Proposal for SVN Cleanup

inadvertently cloning a huge amount of irrelevant data. Annotator and Toree may have their websites in svn. KIE has an empty directory. Every other current podling uses Git. If no one objects I’ll work with Infra to clean this up in a week or two. Best, Dave

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-233) Clean Up Retired Podling Repositories

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17951016#comment-17951016 ] Dave Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-233: --- We have accumulated a large amoun

[jira] [Closed] (INCUBATOR-283) Please delete tag v2.0.0 in incubator-horaedb

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dave Fisher closed INCUBATOR-283. - Resolution: Fixed Fixed a year ago, but not closed. > Please delete tag v2.0.0 in incuba

[jira] [Closed] (INCUBATOR-201) Missing archiver/archives for dev@incubator - is it needed?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dave Fisher closed INCUBATOR-201. - Resolution: Resolved As far as I can tell this is finished. commits@ is now

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-288) svn clone of incubator repo takes > 12 hours

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17950989#comment-17950989 ] Dave Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-288: --- Moving to git is a larger issue du

[jira] [Closed] (INCUBATOR-288) svn clone of incubator repo takes > 12 hours

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dave Fisher closed INCUBATOR-288. - Resolution: Won't Fix > svn clone of incubator repo takes &g

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-288) svn clone of incubator repo takes > 12 hours

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17950987#comment-17950987 ] Dave Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-288: --- When you do a git-svn clone of

Re: [VOTE][IP CLEARANCE] easy-cass-stress

her > questions. Please record that in the xml file in svn. +1 (for clearance) Best, Dave > > Jordan > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 19:44 Paulo Motta wrote: > >> Wanted to bring attention to the question below raised in the incubator >> list[1] in c

Re: [VOTE][IP CLEARANCE] easy-cass-stress

The topic is here. Feel free to forward my question wherever it makes sense. > On Apr 30, 2025, at 8:48 AM, Paulo Motta wrote: > > Dave - is this message directed to the donation proposer or to the > incubator community ? If the former, this may not reach them unless they'r

Re: [VOTE][IP CLEARANCE] easy-cass-stress

, Dave > On Apr 30, 2025, at 8:33 AM, Patrick McFadin wrote: > > +1 > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 8:30 AM Yifan Cai wrote: > >> +1 (nb) >> >> -- >> *From:* Jon Haddad >> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 30, 2025 8:24:44 AM >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache StormCrawler (Incubating) as a Top level Project

+1 (binding) While this is a small PMC 4 of the 5 PMC members are ASF Members. Best, Dave > On Apr 22, 2025, at 11:52 AM, Tim Allison wrote: > > +1 carried over from dev@ > > Thank you, all! > > Tim Allison (IPMC and PPMC) > > On 2025/04/22 05:13:40 Richa

Re: Missing links in the New Podling Proposal template?

I know that when OpenOffice.org was accepted in June, 2011 we had an open signup for Initial Committer. This is how I joined. I do not think that this has been since. Best, Dave > On Apr 20, 2025, at 6:22 PM, Willem Jiang wrote: > > I guess this refers to the different sections of

Re: Stale files under https://incubator.apache.org/projects

Thank you for this fix. > On Apr 20, 2025, at 2:47 PM, sebb wrote: > > On Sun, 20 Apr 2025 at 15:58, sebb wrote: >> >> As the subject says. >> >> The bluemarlin status file [1] was updated some while ago to show that >> the podling retired. However, the generated file [2] does not show >> thi

Re: [DISCUSS] Accept SAFplus into the Apache Incubator

A major concern is that the codebase is currently GPL-2.0 licensed. Converting all of the OpenClovis included code will be needed and some clarity if all of the contributors have allowed OpenClovis to modify the license for their contributions. Best, Dave > On Apr 4, 2025, at 10:47 AM,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Hamilton into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) > On Apr 2, 2025, at 10:25 AM, PJ Fanning wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to call a VOTE to accept Hamilton into the Apache Incubator. > The proposal is: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HamiltonProposal > > And the discussion: > https://lists.apache.or

