Awesome! Thank you!
> On Jul 18, 2025, at 1:10 PM, s...@apache.org wrote:
>
> Author: sebb
> Date: Fri Jul 18 20:10:37 2025
> New Revision: 1927326
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1927326&view=rev
> Log:
> retired and graduated projects should have end dates
>
> Modified:
>incubat
> On Jul 18, 2025, at 9:32 AM, sebb wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Jul 2025 at 17:12, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jul 18, 2025, at 8:51 AM, sebb wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 18 Jul 2025 at 16:43, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>>>
&
> On Jul 18, 2025, at 8:51 AM, sebb wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Jul 2025 at 16:43, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>> Sebb,
>>
>> Thank you for fixing this recently very often forgotten step in changing
>> podlings.xml on graduation.
>>
>> Replying to t
Sebb,
Thank you for fixing this recently very often forgotten step in changing
podlings.xml on graduation.
Replying to the change to remind the whole IPMC.
Best,
Dave
> On Jul 18, 2025, at 5:00 AM, s...@apache.org wrote:
>
> Author: sebb
> Date: Fri Jul 18 12:00:20 2025
&g
+1 (Binding) wave. Carrying one rmy vote.
> On Jul 13, 2025, at 7:46 PM, Alexander Sorokoumov
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Otava 0.6.1-incubating-rc1.
>
> The vote thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tjvwn38m0h13c4w7krjwxwvmxv4yhx1b
> Vote result:
> On Jul 4, 2025, at 2:07 PM, James Daugherty
> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> @Dave - We discussed this topic in the past weekly developer meeting [1].
> We've copied the release artifacts to the incubator location & moved dev
> artifacts to the incubator
compliance with trademark policy.
For example:
1. The banner text "2023-09-06: Drools 10.0.0.Final has been released by KIE
Apache (Incubating) community.” Needs s/KIE Apache/Apache KIE/g
2. There are no trademarks attributions or incubation disclaimers in the footer.
Best,
Dave
> On Jul 3, 2025,
> On Jun 20, 2025, at 5:28 PM, Paul King wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> We (Groovy as sponsors/mentors) are following the general Incubator
> procedures but updating as needed for Groovy being the sponsor:
>
> https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html
>
>
incubator.
Best,
Dave
On 2025/06/20 18:02:03 Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi -
>
> Today I noticed grails here: https://downloads.apache.org/grails/
>
> 1. You voted on two projects at once.
> 2. You did not request a second round of votes on general@incubator.apache.org
> 3. Yo
://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/grails/ to
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/grails/.
Continue with your second round of votes on general@incubator.apache.org
Best,
Dave
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr
+1 wave (binding)
> On Jun 18, 2025, at 5:17 AM, Suyan wrote:
>
> +1 suyanhanx (binding)
>
> Calvin Kirs 于2025年6月17日周二 13:07写道：
>
>> Hello all,
>> Nemo has been incubating since February 4, 2018
>>
>> Since 2020, activity has been low, and the chances of attracting new
>> committers and buil
Carrying over my +1 (binding) wave
https://lists.apache.org/thread/sptl3jlgzgo5n6r9ddvomok7tgpf3mdn
Best,
Dave
> On Jun 13, 2025, at 9:46 PM, Alexander Sorokoumov
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Otava 0.6.0-incubating-rc5.
>
>
Completed. Thanks!
> On May 25, 2025, at 7:01 AM, Sebb wrote:
>
> On 2025/05/22 00:10:43 jmcl...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: jmclean
>> Date: Thu May 22 00:10:43 2025
>> New Revision: 1925734
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1925734&view=rev
>> Log:
>> graduate projects
>>
>> Modif
inadvertently cloning a huge amount of irrelevant data.
Annotator and Toree may have their websites in svn. KIE has an empty directory.
Every other current podling uses Git.
If no one objects I’ll work with Infra to clean this up in a week or two.
Best,
Dave
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17951016#comment-17951016
]
Dave Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-233:
---
We have accumulated a large amoun
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Fisher closed INCUBATOR-283.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed a year ago, but not closed.
> Please delete tag v2.0.0 in incuba
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Fisher closed INCUBATOR-201.
