On 11/02/2015 12:27 PM, Vinod Vavilapalli wrote: > Many of the active TLPs do tend to center all project discussions on JIRA as > opposed to mailing lists. OTOH, non-code discussions are usually best served > on mailing lists. > > Instead of making it a JIRA vs mailing list discussion, how about the podling > be advised about putting a cool-off period for JIRA resolutions - 24-36hrs > before they get closed. Again, this is something a bunch of active TLPs > practice in the interest of leaving enough time windows for everyone (many > times around the world in different time-zones) to pitch in.
It's not merely a Jira vs. mailing list discussion - please re-read the original message. Discussions are happening out of sight, and - in Arvind's own words - "as if following a roadmap the community does not have control over... that too is not an issue in my opinion at all." (Note Arvind is also a mentor for the project.) This is not just "Jira vs. Mailing list" this is "where are discussions happening, and can the community outside the existing group effectively participate?" The answer is clearly *no*. It boggles my mind that anyone would argue for this as an Apache project, especially a mentor. But that's why I brought this to the Incubator list - as a sanity check.* As best I can tell, Sentry development is largely guided outside Apache infrastructure and that's not acceptable - at least as I understand what we are trying to achieve. * A sanity check on this specific issue. I'm not inviting the Incubator to comment on my sanity in general, I can guess the answer already. ;-) -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