Re: [VOTE] Accept Texera into the Apache Incubator

’s mentor if want, thanks! >> >> On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 3:01 PM PJ Fanning wrote: >> >>> Thanks Dave. The Incubator Cookbook days 2 or 3 mentors but I guess it >>> can be implied that the champion is assumed not to count in this >>> tally. >>> h

Re: [VOTE] Accept Texera into the Apache Incubator

You only have 2 mentors listed in the proposal. I think that a minimum of 3 are required. > On Apr 1, 2025, at 2:27 PM, PJ Fanning wrote: > > I will add my +1 binding (fanningpj IPMC) > > On 2025/03/31 15:18:12 Cezar Cristian Andrei wrote: >> My vote is: >> +1, bring Texera into the Incubator

Re: Release documentation (was: [ANNOUNCE] Apache OzHera (incubating) 2.2.5-incubating released)

cture their release directory. Some are flat and some have subdirectories for every release. And many have a mix. Best, Dave >> >> Best, >> tison. >> > > --

Re: Use of of "creator of Apache Foo"

Foo”. with a link to the policy. What do people >> think? That looks like spin on the policy. Discussions about the Maturity Model belong on comdev. Best, Dave > On Mar 25, 2025, at 1:36 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > The incubator isn’t creating any new policy he

Re: Use of of "creator of Apache Foo"

to other contributors to curtail their involvement. Time limits are not an appropriate control and could lead to strange gamification. Policing a rule like this may be a worse impact on a community than ignoring it. Best, Dave -

Re: What to do with Pony Mail?

a.o, but that does not happen automatically. > Infra have to request for changes to be made; there may be a charge involved. If Pony Mail retires then would it be to infrastructure repositories? Justin - should there be a “Roll Call” for Pony Mail? Best, Dave > >> Best, >> t

Re: What to do with Pony Mail?

is Pony Mail discussion has nothing to do with what the ASF does going forward. If you wish to discuss this choice then ask the ASF Infra team. Best, Dave > HyperKitty looks much nicer than PonyMail and is well-maintained. > > Here is an example from Fedora: https://lists.fedoraproject.

Re: What to do with Pony Mail?

Hi Tison, > On Mar 20, 2025, at 8:23 AM, tison wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > On Retirement, I have one question: does PonyMail have no more efforts > needed, even regular maintenance? The source for lists.apache.org belongs to the vendor and I believe that the PonyMail Podling’

Re: What to do with Pony Mail?

cal that never release software? Is it needed? I lean towards Retirement, but if the several ASF Members involved want to continue then I would vote for graduation. Best, Dave > > But I’m open to any other suggestions. > > The project has asked for other PPMC members, but even

Re: Clarification on the -1 policy for code changes

th a -1. I think that rather than have an abstract battle on how to vote the proposers should do some work by adding to this examples repository. If it accomplishes what the proposers think it will then having it will help convince the rest of the community, and then the rest of the work can continue

Re: [DISCUSS] running a trial where podlings need to have their names reviewed before they join

eir name and yet they cannot use it at the ASF then it’s only fair to have that happen before spending years in the Incubator. The old policy wasn’t so bad 15 years ago when Incubation time was shorter and resources were less. Best, Dave > > Niall > > > On 2025/03/06 14:45:4

Re: svn commit: r1924250 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml

The enddate and resolution need to be added as well. Please see the numerous examples. > On Mar 9, 2025, at 6:37 AM, ror...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: roryqi > Date: Sun Mar 9 13:37:31 2025 > New Revision: 1924250 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1924250&view=rev > Log: > Change Un

Re: svn commit: r1924250 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml

Nevermind, I see that this has already been corrected. > On Mar 9, 2025, at 11:36 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > The enddate and resolution need to be added as well. Please see the numerous > examples. > >> On Mar 9, 2025, at 6:37 AM, ror...@apache.org wrote: >> >

Re: [DISCUSS] running a trial where podlings need to have their names reviewed before they join

l checkout. This gathers information about all current podlings. Best, Dave > > On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 at 00:17, Kranti K. Parisa wrote: >> >> I think, it makes total sense to do the name search after approval but >> before onboarding, provided the name search can

Re: [MENTORS] March report timeline - reports due March 2025

> On Mar 3, 2025, at 3:07 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > HI Dave, > > This email was generated by a script. I assume that some data the script > relies on has not been updated. And that is strange because podlings.xml is updated and the website is correct. Perhaps one of

