I would like to update the status report for the Apex project.
Can you please give access to the following user: ThomasWeise
Thanks!
The Apache Apex community is pleased to announce release 3.2.0-incubating
(Apex Core). This is the first release since incubation on 2015-08-17.
Changes:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/blob/v3.2.0-incubating/CHANGELOG.md
Apache Apex is an enterprise grade native YARN big data-in-mo
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Lei Chang wrote:
> Could "LeiChang" be granted access to write to the incubator wiki?
Done.
> I am working on HAWQ Nov report. Thanks!
Great, looking forward to it!
Marvin Humphrey
-
To unsubs
Hi,
Could "LeiChang" be granted access to write to the incubator wiki?
I am working on HAWQ Nov report. Thanks!
Cheers
Lei
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 8:26 PM Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 5:17 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
> > Actually, 5/5 releases were done without the SGA. I'm not too worried
> > about that for a number of reasons.
> >
>
> The missing SGA was a defect in form, but not in substance. All
fwiw it's +9 by my count (24->33). Sentry is security, so by my definition
that's pretty good. ;-)
Patrick
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> All of our projects are primarily in the recruitment business, so it does
> concern
> me that a project that's been here for over a ye
All of our projects are primarily in the recruitment business, so it does
concern
me that a project that's been here for over a year and hasn't managed to
attract
any new talent yet has some issues that need addressing.
But that said I think you might be being a little hard on these guys Joe
for f
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 5:17 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Actually, 5/5 releases were done without the SGA. I'm not too worried
> about that for a number of reasons.
>
The missing SGA was a defect in form, but not in substance. All of the
original code came from eBay who had a strong commitment t
Actually, 5/5 releases were done without the SGA. I'm not too worried
about that for a number of reasons.
1. We imported the full history from the original repository, the podling
has built upon that instead of flattening the commit.
2. The code coming in was already AL v2 compliant, so its real
Hi David,
It was a mis-step of not filing SGA early, but I the issue just being
brought up after several releases had been made and being +1 voted to
go on.
I don't there is nothing we could do to un-do the existing releases.
But the error has been fixed and other than that I do not see any
other
Thanks, Chris!
I have heard back from the Secretary and now
I have put in the requested Apache UID.
Seungwon, Chengxing, Benyang, and Wei need
to submit your ICLA please.
Thanks,
-Lei
On 11/2/15 9:47 AM, "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)"
wrote:
>Hi Lei,
>
>Moving general@i.a.o to BCC and moving thre
Hi John,
Will do and send to board with this adjustment.
Thank you very much.
Luke
Best Regards!
-
Luke Han
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 9:06 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Hi Luke,
>
> At this point, I'd request that my vote remain listed as -1 on the board
> resolution
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Peter Ansell wrote:
> Does Apache use GitHub's "move" repository functionality that adds a
> redirect if the name changes once? If not, is it viable for the
> Commons RDF group to keep their original project (which contains
> directions on how to get to the current
Hi Luke,
At this point, I'd request that my vote remain listed as -1 on the board
resolution.
Thanks,
John
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 8:00 PM Luke Han wrote:
> Hi John,
> In that case, how about to re-send the vote result to count your vote
> to -1? Or would you like to change your mind?
>
>
Hi John,
In that case, how about to re-send the vote result to count your vote
to -1? Or would you like to change your mind?
Back to the license discussion, it's already have been pointed out the
root cause and it's should not an issue now. Google Fonts has agreement
about that, AdminLTE
Heh; yes, you're right. As one of REEF's mentors, I'll add some of my
observations of its community and development.
The REEF project has built an open, welcoming, and diverse community.
>From my sampling of the dev@ list over the last year or so, all design
discussions (including infrastructure,
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015, at 08:28 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On 11/02/2015 01:09 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > Joe, can we see some jira tickets that you find questionable? Hard to tell
> > what the problem is just by scanning the email traffic.
