On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:25 AM Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
> > > On 11/01/2015 07:48 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > Thanks for sending this around, Paul - I should've linked it to the vote > > thread, duh... > > > > Anyway, back to Rich's question: the answer is 'yes' as implied by my +1 > on > > the vote. Why would I be voting for the graduation if I weren't sure the > > project is ready? Looks like a rhetorical question, this one. > > No, it's not a rhetorical question at all. I suspect, as I have > mentioned in other threads, that some people vote +1 on these things > without doing a whole lot of background checking. Paul's response is > what I was looking for. > > If it's all just rhetorical questions then why do we bother at all? > Graduation is a one-time thing. We can afford to apply a little > additional scrutiny to it. This is something we can't afford to get wrong. > I certainly hope that people don't just blindly vote +1 on graduation threads. I know I don't. Now, if you had asked this same question on the kylin graduation thread, I'm not sure you'd get as solid of an answer as groovy. > > -- > Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen > http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
