On Nov 2, 2015 07:43, "Rich Bowen" <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > > > > On 11/02/2015 07:33 AM, John D. Ament wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:25 AM Rich Bowen<rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: >> >>> > >>> > >>> >On 11/01/2015 07:48 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>>> >>>> > >Thanks for sending this around, Paul - I should've linked it to the vote >>>> > >thread, duh... >>>> > > >>>> > >Anyway, back to Rich's question: the answer is 'yes' as implied by my +1 >>> >>> >on >>>> >>>> > >the vote. Why would I be voting for the graduation if I weren't sure the >>>> > >project is ready? Looks like a rhetorical question, this one. >>> >>> > >>> >No, it's not a rhetorical question at all. I suspect, as I have >>> >mentioned in other threads, that some people vote +1 on these things >>> >without doing a whole lot of background checking. Paul's response is >>> >what I was looking for. >>> > >>> >If it's all just rhetorical questions then why do we bother at all? >>> >Graduation is a one-time thing. We can afford to apply a little >>> >additional scrutiny to it. This is something we can't afford to get wrong. >>> > >> >> I certainly hope that people don't just blindly vote +1 on graduation >> threads. I know I don't. >> >> Now, if you had asked this same question on the kylin graduation thread, >> I'm not sure you'd get as solid of an answer as groovy. >> >> > > > It feels like these two sentiments are at odds with one another, which is a little worrying.
Why's that? /me voted -1 on kylin > > > > -- > Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen > http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >
