Hi,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen
<oswald.buddenha...@digia.com> wrote:
>>
> yeah, i think it's a good idea to put it into that repo.
> alternative naming ideas:
> qtwrapper (that's too undescriptive)
> qtchooser (i kinda like that)
> qtswitcher
> qtdispatcher
> qt-version-manager (j/k)
>
Gentoo has a tool that serves the same purpose and it's called
eselect, so qselect isn't a bad name IMHO.
In Gentoo's case, it's used for gcc, postgres and many other packages
that can have slots ( multiple version install ). It's a shame other
distros don't have their own eselect, then it wouldn't be necessary
for Qt to have it's own.
I guess I'm a bit late, but just my 2c.
Kind Regards,
Thiago A. Correa
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