-
Resolution: Resolved
As far as I can tell this is finished. commits@ is now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17950989#comment-17950989
]
Dave Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-288:
---
Moving to git is a larger issue du
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Fisher closed INCUBATOR-288.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
> svn clone of incubator repo takes &g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17950987#comment-17950987
]
Dave Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-288:
---
When you do a git-svn clone of
her
> questions.
Please record that in the xml file in svn.
+1 (for clearance)
Best,
Dave
>
> Jordan
>
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 19:44 Paulo Motta wrote:
>
>> Wanted to bring attention to the question below raised in the incubator
>> list[1] in c
The topic is here. Feel free to forward my question wherever it makes sense.
> On Apr 30, 2025, at 8:48 AM, Paulo Motta wrote:
>
> Dave - is this message directed to the donation proposer or to the
> incubator community ? If the former, this may not reach them unless they'r
,
Dave
> On Apr 30, 2025, at 8:33 AM, Patrick McFadin wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 8:30 AM Yifan Cai wrote:
>
>> +1 (nb)
>>
>> --
>> *From:* Jon Haddad
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 30, 2025 8:24:44 AM
>
+1 (binding)
While this is a small PMC 4 of the 5 PMC members are ASF Members.
Best,
Dave
> On Apr 22, 2025, at 11:52 AM, Tim Allison wrote:
>
> +1 carried over from dev@
>
> Thank you, all!
>
> Tim Allison (IPMC and PPMC)
>
> On 2025/04/22 05:13:40 Richa
I know that when OpenOffice.org was accepted in June, 2011 we had an open
signup for Initial Committer. This is how I joined. I do not think that this
has been since.
Best,
Dave
> On Apr 20, 2025, at 6:22 PM, Willem Jiang wrote:
>
> I guess this refers to the different sections of
Thank you for this fix.
> On Apr 20, 2025, at 2:47 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> On Sun, 20 Apr 2025 at 15:58, sebb wrote:
>>
>> As the subject says.
>>
>> The bluemarlin status file [1] was updated some while ago to show that
>> the podling retired. However, the generated file [2] does not show
>> thi
A major concern is that the codebase is currently GPL-2.0 licensed. Converting
all of the OpenClovis included code will be needed and some clarity if all of
the contributors have allowed OpenClovis to modify the license for their
contributions.
Best,
Dave
> On Apr 4, 2025, at 10:47 AM,
+1 (binding)
> On Apr 2, 2025, at 10:25 AM, PJ Fanning wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE to accept Hamilton into the Apache Incubator.
> The proposal is:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HamiltonProposal
>
> And the discussion:
> https://lists.apache.or
’s mentor if want, thanks!
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 3:01 PM PJ Fanning wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Dave. The Incubator Cookbook days 2 or 3 mentors but I guess it
>>> can be implied that the champion is assumed not to count in this
>>> tally.
>>> h
You only have 2 mentors listed in the proposal.
I think that a minimum of 3 are required.
> On Apr 1, 2025, at 2:27 PM, PJ Fanning wrote:
>
> I will add my +1 binding (fanningpj IPMC)
>
> On 2025/03/31 15:18:12 Cezar Cristian Andrei wrote:
>> My vote is:
>> +1, bring Texera into the Incubator
cture their release directory. Some are
flat and some have subdirectories for every release. And many have a mix.
Best,
Dave
>>
>> Best,
>> tison.
>>
>
> --
Foo”. with a link to the policy. What do people
>> think?
That looks like spin on the policy.
Discussions about the Maturity Model belong on comdev.
Best,
Dave
> On Mar 25, 2025, at 1:36 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The incubator isn’t creating any new policy he
to other contributors to curtail their involvement.
Time limits are not an appropriate control and could lead to strange
gamification. Policing a rule like this may be a worse impact on a community
than ignoring it.
Best,
Dave
-
a.o, but that does not happen automatically.
> Infra have to request for changes to be made; there may be a charge involved.
If Pony Mail retires then would it be to infrastructure repositories?
Justin - should there be a “Roll Call” for Pony Mail?
Best,
Dave
>
>> Best,
>> t
is Pony Mail discussion has nothing to do with what the ASF does going
forward. If you wish to discuss this choice then ask the ASF Infra team.
