On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 02:03:35PM -0200, Thiago A. Corrêa wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen > <oswald.buddenha...@digia.com> wrote: > >> > > yeah, i think it's a good idea to put it into that repo. > > alternative naming ideas: > > qtwrapper (that's too undescriptive) > > qtchooser (i kinda like that) > > qtswitcher > > qtdispatcher > > qt-version-manager (j/k) > > > > Gentoo has a tool that serves the same purpose and it's called > eselect, so qselect isn't a bad name IMHO. > fine with me. if the other thiago likes it...
> In Gentoo's case, it's used for gcc, postgres and many other packages > that can have slots ( multiple version install ). > It's a shame other distros don't have their own eselect, then it > wouldn't be necessary for Qt to have it's own. > ha. i said excatly that a month ago, without knowing anything about gentoo's existing solution. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
