On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 09:35:40AM -0800, Romain Pokrzywka wrote:
> It would have been a good idea to ask a native English speaker before deciding
> on the name, as this is an atrocity, language-wise.
Is it?
But even if so, most of the target audience are not native speakers
of English either...
On 28 November 2012 18:35, Romain Pokrzywka wrote:
> It would have been a good idea to ask a native English speaker before
> deciding on the name, as this is an atrocity, language-wise. I'm not a
> native myself but I can tell this sounds wrong. 'Chose' is definitely not
> the right verb here, you
On quarta-feira, 28 de novembro de 2012 17.43.18, Knoll Lars wrote:
> The repository is now created, so I'd rather not change that (as that's a
> hazzle in gerrit). But we can still choose freely how to call the binary.
> Nobody apart from a few developers and packagers will ever see the
> reposito
The repository is now created, so I'd rather not change that (as that's a
hazzle in gerrit). But we can still choose freely how to call the binary.
Nobody apart from a few developers and packagers will ever see the repository
name anyway.
Cheers,
Lars
On Nov 28, 2012, at 6:35 PM, Romain Pokrz
It would have been a good idea to ask a native English speaker before
deciding on the name, as this is an atrocity, language-wise. I'm not a
native myself but I can tell this sounds wrong. 'Chose' is definitely not
the right verb here, you probably wanted 'select' instead?
On top of that, IMO the
ect: Re: [Development] repository for the toolwrapper
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 02:03:35PM -0200, Thiago A. Corrêa wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen
> wrote:
>>>>
>>> yeah, i think it's a good idea to put it into that re
: [Development] repository for the toolwrapper
qtchooser is ok for me. Sergio, can you help to create the repo, please?
Thanks,
Lars
On Nov 27, 2012, at 3:12 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On terça-feira, 27 de novembro de 2012 11.23.00, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>> qtchooser (i kinda
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 02:03:35PM -0200, Thiago A. Corrêa wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen
> wrote:
> >>
> > yeah, i think it's a good idea to put it into that repo.
> > alternative naming ideas:
> > qtwrapper (that's too undescriptive)
> > qtchooser (i kinda like tha
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen
wrote:
>>
> yeah, i think it's a good idea to put it into that repo.
> alternative naming ideas:
> qtwrapper (that's too undescriptive)
> qtchooser (i kinda like that)
> qtswitcher
> qtdispatcher
> qt-version-manager (j/k)
>
Gentoo has a to
qtchooser is ok for me. Sergio, can you help to create the repo, please?
Thanks,
Lars
On Nov 27, 2012, at 3:12 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On terça-feira, 27 de novembro de 2012 11.23.00, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>> qtchooser (i kinda like that)
>> qtswitcher
>
> I like those two.
>
> So r
On terça-feira, 27 de novembro de 2012 11.23.00, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> qtchooser (i kinda like that)
> qtswitcher
I like those two.
So requesting it as qtchooser. I'll rename the tool to match the repository
name.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - I
On Tuesday 27 November 2012 10:03:11 Nurmi J-P wrote:
> > >> We agreed that the tool wrapper wouldn't live inside qtbase.git nor
> > >> qt.git (Qt 4), so I need a new repository for it. I think it should be
> > >> in the qt/>
> > hierarchy.
> >
> > > Isn't qttools suitable, regardless of its depe
On Tuesday 27 November 2012 11:23:00 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:04:45AM +0100, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 November 2012 10:40:57 Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > > On Monday, November 26, 2012 10:54:54 PM Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > > We agreed that the tool wrap
On 2012/11/27 12:23 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> yeah, i think it's a good idea to put it into that repo.
> alternative naming ideas:
> qtwrapper (that's too undescriptive)
> qtchooser (i kinda like that)
> qtswitcher
> qtdispatcher
> qt-version-manager (j/k)
qtver ?
--
Regards
Alex
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:04:45AM +0100, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 November 2012 10:40:57 Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > On Monday, November 26, 2012 10:54:54 PM Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > We agreed that the tool wrapper wouldn't live inside qtbase.git nor qt.git
> > > (Qt 4), so I need
On Tuesday 27 November 2012 10:40:57 Simon Hausmann wrote:
> On Monday, November 26, 2012 10:54:54 PM Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > We agreed that the tool wrapper wouldn't live inside qtbase.git nor qt.git
> > (Qt 4), so I need a new repository for it. I think it should be in the qt/
>
> >> We agreed that the tool wrapper wouldn't live inside qtbase.git nor
> >> qt.git (Qt 4), so I need a new repository for it. I think it should be in
> >> the qt/
> hierarchy.
> >>
> >
> > Isn't qttools suitable, regardless of its dependency to qtbase?
>
> The goal was to not have any Qt depend
012 7:55
>> To: development@qt-project.org
>> Subject: [Development] repository for the toolwrapper
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> We agreed that the tool wrapper wouldn't live inside qtbase.git nor qt.git
>> (Qt
>> 4), so I need a new repository
On Monday, November 26, 2012 10:54:54 PM Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Hello
>
> We agreed that the tool wrapper wouldn't live inside qtbase.git nor qt.git
> (Qt 4), so I need a new repository for it. I think it should be in the qt/
> hierarchy.
Maybe this is the long awaited return of a now public de
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+jpnurmi=digia@qt-project.org
> [mailto:development-bounces+jpnurmi=digia@qt-project.org] On
> Behalf Of Thiago Macieira
> Sent: 27. marraskuuta 2012 7:55
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: [Developmen
Hello
We agreed that the tool wrapper wouldn't live inside qtbase.git nor qt.git
(Qt 4), so I need a new repository for it. I think it should be in the qt/
hierarchy.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
21 matches
Mail list logo