Best,
Dave
> HyperKitty looks much nicer than PonyMail and is well-maintained.
>
> Here is an example from Fedora: https://lists.fedoraproject.
Hi Tison,
> On Mar 20, 2025, at 8:23 AM, tison wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Retirement, I have one question: does PonyMail have no more efforts
> needed, even regular maintenance?
The source for lists.apache.org belongs to the vendor and I believe that the
PonyMail Podling’
cal that never
release software? Is it needed?
I lean towards Retirement, but if the several ASF Members involved want to
continue then I would vote for graduation.
Best,
Dave
>
> But I’m open to any other suggestions.
>
> The project has asked for other PPMC members, but even
th a -1.
I think that rather than have an abstract battle on how to vote the proposers
should do some work by adding to this examples repository. If it accomplishes
what the proposers think it will then having it will help convince the rest of
the community, and then the rest of the work can continue
eir name and yet they cannot use it at the ASF then it’s only fair to have
that happen before spending years in the Incubator.
The old policy wasn’t so bad 15 years ago when Incubation time was shorter and
resources were less.
Best,
Dave
>
> Niall
>
>
> On 2025/03/06 14:45:4
The enddate and resolution need to be added as well. Please see the numerous
examples.
> On Mar 9, 2025, at 6:37 AM, ror...@apache.org wrote:
>
> Author: roryqi
> Date: Sun Mar 9 13:37:31 2025
> New Revision: 1924250
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1924250&view=rev
> Log:
> Change Un
Nevermind, I see that this has already been corrected.
> On Mar 9, 2025, at 11:36 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> The enddate and resolution need to be added as well. Please see the numerous
> examples.
>
>> On Mar 9, 2025, at 6:37 AM, ror...@apache.org wrote:
>>
>
l checkout. This gathers information about all current
podlings.
Best,
Dave
>
> On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 at 00:17, Kranti K. Parisa wrote:
>>
>> I think, it makes total sense to do the name search after approval but
>> before onboarding, provided the name search can
> On Mar 3, 2025, at 3:07 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> HI Dave,
>
> This email was generated by a script. I assume that some data the script
> relies on has not been updated.
And that is strange because podlings.xml is updated and the website is correct.
Perhaps one of
> On Mar 2, 2025, at 7:22 PM, jmcl...@apache.org wrote:
>
> Dates for next board report:
> Wed March 05 - Podling reports due by end of day
> Sun March 09 - Shepherd reviews due by end of day
> Sun March 09 - Summary due by end of day
> Tue March 11 - Mentor signoff due by end of day
> Wed March
ache%20HoraeDB%20for%20High-Cardinality%20Metrics%20at%20AntGroup.pdf
>
> On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 10:14, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>> It looks like it is choking on bad data.
>>
>> Begin Clutch Analysis
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "/tmp/incuba
for High-Cardinality Metrics at' does not match format
'%b %d %Y'
If someone wants to take a look. I don’t have cycles tonight.
Best,
Dave
> On Feb 4, 2025, at 5:58 PM, hulk wrote:
>
> The Jenkins Job Incubator-SVN-Clutch-Analysis-part-1[1] seems broken for a
> long ti
published.
Since this is being done in response to Privacy know that infra is doing a
report for Privacy and they will know what to delete. Please file an INFRA jira
issue.
I took a look in there and if an IPMC member were to go on a wipe out quest
then it looks like cleaning out an old
ator Board Report then we need to enable
private security and personnel reports.
> Thoughts?
I’m here if you want someone to review a change.
Best,
Dave
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
> Justin Mclean 于2025年2月4日周二 09:12写道：
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> I'm starting
running “report_runbook.py”.
Thanks for providing a clear answer where I could at that moment only provide a
clue.
Best Regards,
Dave
>
> Kind Regards,
> Justin
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsub
be difficult to include.
>>
>>
>> What do you think? The detailed workflow can be discussed later once this
>> repository has been set up. My main proposal is to move away from confluence
>> and rely on GitHub Actions to reduce the workload we need to manage, mak
are not now committed to svn and
> just appear in cwiki.
Reports in cwiki are detached from the python scripts. There are instructions
in the runbook python script.