>
> I'll (again) point to the previous conversation th
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>
> ... the reply from
> Arvind which basically says he doesn't consider it an issue if the
> project is "following a roadmap the community does not have control
> over... that too is not an issue in my opinion at all." [2]
>
Joe - I trus
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015, at 04:59 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>
> > On 11/02/2015 04:41 PM, Sravya Tirukkovalur wrote:
> > > I think it is a good sign that community is volunteering to do the
> > release
> > > work.
> >
> > I think the point I'm mak
Hi Joe,
The Commons RDF incubator project has not removed their previous
Github presence yet [1], as it gained a following before the move into
the incubator and we didn't want to break those links prematurely
before people recognised the new location. What we did do when
accepted to the incubator
Hi,
thanks for the vote! Does that mean we should move straight to the IPMC
vote? I understood the incubation guide to first have a [DISCUSS], then
[VOTE] thread.
Markus
On 2015-11-02 13:56, Chris Douglas wrote:
> +1 (binding) -C
>
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Markus Weimer wrote:
>> Hi,
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On 11/02/2015 04:41 PM, Sravya Tirukkovalur wrote:
> > I think it is a good sign that community is volunteering to do the
> release
> > work.
>
> I think the point I'm making is largely being ignored. I'm not seeing
> much room for volunteer
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> On 11/02/2015 06:59 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm one of the mentors of Sentry, which has been in incubation for some
>> time. The project has progressed in a number of ways, but my largest
>> concern is that the podling is
+1 (binding) -C
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Markus Weimer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the Apache REEF podling has discussed[0] and voted upon[1] graduation as
> a TLP. Following the incubation guide[3], we now ask for a feedback on
> our graduation.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Markus
>
> [0]: http://s.apache.org/re
On 11/02/2015 04:41 PM, Sravya Tirukkovalur wrote:
> I think it is a good sign that community is volunteering to do the release
> work.
I think the point I'm making is largely being ignored. I'm not seeing
much room for volunteers, and a lot of indication that
conversations/decisions are happening
I think it is a good sign that community is volunteering to do the release
work.
Here is the formal release work starting email[1] and discussing details on
when to branch and when to release giving sufficient time for everyone who
want to get their favorite jiras in. Dapeng (RM for 1.6.0) also st
On 11/02/2015 03:57 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> I see this (the release discussion threads you linked) as a semi-mature
> community that's well aligned. A number of folks responded to the request
> for discussion and said they were in favor. It was done on the ML in the
> open. What more do we want?
Thanks, Marvin!
Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
Can someone grant me the necessary karma to add my [x] on November's report,
please?
username: JoshElser
Done.
Marvin Humphrey
-
To
Hi,
the Apache REEF podling has discussed[0] and voted upon[1] graduation as
a TLP. Following the incubation guide[3], we now ask for a feedback on
our graduation.
Thanks,
Markus
[0]: http://s.apache.org/reefgraduationdiscussion
[1]: http://s.apache.org/reefgraduationppmsvoteresult
[3]: http://
I see this (the release discussion threads you linked) as a semi-mature
community that's well aligned. A number of folks responded to the request
for discussion and said they were in favor. It was done on the ML in the
open. What more do we want? I don't see anyone excluded and I'm sure if
there wa
On 11/02/2015 01:09 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Joe, can we see some jira tickets that you find questionable? Hard to tell
> what the problem is just by scanning the email traffic.
I'll (again) point to the previous conversation that came out of David's
discussion with Sentry folks at ApacheCon [1]
The Apache Slider team is proud to announce Apache Slider incubation release
version 0.81.1-incubating.
Apache Slider (incubating) is a YARN application which deploys existing
distributed applications on YARN,
monitors them, and makes them larger or smaller as desired - even while the
application
I am part of Sentry community and I do not think we ever had an instance
(in my honest knowledge) where a jira was committed before people had
opportunity to respond/discuss. Most of the communication as I see is on
jira (ideas and design), some on email (roadmap, design, release, doc,
other) and r
Thanks Patrick. I did some poking around in jira and certainly wasn't
able to discern any pattern of misconduct. We do need to distinguish
repair work
from architecture/design decisions, and what I see is a lot of the former
and relatively little of the latter.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Pa
I haven't seen the "quick closing" aside from things like some test
cleanups, even then the average was 5 days. I ran the jira report for
resolution time and it certainly doesn't seem like jiras are being closed
"instantly". Most of these are closed after many (typ. double digit, some
tripple) days
On 11/02/2015 01:51 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 07:25AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
>On 11/01/2015 07:48 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> >Thanks for sending this around, Paul - I should've linked it to the vote
> >thread, duh...
