On Nov 27, 2012, at 10:32 AM, Nurmi J-P <jpnu...@digia.com> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: development-bounces+jpnurmi=digia....@qt-project.org >> [mailto:development-bounces+jpnurmi=digia....@qt-project.org] On >> Behalf Of Thiago Macieira >> Sent: 27. marraskuuta 2012 7:55 >> To: development@qt-project.org >> Subject: [Development] repository for the toolwrapper >> >> Hello >> >> We agreed that the tool wrapper wouldn't live inside qtbase.git nor qt.git >> (Qt >> 4), so I need a new repository for it. I think it should be in the qt/ >> hierarchy. >> >> -- >> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com >> Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > > Hi, > > Isn't qttools suitable, regardless of its dependency to qtbase?
The goal was to not have any Qt dependencies, so distributions can build it without having to build Qt. Reason is simply that they should not be forced to build all (most) of Qt 5 to get the wrapper which they use with Qt 4. So it should be a separate repository. The repo name qt/toolwrapper is not ideal, but I can't come up with a better name right now. Anybody? Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