Best,
Dave
>
> On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 at 14:59, Xuanwo wrote:
>>
>> Thank you for the information. Please add
+1 (binding) wave
> On Jan 31, 2025, at 9:27 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE to accept Iggy into the Apache Incubator.
>
> The proposal is:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Iggy+Proposal
> And the discussion:
> https://lists.apache.or
ents as separate products on their own
cycles?
Nothing wrong with any answer, I’m really asking with as the ASF VP, Tooling.
Best,
Dave
> On Jan 26, 2025, at 12:22 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
> Hi Apache Incubator,
>
> We would like to propose a new project: Iggy.
> Iggy is
section like any TLP does in their
board reports.
I can see reporting that they had dealt with a security issue in public before
its solution being an issue.
I’m not sure if I’m repeating anyone, but for a podling report this can be a
simple Yes/No - “Has the podling ever issued a Security A
one complains, is
>> removal an option?
>
> Removal is an option if someone does complain.
>
> If you need ICLAs for contributors depends on how the project handles
> copyright, in some cases, copyright is assigned to the entity who owns the
> repo, in that case we would o
+1 - wave - ipmc
> On Nov 21, 2024, at 4:15 AM, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>
> Following the discussion about Hunter started ten days ago
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/ojr23ssmxmfsdbnojxg3q02xdl74t75j
> and its proposal
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HunterProposal
>
sis that can decide whether code should be deployed to production. It
>> is a young project with already good diversity, and a valued user base, and
>> is well positioned for the advantages that belonging in the ASF would
>> bring.
>>
>> Here is the proposal:
>>
I’ve wondered for many years if the decision to do IP CLEARANCE in the
Incubator is the best choice for the Foundation. The whole recording is an
arcane xml/forrest based process that is nearly 20 years old.
It hasn’t been a burning issue for me, but I wonder.
Best,
Dave
> On Sep 25, 2024,
The long-standing tradition for IP CLEARANCE is LAZY CONSENSUS.
Thanks,
Dave
> On Sep 24, 2024, at 9:09 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 7:33 PM Andy Grove wrote:
>>
>> Apache DataFusion is rec
An important question to ask is if the VOTE on the dev list included 3 of the
podling’s Mentors. If it did then it already had 3 +1 IPMC (binding) Votes and
the general@ vote should quickly have those carried over by those mentors.
Best,
Dave
> On Sep 9, 2024, at 11:48 AM, Daniel B. Wid
HI Craig,
This is a good idea, and would save the secretary time when checking an account
request. Having a parsable email saves a large amount of time.
Where do you plan to document this prescription?
Best,
Dave
> On Sep 6, 2024, at 2:29 PM, Craig Russell wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
&
+1 (binding)
Best,
Dave
> On Aug 2, 2024, at 10:26 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Following the discussion about Polaris
> (https://lists.apache.org/thread/ymz26dr3bzldbntdgpctbtkb787x311d),
> and after updating the proposal based on comments, I woul
people beyond those on this
list. But as the saying goes its “six of one and half dozen of another”.
Best,
Dave
>
> Kind Regards,
> Justin
>
>> On 2 Aug 2024, at 3:33 am, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> Thanks for your message.
>
t; P.S. The repo landing page/readme has some ASF trademark issues that would be
> good to address.
That is part of Incubation.
Best,
Dave
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional
oint.
They have put thought into their plans and I say let’s VOTE already!
Best,
Dave
>
> Kind Regards,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubato
> On Jul 30, 2024, at 11:34 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> That's a good question. The main reason is because we wanted people
> with Apache experience in the PPMC to mentor the committers and
> contributors heading to PPMC as well.
> Also,
Hi JB,
An interesting project that looks pretty mature.
I’m curious about the split between Initial PPMC and initial Committer. In the
usual case a new podling will have all of the Initial Committers on the PPMC.
Can you tell us why this is not the case with Polaris?
Best,
Dave
> On Jul
+1 (binding)
> On Jul 11, 2024, at 6:41 AM, Ayush Saxena wrote:
>
> +1 (Binding)
>
> -Ayush
>
>> On 11 Jul 2024, at 6:50 PM, Xuanwo wrote:
>>
>> +1 binding. Good luck after retiring.
