question; Does it really matter? DNS lookups don't
usually take more th
Usually, it comes up asking for a password to access $IPC when you haven't
added your Windows username and/or password to the samba setup.
On Sat, 10 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> What would cause a IPC$ in SAMBA?, I configured SAMBA with Webmin at
> http://www.webmin.com/webmin/ .
Jack Bowling wrote:
> Um...excuse me. Fdisk and e2fsck are your friends.
Your point?
> I would rather keep fdisk happy rather than diddle around with disk labels.
Neither fdisk, cfdisk, sfdisk, nor e2fsck have anything to do with labels, or the
other way around. Labels come in h
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Jack Bowling wrote:
> ** Reply to message from rpjday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 11 Mar 2001 04:11:48
>-0500 (EST)
>
> > On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, David Talkington wrote:
> >
> > > Jack Bowling wrote:
> > >
> > > >This brings up something which has been bothering me: as far as I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
rpjday wrote:
>using labels for mounting and in /etc/fstab is a *very* good idea,
>as i can tell you from personal experience. if you decide to take
>an existing partition with an ext2 filesystem and split it in
>two for one reason or another, there is a good
** Reply to message from rpjday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 11 Mar 2001 04:11:48
-0500 (EST)
> On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, David Talkington wrote:
>
> > Jack Bowling wrote:
> >
> > >This brings up something which has been bothering me: as far as I can
> > >tell, the standard disk utilities such as fdi
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, David Talkington wrote:
> Jack Bowling wrote:
>
> >This brings up something which has been bothering me: as far as I can
> >tell, the standard disk utilities such as fdisk and e2fsck do not
> >understand the LABEL tags for drive assignations. Is it in the plans to
> >enable t
If it is a dialogue box popping up asking for a password this is
"normal." See the link below. Did you log on to your Windows machine?
If so, did you use a valid username on the Samba server? If so, did you
put in the correct password?
Information about IPC$:
http://samba.linuxbe.org/en/samba/
79 matches
Mail list logo
