> >> We agreed that the tool wrapper wouldn't live inside qtbase.git nor
> >> qt.git (Qt 4), so I need a new repository for it. I think it should be in 
> >> the qt/
> hierarchy.
> >>
> >
> > Isn't qttools suitable, regardless of its dependency to qtbase?
> 
> The goal was to not have any Qt dependencies, so distributions can build it
> without having to build Qt. Reason is simply that they should not be forced to
> build all (most) of Qt 5 to get the wrapper which they use with Qt 4.

Even if the qttools module as a whole depends on qtbase, it doesn't have to 
mean that everything in qttools depends on qtbase. They could still build the 
wrapper alone by simply changing to the appropriate directory and just building 
it.

> So it should be a separate repository. The repo name qt/toolwrapper is not
> ideal, but I can't come up with a better name right now. Anybody?

Having tools in qttools just sounds quite logical to me. :) Having more and 
more repos can also get confusing and make it difficult to find things. Simon's 
suggestion is not bad either, though.

--
J-P Nurmi

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to