>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024, at 21:16, PJ Fanning wrote:
>>> +1 binding - looks like the right decision bas
/resolved.html
Best,
Dave
> On Jul 5, 2024, at 7:11 AM, tison wrote:
>
>> an optional dependency
>
> I second Justin's opinion, while "an opt dep" generally means: if you
> use it only for test, it should be fine; if you support user to self
> deploy or get a pro
Top post, but if my memory serves me properly Guidelines was used because the
ASF’s ByLaws - https://www.apache.org/foundation/bylaws.html - must not be
overridden by project “bylaws”.
Best,
Dave
> On Jul 3, 2024, at 12:35 PM, Carl Steinbach wrote:
>
> In 2018, Justin McLean led an
t;>>> To be honest, I've never really paid much attention when someone
>>>>>>> stated
>>>>>>> they're a PMC. I knew what was meant and just auto corrected it
>>>>>>> in my head.
>>>>>>> I have used,
on using other short
> forms ;-)
No disrespect but doesn’t Deutsch combine words to make longer words so that
PMC Member should according to Google Translate be "Mitglied des
Projektmanagementausschusses”?! Acronyms nein! Composition ja! Verzeihen Sie
mir meine kleine aber!
Best
oes the phrase Committee Member translate compared to
Committee.
Best,
Dave
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
> Greg Stein 于2024年7月2日周二 17:05写道：
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am getting really tired of seeing people refer to *MEMBERS* of a PMC as
>> "PMCs".
+1 (binding)
Best,
Dave
> On Jun 11, 2024, at 8:31 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 10:35 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>> ...Following the discussion about OpenServerless [1], I'm starting a vote
>> to accept OpenServerless i
on.
Best,
Dave
> On May 25, 2024, at 1:28 AM, tison wrote:
>
> OK. My major intention is to sync the discussion to the list. If "lazy
> consensus" is too eager to use, I'm OK to make it clear that it's still
> encouraged for everyone on the list to give more i
Here’s my 2 cents.
Incubation is a journey, and if there are parts that are yet to be compliant
that should be fine. In the end all will be squared away.
For the IPMC - should we have something like DISCLAIMER-WIP for binary
convenience packaging?
Best,
Dave
> On May 15, 2024, at 1:13
Caring over my +1 (Binding) from the dev list VOTE thread.
Best,
Dave
> On May 13, 2024, at 12:41 AM, Richard Zowalla wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I have posted release candidate for the Apache StormCrawler
> (Incubating) 3.0 release and it is ready for testing.
>
> T
+0 (binding) wave
> On May 7, 2024, at 5:34 PM, Francis Chuang wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> I think this is a pragmatic and well-thought out approach.
>
> Francis
>
> On 8/05/2024 10:31 am, tison wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Following the discussion thread [1], I'd start a vote on the following
>> proposa
Tison,
> On Apr 28, 2024, at 12:10 PM, tison wrote:
>
> Thank you, Dave :D
>
> It gives a reason. I'm OK with this explanation now so that I won't bring
> it to the INFRA.
>
> Back to the original purpose of this thread, I suggest:
>
> 1. Go through
t altered on (or on its way to or from) the mirror, the detached signature
and checksums must be served from ASF controlled resources.
Whether or not this still makes sense is a discussion for Infra since they are
charged with enforcing and supporting the release distribution policy.
Best,
Dav
27;t think there's a ui like GitHub for reviewing changes
> to the svn repository.
There is no ui for this. This part of the incubator process is pre-2010. I
highly recommend that you use an XML Validator like
https://www.w3schools.com/xml/xml_validator.asp to avoid breaking process.
Be
. The VOTE should not be held unless
that is demonstrated in the [DISCUSS].
5. The Board should ask for explicit assurances from the Incubator PMC that the
new PMC has or will handle the situation.
Best,
Dave
>
> On 2021/12/20 22:50:13 Eya Badal Abdisho wrote:
>> Hello Justin,
&
+1 (binding)
> On Mar 18, 2024, at 12:44 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Based on discussion[1], I would like to call a vote to retire Apache Milagro.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
> [] +1 approve
> [] +0 no option
> [] -1 disapprove with a reason
>
> [1]: https://lists.apache.o
Hi -
It’s not a branding conflict unless Hertz has a trademark in class 9.