Re: [MENTORS] March report timeline - reports due March 2025

> On Mar 2, 2025, at 7:22 PM, jmcl...@apache.org wrote: > > Dates for next board report: > Wed March 05 - Podling reports due by end of day > Sun March 09 - Shepherd reviews due by end of day > Sun March 09 - Summary due by end of day > Tue March 11 - Mentor signoff due by end of day > Wed March

Re: Incubator SVN Clutch Analysis Part-1 CI Failure since 2024-12-01

ache%20HoraeDB%20for%20High-Cardinality%20Metrics%20at%20AntGroup.pdf > > On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 10:14, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> It looks like it is choking on bad data. >> >> Begin Clutch Analysis >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "/tmp/incuba

Re: Incubator SVN Clutch Analysis Part-1 CI Failure since 2024-12-01

for High-Cardinality Metrics at' does not match format '%b %d %Y' If someone wants to take a look. I don’t have cycles tonight. Best, Dave > On Feb 4, 2025, at 5:58 PM, hulk wrote: > > The Jenkins Job Incubator-SVN-Clutch-Analysis-part-1[1] seems broken for a > long ti

Re: Old Incubating Batchee Website & Google Analytics

published. Since this is being done in response to Privacy know that infra is doing a report for Privacy and they will know what to delete. Please file an INFRA jira issue. I took a look in there and if an IPMC member were to go on a wipe out quest then it looks like cleaning out an old

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate incubator report workflow to github

ator Board Report then we need to enable private security and personnel reports. > Thoughts? I’m here if you want someone to review a change. Best, Dave > > Best, > tison. > > Justin Mclean 于2025年2月4日周二 09:12写道： >> >> Hi, >> >>> I'm starting

Re: February 2025 reporting

running “report_runbook.py”. Thanks for providing a clear answer where I could at that moment only provide a clue. Best Regards, Dave > > Kind Regards, > Justin > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsub

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate incubator report workflow to github

be difficult to include. >> >> >> What do you think? The detailed workflow can be discussed later once this >> repository has been set up. My main proposal is to move away from confluence >> and rely on GitHub Actions to reduce the workload we need to manage, mak

Re: February 2025 reporting

are not now committed to svn and > just appear in cwiki. Reports in cwiki are detached from the python scripts. There are instructions in the runbook python script. Best, Dave > > On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 at 14:59, Xuanwo wrote: >> >> Thank you for the information. Please add

Re: [VOTE] Accept Iggy into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) wave > On Jan 31, 2025, at 9:27 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > I'd like to call a VOTE to accept Iggy into the Apache Incubator. > > The proposal is: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Iggy+Proposal > And the discussion: > https://lists.apache.or

Re: [DISCUSS] Iggy Proposal

ents as separate products on their own cycles? Nothing wrong with any answer, I’m really asking with as the ASF VP, Tooling. Best, Dave > On Jan 26, 2025, at 12:22 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > > Hi Apache Incubator, > > We would like to propose a new project: Iggy. > Iggy is

Re: podling security issues

section like any TLP does in their board reports. I can see reporting that they had dealt with a security issue in public before its solution being an issue. I’m not sure if I’m repeating anyone, but for a podling report this can be a simple Yes/No - “Has the podling ever issued a Security A

Re: Seeking a Champion for Hamilton and/or Burr to apply for the Apache Incubator Program

one complains, is >> removal an option? > > Removal is an option if someone does complain. > > If you need ICLAs for contributors depends on how the project handles > copyright, in some cases, copyright is assigned to the entity who owns the > repo, in that case we would o

Re: [VOTE] Accept Hunter into the ASF Incubator

+1 - wave - ipmc > On Nov 21, 2024, at 4:15 AM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > Following the discussion about Hunter started ten days ago > https://lists.apache.org/thread/ojr23ssmxmfsdbnojxg3q02xdl74t75j > and its proposal > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HunterProposal >

Re: [DISCUSS] Hunter Proposal

sis that can decide whether code should be deployed to production. It >> is a young project with already good diversity, and a valued user base, and >> is well positioned for the advantages that belonging in the ASF would >> bring. >> >> Here is the proposal: >>

