> -----Original Message----- > From: development-bounces+jan-arve.saether=digia....@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+jan-arve.saether=digia....@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of Oswald Buddenhagen > Sent: 27. november 2012 17:13 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] repository for the toolwrapper > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 02:03:35PM -0200, Thiago A. Corrêa wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen > <oswald.buddenha...@digia.com> wrote: >>>> >>> yeah, i think it's a good idea to put it into that repo. >>> alternative naming ideas: >>> qtwrapper (that's too undescriptive) qtchooser (i kinda like that) >>> qtswitcher qtdispatcher qt-version-manager (j/k) >>> >> >> Gentoo has a tool that serves the same purpose and it's called >> eselect, so qselect isn't a bad name IMHO. >> > fine with me. if the other thiago likes it... > >> In Gentoo's case, it's used for gcc, postgres and many other >> packages that can have slots ( multiple version install ). >> It's a shame other distros don't have their own eselect, then it >> wouldn't be necessary for Qt to have it's own. >> > ha. i said excatly that a month ago, without knowing anything about > gentoo's existing solution.
FYI, http://modules.sourceforge.net seems to be in the same alley, but I've never used it. (This was brought up on this mailing list over a month ago) Jan Arve _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