The champion or mentors could do a PODLINGNAMESEARCH and see what VP, Brand
thinks.
After all hertz is a well known unit of measure:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hertz
Best,
Dave
> On Mar 16, 2024, at 7:51 AM,
+1 (binding)
Best,
Dave
> On Mar 12, 2024, at 1:33 PM, PJ Fanning wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Following the discussion about the StormCrawler proposal [1], I am
> starting this official vote for the StormCrawler podling. Here is the
> proposal:
>
> https://cwiki.ap
+1, binding. (I would be stronger and recommend that it not be done at all.) A
string DISCLAIMER on the main page should be enough.)
> On Mar 12, 2024, at 2:29 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
> +1, binding.
>
> On 3/12/24 19:36, Craig Russell wrote:
>> After this discussion
>> https://lists.apache.
There are options. I helped establish ASF Pelican by converting the main ASF
website from the Apache CMS. See GitHub.com/apache/www-site/. I don’t think it
needs to be decided in the proposal. It can be decided at he beginning of
Incubation.
Best,
Dave
> On Mar 7, 2024, at 1:37 PM, ti
Hi PJ,
This part of the site is only maintained in GitHub. All of content/guides in
svn are “historical documents”.
The directory should probably be removed.
Best,
Dave
> On Mar 5, 2024, at 7:56 AM, fannin...@apache.org wrote:
>
> Author: fanningpj
> Date: Tue Mar 5 12:56:0
I confirm my interest in being a Mentor.
Best,
Dave
> On Mar 3, 2024, at 6:24 PM, PJ Fanning wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to propose StormCrawler [1] as a new Apache Incubator project,
> and you can examine the proposal [2] for more details.
>
> StormCr
podling one checks that the DISCLAIMER is present.
Best,
Dave
> On Feb 28, 2024, at 5:56 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 15:41, PJ Fanning <mailto:fannin...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>
>> +1 binding
>> Formalises what most podlings are doing anyway
> On Feb 24, 2024, at 9:35 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Feb 23, 2024, at 6:44 PM, tison wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to create an Incubation Report page for February 2024 at
>> [1], including the following podlings accordin
runbook.py
usage: report_runbook.py [-h] [--apache-id APACHE_ID] --month MONTH
report_runbook.py: error: the following arguments are required: —mestonth
Best,
Dave
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/February2024
>
> -
e only issue with the page right now is the missing ASF organization
> in the Marketplace, similar to what we have in Github. Who can create
> the organization in the Jetbrains Marketplace?
IMO You should discuss this with Infra. Maybe start asking on slack ..,
Best,
Da
eal snapshot.
I have ideas.
Best,
Dave
>
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 00:22, tison wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mohammad,
>>
>> For this specific issue, you or your mentors should be able to
>> self-serve creating the necessary list on [1].
>>
>> As in your proposa
,
Dave
> On Feb 20, 2024, at 3:48 PM, tison wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> Thanks for picking up this commit. You may join the discussion at [1].
>
> I have all the permission to follow what I want. But since
> apache-website-template is technically a foundation-wise repo and I&
From the commit email it looks like this repository belongs to the Incubator.
> On Feb 14, 2024, at 2:27 AM, ti...@apache.org wrote:
>
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> tison pushed a change to branch jekyll
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/
Dave Fisher created INCUBATOR-282:
-
Summary: Modernize Clutch Analysis
Key: INCUBATOR-282
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-282
Project: Incubator
Issue Type: Improvement
Hi -
Perhaps the podling status file in svn was not properly updated?
Best,
Dave
> On Feb 19, 2024, at 3:51 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
> Please have a look at https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/resilientdb.html
>
> Where are the mailing lists? Where is the websi
Hi -
Please have a look at https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/resilientdb.html
Where are the mailing lists? Where is the website?
Best,
Dave
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional
Yes, that must happen and record the decision via LAZY CONSENSUS.
> On Feb 19, 2024, at 1:14 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> I think we would also want a SGA from Jetbrains and go through [1] for the
> donation.
>
>
> 1:
> https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/
>
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 15
1 - 100 of 1196 matches
Mail list logo
