i recently switched over to the trunk of dri since tcl branch is pretty
much no more and after switching over i seem to of found a rather nasty
bug it might of been there before cause i never really did test the tcl
branch as long as i was playing with the trunk today
anyways after playing ut for
--- Alan Hourihane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 09:38:48AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On a separate topic - have you guys thought about replacing the user
> > mailing list with a real newsgroup? Yes, newsgroups are noisy as hell, but
> > they are also fairly easy to b
So, I downloaded the newest mach64 code and installed it.
After fighting with the drm not loading automatically,
and the bit depth being too high *smack*, I got direct
rendering working! :) ~250 fps on glxgears is spiffy--
beats ~60 without DRI.
With that behind me, I decided to get brave. So,
>The challenge with back and depth buffers is being able to allocate
>additional space on the fly (when a window is resized for example). We
>chose a static allocation method over shutting down the application
>after it's already been running. If a good mechanism can be devised for
>addressing t
Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 04:20:47PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
>
>>On 2002.06.13 15:43 Alan Hourihane wrote:
>>
>>>...
>>>
>>>What would be great, is if someone assigned the bugs to relevant
>>>developers. Once someone is assigned to the bug report, they get
>>>emails whene
> > 1.) MK II:
> > _
> > \
> > +-+ |
> > | X11/OpenGL Based Application | |
> > | (Using 3D Direct Rendering) | |
> > +--
Howzit?
> I see that there is a very active development community and three big projects
> in the works (radeon, radeon T&L, and mach64).
Yes I've slowly realise that this is what goes on in the DRI project, a thought has
been rattling around in my head of late of a simple list of who is workin
I intend to look into this problem, probably over the weekend.
I've got at least one test program of my own to exercise this.
Agreed, we shouldn't crash.
-Brian
Jens Owen wrote:
> Brian, do these tests look reasonable to you? We certainly shouldn't
> crash the server, even if they are unreaso
Brian, do these tests look reasonable to you? We certainly shouldn't
crash the server, even if they are unreasonable.
Joe, can your try with the DRI CVS trunk?
Joe Krahn wrote:
>
> I am trying to draw to two windows using one context.
> It works for Mesa, but gives severe artifacts with DRI.
>
On 2002.06.13 17:38 Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> You shouldn't try to make developers work in some specific way ...
I wasn't. I was trying to avoid that a way which has shown just bad
results so far was once more forced upon the developers, and at the same
time suggesting what it seems (IMHO) the
On Thursday 13 June 2002 19:01, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 05:52:59PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
> > On 2002.06.13 17:19 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > >...
> > >
> > >If Dieter is volunteering to go through it - then power to him...
> >
> > Alan, it's not as simple as that. Althou
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 09:38:48AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On a separate topic - have you guys thought about replacing the user
> mailing list with a real newsgroup? Yes, newsgroups are noisy as hell, but
> they are also fairly easy to browse through (especially with a scoring
> newsreader,
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 05:52:59PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2002.06.13 17:19 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >...
> >
> >If Dieter is volunteering to go through it - then power to him...
>
> Alan, it's not as simple as that. Although it's very kind of him to
> volunteer, we all must get to a cons
On 2002.06.13 17:19 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> ...
>
> If Dieter is volunteering to go through it - then power to him...
Alan, it's not as simple as that. Although it's very kind of him to
volunteer, we all must get to a consensus before taking actions.
Do you really think that that consensus exi
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
>
> A system such as bugzilla can address everyone's needs (including Keith's
> and Jens').
The way to address the needs of Keith and Jens is probably to let them
ignore the bug tracking, and have others (maybe the originator, maybe just
somebody else) t
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 04:49:57PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2002.06.13 16:24 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >...
> >
> >What I'm afraid might happen with setting up something like bugzilla,
> >is the much more severe maintenance of it. If that person where to
> >walk away from the project, we're m
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 05:05:05PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 04:46:44PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >
> >>It's not that I'm being lazy when I say I don't want to use it.
> >>
> >>First of all, if someone has a bug they want me to fix, they s
Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 04:46:44PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
>>It's not that I'm being lazy when I say I don't want to use it.
>>
>>First of all, if someone has a bug they want me to fix, they should stick
>>around long enough to have an email conversation about it.
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 04:46:44PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> It's not that I'm being lazy when I say I don't want to use it.
>
> First of all, if someone has a bug they want me to fix, they should stick
> around long enough to have an email conversation about it. I'm doing free
> work for
Leif Delgass wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
>
>>Here's one:
>>
>>On the radeon, the first time a 3d window is created, there is some screen
>>corruption. It's probably the 2d driver getting something wrong.
>>
>>Keith
>>
>
> What sort of corruption? I'm curious because
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Here's one:
>
> On the radeon, the first time a 3d window is created, there is some screen
> corruption. It's probably the 2d driver getting something wrong.
>
> Keith
What sort of corruption? I'm curious because we have a similar problem
with ma
On 2002.06.13 16:24 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> ...
>
> What I'm afraid might happen with setting up something like bugzilla,
> is the much more severe maintenance of it. If that person where to
> walk away from the project, we're much more stuck that where we are
> now with SF. O.k. I admit that the
On Thursday 13 June 2002 17:17, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 04:03:05PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > >On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:13:40PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > >>On Wednesday 12 June 2002 20:53, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > >>[-]
> > >>
> > >>
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 04:20:47PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2002.06.13 15:43 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >...