Re: [DISCUSS][IP CLEARANCE] Apache DataFusion sqlparser-rs

I’ve wondered for many years if the decision to do IP CLEARANCE in the Incubator is the best choice for the Foundation. The whole recording is an arcane xml/forrest based process that is nearly 20 years old. It hasn’t been a burning issue for me, but I wonder. Best, Dave > On Sep 25, 2024,

[DISCUSS][IP CLEARANCE] Apache DataFusion sqlparser-rs

The long-standing tradition for IP CLEARANCE is LAZY CONSENSUS. Thanks, Dave > On Sep 24, 2024, at 9:09 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 7:33 PM Andy Grove wrote: >> >> Apache DataFusion is rec

Re: Podling release without IPMC vote

An important question to ask is if the VOTE on the dev list included 3 of the podling’s Mentors. If it did then it already had 3 +1 IPMC (binding) Votes and the general@ vote should quickly have those carried over by those mentors. Best, Dave > On Sep 9, 2024, at 11:48 AM, Daniel B. Wid

Re: Proposal: Recording votes in podlings

HI Craig, This is a good idea, and would save the secretary time when checking an account request. Having a parsable email saves a large amount of time. Where do you plan to document this prescription? Best, Dave > On Sep 6, 2024, at 2:29 PM, Craig Russell wrote: > > Hi, > &

Re: [VOTE] Accept Polaris into the ASF Incubator

+1 (binding) Best, Dave > On Aug 2, 2024, at 10:26 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Following the discussion about Polaris > (https://lists.apache.org/thread/ymz26dr3bzldbntdgpctbtkb787x311d), > and after updating the proposal based on comments, I woul

Re: [DISCUSS] PolarisProposal to the incubator

people beyond those on this list. But as the saying goes its “six of one and half dozen of another”. Best, Dave > > Kind Regards, > Justin > >> On 2 Aug 2024, at 3:33 am, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> >> Hi Dave, >> >> Thanks for your message. >

Re: [DISCUSS] PolarisProposal to the incubator

t; P.S. The repo landing page/readme has some ASF trademark issues that would be > good to address. That is part of Incubation. Best, Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: [DISCUSS] PolarisProposal to the incubator

oint. They have put thought into their plans and I say let’s VOTE already! Best, Dave > > Kind Regards, > Justin > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubato

Re: [DISCUSS] PolarisProposal to the incubator

> On Jul 30, 2024, at 11:34 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > That's a good question. The main reason is because we wanted people > with Apache experience in the PPMC to mentor the committers and > contributors heading to PPMC as well. > Also,

Re: [DISCUSS] PolarisProposal to the incubator

Hi JB, An interesting project that looks pretty mature. I’m curious about the split between Initial PPMC and initial Committer. In the usual case a new podling will have all of the Initial Committers on the PPMC. Can you tell us why this is not the case with Polaris? Best, Dave > On Jul

Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Liminal podling

+1 (binding) > On Jul 11, 2024, at 6:41 AM, Ayush Saxena wrote: > > +1 (Binding) > > -Ayush > >> On 11 Jul 2024, at 6:50 PM, Xuanwo wrote: >> >> +1 binding. Good luck after retiring. >> >>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024, at 21:16, PJ Fanning wrote: >>> +1 binding - looks like the right decision bas

Re: [QUESTION] Can we use an AGPL components [minio] in OpenServerless?

/resolved.html Best, Dave > On Jul 5, 2024, at 7:11 AM, tison wrote: > >> an optional dependency > > I second Justin's opinion, while "an opt dep" generally means: if you > use it only for test, it should be fine; if you support user to self > deploy or get a pro

Re: Bylaws != Guidelines

Top post, but if my memory serves me properly Guidelines was used because the ASF’s ByLaws - https://www.apache.org/foundation/bylaws.html - must not be overridden by project “bylaws”. Best, Dave > On Jul 3, 2024, at 12:35 PM, Carl Steinbach wrote: > > In 2018, Justin McLean led an

