On 11/02/2015 04:41 PM, Sravya Tirukkovalur wrote: > I think it is a good sign that community is volunteering to do the release > work.
I think the point I'm making is largely being ignored. I'm not seeing much room for volunteers, and a lot of indication that conversations/decisions are happening off list and being carried back rather than being done entirely openly. > Here is the formal release work starting email[1] and discussing details on > when to branch and when to release giving sufficient time for everyone who > want to get their favorite jiras in. Dapeng (RM for 1.6.0) also started a > jira[2] to track the release work in detail: We might disagree on what constitutes "sufficient time" here - it looks like one week notice for the 1.6.0 branch, and then one week (planned) to release from there. > ". I will say that the only Jira I've seen from outside recently > didn't exactly get a warm reception. [1] Not rejected, just radio silence." > > That is not true, this is just one off instance. It has only been a week > since that jira has been created and I am sure one of us will review it > soon . But there are numerous instances where community was very welcoming > for new contributors and users[3][4][5]. In fact I feel proud to say that > community enabled many folks who filed bugs to also contribute bug fix > patches. OK, fair. I'll assume that's a one-off then, and apologize for missing the other examples. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