> >
> >What would be great, is if someone assigned the bugs to relevant
> >developers. Once someone is assigned to the bug report, they get
> >emails whenever it's updated. But that som
On June 13, 2002 07:06 am, Adam Duck wrote:
> > "Slava" == Slava Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Slava> I have an ATI Radeon LE (which is pretty much the same
> Slava> card as the ATI Radeon DDR but only with 32megs of DDR
> Slava> ram not 64).
>
> Slava> Specifically
On 2002.06.13 15:43 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> ...
>
> What would be great, is if someone assigned the bugs to relevant
> developers. Once someone is assigned to the bug report, they get
> emails whenever it's updated. But that someone needs to know who
> to charge with that bug report.
>
> Someone
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 04:03:05PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:13:40PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> >
> >>On Wednesday 12 June 2002 20:53, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >>[-]
> >>
> >>>We really need to clean up the stuff on SF now. Probably about
Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:13:40PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
>
>>On Wednesday 12 June 2002 20:53, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>>[-]
>>
>>>We really need to clean up the stuff on SF now. Probably about 90%
>>>don't even apply now, or should at least be re-tested.
>>>
>>Yes, let
Steven Paul Lilly wrote:
> I thought I would add my vote to the whole debate about what to do with the
> mailing lists and SFBT. I would like both lists to continue and for their
> proper uses to be enforced. I am not a developer or even a power user. I
> just like knowing what is going on with th
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:13:40PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 June 2002 20:53, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> [-]
> > We really need to clean up the stuff on SF now. Probably about 90%
> > don't even apply now, or should at least be re-tested.
>
> Yes, let's start with that.
> There a
I thought I would add my vote to the whole debate about what to do with the
mailing lists and SFBT. I would like both lists to continue and for their
proper uses to be enforced. I am not a developer or even a power user. I
just like knowing what is going on with the development. Having a clear
def
David S. Miller wrote:
>From: "Mike A. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 21:39:23 -0400 (EDT)
>
>Basically, someone has asked for me to default AGPMode to 4 in
>our config file, which I thought was absolutely crazy. The claim
>is that AGP defaulted to
>>
>> Can you check this is correct since the merge of the TCL branch, and
>> post the patch to the list instead of the patch-manager? (which
>> should also die, IMO).
>>
>> Keith
>
>
> I've alredy posted new patch to dri-devel. If sending patches to
> dri-devel is preffered method then you
> Sorry.
>
> The problem was not in the logic of operation but in in use of variable
> 'i' in this loop. After this loop it's value was never greater than
> RADEON_NR_SAREA_CLIPRECTS and this variable is used in other loop (the
> one containing 'smaller' one). It's value after the loop should
Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> --- xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/radeon_ioctl.cWed Jun 12
>> 19:03:59 2002
>> +++ ../build/dri/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/radeon_ioctl.cWed
>> Jun 12 20:01:42 2002
>> @@ -8
Keith Whitwell wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Patches item #567160, was opened at 2002-06-11 02:58
>> You can respond by visiting:
>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300387&aid=567160&group_id=387
>>
>>
>> Category: None
>> Group: None
>> Status: Open
>> Resolution: N
> "Slava" == Slava Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Slava> I have an ATI Radeon LE (which is pretty much the same
Slava> card as the ATI Radeon DDR but only with 32megs of DDR
Slava> ram not 64).
Slava> Specifically:
Slava> Linux misato 2.4.19-pre10 #1 Tue Jun 4 04:4
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, David S. Miller wrote:
>Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 00:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
>From: David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
>Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] Default AGP mode
>
> From: "
From: "Mike A. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 02:58:53 -0400 (EDT)
Ben LaHaise suggested tonigth to me on IRC that perhaps we could
read the AGP mode from the BIOS and set that by default, and also
keep blacklist/whitelists in the drivers/whatever to deal w
On 2002.06.13 08:05 Michael Thaler wrote:
> ...
>
> I had a lot of work to do for my diploma thesis lately, so I did not
> test the mach64-0-0-4 branch. But waht I read on the list lately
> sounds promising. Is the mach64-0-0-4 branch in a useable state now so
> that is worthwhile for a pure user
Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Leif Delgass wrote:
>
>> CVSROOT:/cvsroot/dri
>> Module name:xc
>> Repository:xc/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/
>> Changes by:[email protected]/06/12 20:48:11
>>
>> Log message:
>> Fixed and enbled 2D acceleration. Also ATIDRIInitB
>
>
>
> --- xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/radeon_ioctl.c Wed Jun 12 19:03:59 2002
> +++ ../build/dri/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/radeon_ioctl.c Wed Jun 12 20:01:42
>2002
> @@ -856,14 +856,14 @@
>clear.depth
Hello!
> That's great news, Leif!
I used to test the Mach64-branch on my Sony Vaio which has a 8 MB ATI
Rage Mobility. The mach64-0-0-3 branch worked fine for me and I was
really happy because I got a frame rate of about 25-30 in UT and Q3.
I had a lot of work to do for my diploma thesis lately
43 matches
Mail list logo