Re: PMC is a committee

t;>>> To be honest, I've never really paid much attention when someone >>>>>>> stated >>>>>>> they're a PMC. I knew what was meant and just auto corrected it >>>>>>> in my head. >>>>>>> I have used,

Re: PMC is a committee

on using other short > forms ;-) No disrespect but doesn’t Deutsch combine words to make longer words so that PMC Member should according to Google Translate be "Mitglied des Projektmanagementausschusses”?! Acronyms nein! Composition ja! Verzeihen Sie mir meine kleine aber! Best

Re: PMC is a committee

oes the phrase Committee Member translate compared to Committee. Best, Dave > > Best, > tison. > > Greg Stein 于2024年7月2日周二 17:05写道： >> >> Hello all, >> >> I am getting really tired of seeing people refer to *MEMBERS* of a PMC as >> "PMCs".

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenServerless into the ASF incubator

+1 (binding) Best, Dave > On Jun 11, 2024, at 8:31 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 10:35 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: >> ...Following the discussion about OpenServerless [1], I'm starting a vote >> to accept OpenServerless i

Re: What is sufficient Incubation notification for Git repos?

on. Best, Dave > On May 25, 2024, at 1:28 AM, tison wrote: > > OK. My major intention is to sync the discussion to the list. If "lazy > consensus" is too eager to use, I'm OK to make it clear that it's still > encouraged for everyone on the list to give more i

Re: [QUESTION] KIE - NPM package names

Here’s my 2 cents. Incubation is a journey, and if there are parts that are yet to be compliant that should be fine. In the end all will be squared away. For the IPMC - should we have something like DISCLAIMER-WIP for binary convenience packaging? Best, Dave > On May 15, 2024, at 1:13

Re: [VOTE] Apache StormCrawler (Incubating) 3.0 Release Candidate 2

Caring over my +1 (Binding) from the dev list VOTE thread. Best, Dave > On May 13, 2024, at 12:41 AM, Richard Zowalla wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I have posted release candidate for the Apache StormCrawler > (Incubating) 3.0 release and it is ready for testing. > > T

Re: [VOTE] Drop the incubator- prefix for podling's GitHub repo name

+0 (binding) wave > On May 7, 2024, at 5:34 PM, Francis Chuang wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > I think this is a pragmatic and well-thought out approach. > > Francis > > On 8/05/2024 10:31 am, tison wrote: >> Hi, >> Following the discussion thread [1], I'd start a vote on the following >> proposa

Re: Verification of download pages and links

Tison, > On Apr 28, 2024, at 12:10 PM, tison wrote: > > Thank you, Dave :D > > It gives a reason. I'm OK with this explanation now so that I won't bring > it to the INFRA. > > Back to the original purpose of this thread, I suggest: > > 1. Go through

Re: Verification of download pages and links

t altered on (or on its way to or from) the mirror, the detached signature and checksums must be served from ASF controlled resources. Whether or not this still makes sense is a discussion for Infra since they are charged with enforcing and supporting the release distribution policy. Best, Dav

Re: Assistance Needed: Editing resilientdb.xml on Apache SVN

27;t think there's a ui like GitHub for reviewing changes > to the svn repository. There is no ui for this. This part of the incubator process is pre-2010. I highly recommend that you use an XML Validator like https://www.w3schools.com/xml/xml_validator.asp to avoid breaking process. Be

Re: Trademarks and incubation (was: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project)

. The VOTE should not be held unless that is demonstrated in the [DISCUSS]. 5. The Board should ask for explicit assurances from the Incubator PMC that the new PMC has or will handle the situation. Best, Dave > > On 2021/12/20 22:50:13 Eya Badal Abdisho wrote: >> Hello Justin, &

Re: [VOTE] The retirement of Apache Milagro

+1 (binding) > On Mar 18, 2024, at 12:44 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > > Hi All, > > Based on discussion[1], I would like to call a vote to retire Apache Milagro. > > Please vote accordingly: > [] +1 approve > [] +0 no option > [] -1 disapprove with a reason > > [1]: https://lists.apache.o

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for HertzBeat

Hi - It’s not a branding conflict unless Hertz has a trademark in class 9. The champion or mentors could do a PODLINGNAMESEARCH and see what VP, Brand thinks. After all hertz is a well known unit of measure: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hertz Best, Dave > On Mar 16, 2024, at 7:51 AM,