> >
> >Anyway, back to Rich's question: the
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 09:11AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Le 01/11/15 20:30, Rich Bowen a écrit :
> > On Oct 28, 2015 4:26 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote:
> >> Following discussions [1] about its current status, the Groovy community
> >> has voted [2] to graduate from the Incubator. The vote pas
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 07:25AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
> On 11/01/2015 07:48 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> >Thanks for sending this around, Paul - I should've linked it to the vote
> >thread, duh...
> >
> >Anyway, back to Rich's question: the answer is 'yes' as implied by my +1 on
> >the vote.
5 releases of software, and 4 of them before an SGA appeared is troubling.
The code being imported and writable at all at the ASF prior to a
valid SGA being filed appears to be a violation of Incubator policy[1]
This, plus John's comments are troubling and give me pause
--David
[1] http://incuba
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
> Can someone grant me the necessary karma to add my [x] on November's report,
> please?
>
> username: JoshElser
Done.
Marvin Humphrey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubsc
Can someone grant me the necessary karma to add my [x] on November's
report, please?
username: JoshElser
Thanks!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@
Joe, can we see some jira tickets that you find questionable? Hard to tell
what the problem is just by scanning the email traffic.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Vinod Vavilapalli
wrote:
> Missed that part, that sounds really bad.
>
> +Vinod
>
> On Nov 2, 2015, at 9:52 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...
Missed that part, that sounds really bad.
+Vinod
On Nov 2, 2015, at 9:52 AM, Joe Brockmeier
mailto:j...@zonker.net>> wrote:
Discussions are happening out of sight, and - in
Arvind's own words - "as if following a roadmap the community does not
have control over... that too is not an issue in my
Sorry, I missed this email.
No, votes don't automatically convert, at least not in my case.
After my vote was added, there was a release vote of Kylin which raised new
licensing issues. I wouldn't expect a graduating podling to still have
licensing issues.
John
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 8:38 PM
On 11/02/2015 12:27 PM, Vinod Vavilapalli wrote:
> Many of the active TLPs do tend to center all project discussions on JIRA as
> opposed to mailing lists. OTOH, non-code discussions are usually best served
> on mailing lists.
>
> Instead of making it a JIRA vs mailing list discussion, how about
Thanks Ted. Thread moved over to dev@cmda.i.a.o to discuss.
We have a Google Doc spreadsheet tracking that and I think it’s
out of date.
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (39
Hi Lei,
Moving general@i.a.o to BCC and moving thread to
dev@cmda.i.a.o:
Did you ever receive an Apache account? I look at:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lNQUjdBOn1l1WIytXee827esYUMRr3TMO5v
IfoDXP5U/edit#gid=0
And I don’t see it complete. Can folks on the team please
work to get this
Here's an idea: how about you guys fill out the maturity model template?
I really liked how it turned out during the Groovy graduation discussion
and perhaps it can help here as well.
JIRA vs. MLs is but a single facet of how a project practices "Apache Way".
Personally I'd like to see more data p
Many of the active TLPs do tend to center all project discussions on JIRA as
opposed to mailing lists. OTOH, non-code discussions are usually best served on
mailing lists.
Instead of making it a JIRA vs mailing list discussion, how about the podling
be advised about putting a cool-off period fo
What we do here is practice open *development*. That means if it is a
foregone conclusion that some jira ticket gets opened with a patch already
cooked up for it, you're not doing it right. The entire development
process needs to be subject to public scrutiny, not just the end result.
On Mon, N
On 11/02/2015 09:50 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I haven’t looked at what they are doing and don’t expect I will. However, I’m
assuming that jira changes all get to the dev list, as in all other projects
I’ve worked on. I don’t see the point in duplicating a proposal between a jira
issue and a
> On Nov 2, 2015, at 8:08 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/02/2015 06:59 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm one of the mentors of Sentry, which has been in incubation for some
>> time. The project has progressed in a number of ways, but my largest
>> concern is that the podling
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 18 November 2015, 10:30 am PST. The
report
for your podling wil
One of the concerns members are talking about with podlings on github
concerns their overall presence there. To be brief, we need to take a
closer look at any podlings that are using their own project on github
versus using their clone on the apache github project.
So that opens the question I no
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> The VOTE to graduate Groovy to the top-level project has passed...
Congrats!
Great job Groovy team, let me add my belated +1 as a happy Groovy
mentor (retired from that role soon ;-)
(no need to change the tally, you have enough +1s al
Vote has passed with 6 binding votes from :
Luciano Resende,
Henry Saputra,
Chris A Mattmann
Till Westmann
Seetharam Venkatesh
Julian Hyde
And two non-binding votes from:
Arun Manoharan
Madhawa Kasun Gunasekara
and no other votes.
Thanks
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:52 AM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
Ping your project mentors for help.
Also, please verify that all of your project committers and PMC members
have followed the on-boarding process.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 12:07 AM, Pan, Lei (398K)
wrote:
> Hi Ted:
>
> Thanks!
>
> The page says I will first need to submit
> an ICLA, which I did
On 11/02/2015 06:59 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
Hi all,
I'm one of the mentors of Sentry, which has been in incubation for some
time. The project has progressed in a number of ways, but my largest
concern is that the podling is doing [in my opinion] too much
development and discussion out-of-sig
On 11/02/2015 07:53 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
I certainly hope that people don't just blindly vote +1 on graduation
>>threads. I know I don't.
>>
>>Now, if you had asked this same question on the kylin graduation thread,
>>I'm not sure you'd get as solid of an answer as groovy.
>>
>>
>
>
>It f
On Nov 2, 2015 07:43, "Rich Bowen" wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/02/2015 07:33 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:25 AM Rich Bowen wrote:
>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >On 11/01/2015 07:48 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> >Thanks for sending this around, Paul - I should've linked it to
Jira issues are (IMO) a bit too passive to be focal points for community
interaction.
The *active* process of an email arriving in your inbox? Much better for
enabling community members to participate. And a uniform and easy way to do
so. Especially against the *transient* nature of Jira issues. I
On 11/02/2015 07:33 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:25 AM Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
>On 11/01/2015 07:48 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> >Thanks for sending this around, Paul - I should've linked it to the vote
> >thread, duh...
> >
> >Anyway, back to Rich's question: the answ
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:25 AM Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
> On 11/01/2015 07:48 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > Thanks for sending this around, Paul - I should've linked it to the vote
> > thread, duh...
> >
> > Anyway, back to Rich's question: the answer is 'yes' as implied by my +1
> on
> > the vo
On 11/01/2015 07:48 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
Thanks for sending this around, Paul - I should've linked it to the vote
thread, duh...
Anyway, back to Rich's question: the answer is 'yes' as implied by my +1 on
the vote. Why would I be voting for the graduation if I weren't sure the
project
Hi all,
I'm one of the mentors of Sentry, which has been in incubation for some
time. The project has progressed in a number of ways, but my largest
concern is that the podling is doing [in my opinion] too much
development and discussion out-of-sight.
I've raised issues about this, as has David
Le 01/11/15 20:30, Rich Bowen a écrit :
> On Oct 28, 2015 4:26 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote:
>> Following discussions [1] about its current status, the Groovy community
>> has voted [2] to graduate from the Incubator. The vote passed [3] with 12
> +1s
>> total, 5 are binding:
>>
>> Guillaume
Hi Ted:
Thanks!
The page says I will first need to submit
an ICLA, which I did (see email confirmation
below), and then I will "be asked for a
preferred Apache user name," and "will
receive an email when your account has
been created."
Who will be asking me for a preferred user name
please? Sinc
67 matches
Mail list logo