Re: [VOTE] Accept StormCrawler Into the ASF Incubator

+1 (binding) Best, Dave > On Mar 12, 2024, at 1:33 PM, PJ Fanning wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Following the discussion about the StormCrawler proposal [1], I am > starting this official vote for the StormCrawler podling. Here is the > proposal: > > https://cwiki.ap

Re: [VOTE] Podling web sites: make (incubator.) optional in podling urls

+1, binding. (I would be stronger and recommend that it not be done at all.) A string DISCLAIMER on the main page should be enough.) > On Mar 12, 2024, at 2:29 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > +1, binding. > > On 3/12/24 19:36, Craig Russell wrote: >> After this discussion >> https://lists.apache.

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StormCrawler

There are options. I helped establish ASF Pelican by converting the main ASF website from the Apache CMS. See GitHub.com/apache/www-site/. I don’t think it needs to be decided in the proposal. It can be decided at he beginning of Incubation. Best, Dave > On Mar 7, 2024, at 1:37 PM, ti

Re: svn commit: r1916128 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/guides/graduation.xml

Hi PJ, This part of the site is only maintained in GitHub. All of content/guides in svn are “historical documents”. The directory should probably be removed. Best, Dave > On Mar 5, 2024, at 7:56 AM, fannin...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: fanningpj > Date: Tue Mar 5 12:56:0

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StormCrawler

I confirm my interest in being a Mentor. Best, Dave > On Mar 3, 2024, at 6:24 PM, PJ Fanning wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I would like to propose StormCrawler [1] as a new Apache Incubator project, > and you can examine the proposal [2] for more details. > > StormCr

Re: Podling web sites: .incubator. required?

podling one checks that the DISCLAIMER is present. Best, Dave > On Feb 28, 2024, at 5:56 PM, sebb wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 15:41, PJ Fanning <mailto:fannin...@apache.org>> wrote: >> >> +1 binding >> Formalises what most podlings are doing anyway

Re: [NOTICE] Incubation Report for February 2024

> On Feb 24, 2024, at 9:35 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > >> On Feb 23, 2024, at 6:44 PM, tison wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to create an Incubation Report page for February 2024 at >> [1], including the following podlings accordin

Re: [NOTICE] Incubation Report for February 2024

runbook.py usage: report_runbook.py [-h] [--apache-id APACHE_ID] --month MONTH report_runbook.py: error: the following arguments are required: —mestonth Best, Dave > > Best, > tison. > > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/February2024 > > -

Re: ASF at Jetbrains

e only issue with the page right now is the missing ASF organization > in the Marketplace, similar to what we have in Github. Who can create > the organization in the Jetbrains Marketplace? IMO You should discuss this with Infra. Maybe start asking on slack .., Best, Da

Re: ResilientDB Bootstrap missing Mailing Lists

eal snapshot. I have ideas. Best, Dave > > On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 00:22, tison wrote: >> >> Hi Mohammad, >> >> For this specific issue, you or your mentors should be able to >> self-serve creating the necessary list on [1]. >> >> As in your proposa

Re: (apache-website-template) branch jekyll created (now f2f8a9e)

, Dave > On Feb 20, 2024, at 3:48 PM, tison wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > Thanks for picking up this commit. You may join the discussion at [1]. > > I have all the permission to follow what I want. But since > apache-website-template is technically a foundation-wise repo and I&

Re: (apache-website-template) branch jekyll created (now f2f8a9e)

From the commit email it looks like this repository belongs to the Incubator. > On Feb 14, 2024, at 2:27 AM, ti...@apache.org wrote: > > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > tison pushed a change to branch jekyll > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/

[jira] [Created] (INCUBATOR-282) Modernize Clutch Analysis

Dave Fisher created INCUBATOR-282: - Summary: Modernize Clutch Analysis Key: INCUBATOR-282 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-282 Project: Incubator Issue Type: Improvement

Re: ResilientDB Bootstrap missing Mailing Lists

Hi - Perhaps the podling status file in svn was not properly updated? Best, Dave > On Feb 19, 2024, at 3:51 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > Please have a look at https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/resilientdb.html > > Where are the mailing lists? Where is the websi

ResilientDB Bootstrap missing Mailing Lists

Hi - Please have a look at https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/resilientdb.html Where are the mailing lists? Where is the website? Best, Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: ASF at Jetbrains

Yes, that must happen and record the decision via LAZY CONSENSUS. > On Feb 19, 2024, at 1:14 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > I think we would also want a SGA from Jetbrains and go through [1] for the > donation. > > > 1: > https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 15

Re: [DISCUSS] Procedure for graduating an existing sub project to new top level project

You could also look into how Solr was spun out of Lucene. It would be up to your PMC whether to make the new PMC identical or not. Doing a podling name search on DataFusion does check a box for the board. The best place to continue this discussion is bo...@apache.org Best, Dave Sent from my

Re: [VOTE] Accept Fury Into the ASF Incubator

+1 (binding) Best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 8, 2023, at 3:06 AM, tison wrote: > > Hi Incubator > > Following the discussion [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal of Fury [1], I > am starting this official vote for the Fury project. > > Here is their proposal: &g

Re: svn commit: r1912845 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml

I’m glad we no longer need that hack from over 4 years ago. Best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 7, 2023, at 5:35 PM, sebb wrote: > > It looks like the error occurred in the jbake stage, not anakia. > > It looks like the issue was actually here: > > https://github

Re: Retired podlings not being cleaned up

are in the Attic. It takes a Board Resolution to discontinue a PMC and move responsibility to the Attic. Retired podlings are projects that will never become ASF projects. They are not former ASF projects. IMO It is intentional that retirement of a podling’s website is unclear. Best, Dave Sent

Re: Is llvm exception allowed for incubator projects?

The phrase Apache License with exception … is meaningless the ASF does not allow it under trademarks. Please email tradema...@apache.org for any clarification. If it’s not the Apache License then you can’t call it the Apache License + - or whatever. Best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal of ResilientDB

ommunity. ASF committers need to sign an ICLA and that will determine how many committers. Nothing prevents any of those who don’t sign from contributing. Early in incubation you will need to create a website and you can discuss the history of the project and if they agree those contributors you

Re: svn commit: r1912845 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml

process runs. Please test that and fix if you feel we must use https. Best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 9, 2023, at 5:20 PM, w...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: wave > Date: Mon Oct 9 20:20:04 2023 > New Revision: 1912845 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] pulsar-admin-go

Hi, You need to svn co with https. Best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 11, 2023, at 10:11 PM, Willem Jiang wrote: > > Hi tison, > > You are in the Incubator PMC group. The svn right should be fine for > you. You need to use your Apache ID and password to log in. &

Re: New Mentor Question: IP Clearance

IP Clearance is for existing PMCs as a process separate from incubation. During Incubation it is expected that IP us being built and brought in to the podling. Mentors should ensure that any SGA or IP diligence needed is filed and reported as part of the podling status file. Sent from my iPhone

Re: [DISCUSSION] The retirement of the Apache DataLab (Moving to Apache Attic)

t for them. Best, Dave > On Aug 2, 2023, at 3:10 AM, Ayush Saxena wrote: > > +1 > > -Ayush > >> On 02-Aug-2023, at 2:13 PM, PJ Fanning wrote: >> >> It appears the DataLab community has voted to retire the project. >> >> https://lists.apache.

Re: Incubator project status website failed to build since July 7th

Here is the fix which has worked its way through the clutch and website process. Author: wave Date: Wed Aug 2 12:19:32 2023 New Revision: 1911409 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1911409&view=rev Log: Update the minimum podling count fr

Re: svn commit: r1911409 - /incubator/public/trunk/clutch2.sh

The clutch stopped building because the minimum podling count used to protect from failing jobs went below 25. > On Aug 2, 2023, at 5:19 AM, w...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: wave > Date: Wed Aug 2 12:19:32 2023 > New Revision: 1911409 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1911409&view=re

Re: [MENTORS] August 2023 Incubator report timeline

Thank you! Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 29, 2023, at 7:12 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is the August 2023 Incubator report timeline: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/August2023 > > Wed August 02 -- Podling reports due by end of day > Sun August 06 -- Sheph

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >