AJP 1.5 should support automatic discovery of tomcat backend, new
systems and new webapps.
That's the current need for many of us when adding tomcats / webapp
behind Apache 2 webservers. In such case we need to restart them and
it's sad.
How could it be accomplished, may be via a master tomcat wh
using AJP or HTTP or WHATEVERP protocol you want, the current need for
me in my production systems is to be able to add / remove a tomcat
machine to a LoadBalancing farm without having to restart the Apache 2
web server.
A WEB admin (I work with them each days) would like to add / remove a
tomcat
so the dynamic mapping is the solution, and it seems that's why
original jk developpers decided to handling JkMount by hand.
2005/10/30, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 10/29/05, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > using AJP or HTTP or WHATEVERP prot
oups, bad eclipse manipulation.
Could an admin remove the connectors, container and jasper dirs I
created under tomcat/current/tc5.5.x ?
Sorry for that.
2005/11/14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Author: hgomez
> Date: Mon Nov 14 06:42:56 2005
> New Revision: 344135
>
> URL: http://svn
Thanks :)
2005/11/14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Author: remm
> Date: Mon Nov 14 07:19:03 2005
> New Revision: 344145
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=344145&view=rev
> Log:
> - Try to delete.
>
> Removed:
> tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/connectors/
> tomcat/current/tc5.5.
For now APR support is automatically detected and eventually used.
So no problem for me to have APR and NIO.
2005/11/19, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Tomcat Developers List"
> Sent: Saturday, November 19, 20
Well why so much noise about NIO/APR ?
If some want to experiment APR or NIO, why can't they do their works
on some sort of incubations projets and when stable enough give us
benchmarks results.
Benchmarks/tesings should give us information on :
stability, speed, memory usage, IO usage and of co
+1
Appart the JSP 2.1, TC 6.0 changes will be in which areas ?
>2005/12/21, Tim Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> +0
>
> (+1 - if I can realign my day job duties to free up time to help more :( )
>
> -Tim
>
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Besides adding support for Servlet 2.5 which does not se
2005/12/21, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> For Servlet 2.5, the highlights are:
> Requires 1.5 as minimum Java version.
> Needs to support Annotations (probably the biggest project).
> Some minor changes to Sessions to support Portlets.
> A couple of really minor changes to 'web.xml' p
> Sorry, so far nobody has had the sense to propose returning to the good old
> TC 3.3 Interceptors ;-). It looks like Evolution is here to stay.
I don't know if Interceptors would be a good solutions but I'd really
like to have something similar to Apache modules.
--
al set of valves to have a TCK-accepted container. Modules ==
> > jdbc authenticators, load balancing, ssl, jk, even APR, and anything
> > that could be eventually released or upgraded independently.
> >
> > Costin
> >
> >
> > On 12/21/05, Henri Gomez <
gt; work fine. But I have a feeling I'm the only one interested in this
> > :-). Removing more features to make it really minimal is quite simple,
> > but requires testing and a bit of work. I don't think we need any new
> > code - just small adjustments and different p
2005/12/22, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Henri Gomez wrote:
> > Well a Tomcat will a small memory footprint is also very interesting for me
> > :)
>
> How is Tomcat memory usage large ? Personally, I would think it's
> extremely reasonable given the f
2005/12/22, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Henri Gomez wrote:
> > Well memory is not the only point, faster start and less class to be
> > loaded is also very important for me. In my company we're still using
> > Tomcat 3.3.2 on our production servers (iSerie
> I didn't do any real benchmark, but the single-jar 5.5 should be as
> fast on startup as 3.3.
good
> Less class loaded - and less classes/features you need to worry when
> setting up and maintainig is what I meant by footprint - Jetty is
> around 0.5M I think.
what's the expected class/size f
2005/12/22, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 12/22/05, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Less class loaded - and less classes/features you need to worry when
> > > setting up and maintainig is what I meant by footpri
+0
2005/12/23, Peter Rossbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> +1
>
> Thanks
> Peter
>
> Am 23.12.2005 um 20:28 schrieb Yoav Shapira:
>
> > Hi,
> > Are people ready for a 5.5.15 release? I'd specifically like to know
> > that the showstoppers in 5.5.13 and 5.5.14, e.g. the clustering issue
> > just mention
What about using JMeter ?
Also your test should be from a different computer, may be with 2/3
clients computers against one single server.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC
Did you take a look at jpackage projet www.jpackage.org for prebuild
tomcat 5 Rpms ?
http://www.jpackage.org/rpm.php?id=2772
2006/1/31, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bob Herrmann wrote:
> > seems you need both "ant1.5" and "ant1.5" to compile tomcat 5.0
> >
>
> Come one :)
> I think you hav
+0
PS: Don't have time to work on the iSeries port ;(
2006/2/8, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> There was lots of changes for Tomcat Native that needs a
> new tag and release bump.
> 1. IPV6 support fix
> 2. Bind fix
> 3. sendb(b) fixes
>
> I would like to tag the TOMCAT_NATIVE_1_1_2 l
A solution could be to implement on the client side an AJP 1.3 protocol
2006/2/10, Prabhu Baskaran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi All,
> I wanted to run Socket server program which wud act as a connection to
> another client application which wud provide data from the database...(sort
> of like a clie
2006/2/21, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > No. Bill gave a wrong answer. He ignored in the fact that
> java.io.tmpdirand
> > javax.servlet.context.tempdir are equivalent in implementation in
> Tomcat,
> > and that to be compliant, Tomcat has to make java.io.tmpdir writable.
>
>
> File.c
+1 (please)
2006/2/23, Peter Rossbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sounds very great
>
> +1
>
> many thanks and now I can start very relaxed to my short journey :-)
> Peter
>
>
>
> Am 23.02.2006 um 18:25 schrieb Filip Hanik - Dev Lists:
>
> > Sounds like there is a consensus amongst folks. So to summari
no problem
2006/2/28, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> Because of the critical AJP bugfix found and fixed earlier today, would
> it be possible to plan releasing a new 5.5.16 build soon ?
>
> Sorry for the trouble (once again ...).
>
> Rémy
>
>
Sure, so in this case it's the JNI side, initialize(), which should be
more verbose ?
TCN_IMPLEMENT_CALL(jboolean, Library, initialize)(TCN_STDARGS)
{
UNREFERENCED_STDARGS;
if (!tcn_global_pool) {
if (apr_pool_create(&tcn_global_pool, NULL) != APR_SUCCESS) {
return JNI
Well with a tcnative build against APR 1.2.2, one time dynamically and
another time statically it works.
It recall me the old time of mod_webapp where APR was not available.
In many distributions, including Suse, Apache 2.0.x is bundled and as
such only APR 0.9.x is available.
Could we try to mo
> > [X] Stable (no major issues)
> > [ ] Beta (at least one major issue: please provide details)
> > [ ] Alpha (multiple significant issues: please provide details)
>
>
[X] Stable (no major issues)
And for the majority of users the 1.1.1 sources are useless, they want
and use 1.1.2 binaries provided by Mladen :)
2006/3/16, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yoav Shapira wrote:
> > Hola,
> > The one thing I don't want to do is repackage 5.5.16. The do nothing
> > option is viable, as is just
There is also something to add in tcnative, the support of static link with APR.
Many Linux distributions still provided Apache 2.0.x and APR 0.9.x and
as such people couldn't use tcnative against APR 0.9.x.
2006/3/16, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> And for the majority of u
2006/3/16, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Henri Gomez wrote:
> > There is also something to add in tcnative, the support of static link with
> > APR.
> >
> > Many Linux distributions still provided Apache 2.0.x and APR 0.9.x and
> > as such people
2006/3/16, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Henri Gomez wrote:
> >
> > We could comment how to build an APR 1.2.2 ready for static inclusion
> > (easy).
> > But the configure/makefile of tcnative should be adapted
> >
>
> You have the commit r
7;t find apr static link command for MAC OS X. At MAC OS X
> the tcnative library´suffix must be jnilib instead dylib. How I can
> change this?
>
> peter
>
>
>
> Am 16.03.2006 um 15:15 schrieb Henri Gomez:
>
> > 2006/3/16, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
&
2006/3/16, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 6:40 AM
> > To: Tomcat Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Tomcat v5.5.16 Stabil
Yes EBCDIC is everywhere, even on IBM OS/400 (I5/OS) where using each
day at ... work
2006/3/16, Ian Darwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >>
> >> One of the patches I need to get TC working with JSP in EBCDIC is the
> >> following:
> >>
> >> Any comments?
> >>
> >
> > Yes. Fix your clock. You live in t
+1
2006/3/17, Peter Rossbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> +1 for that,
>
> I can made my tests at weekend.
>
> Regards
> Peter
>
>
>
> Am 17.03.2006 um 12:37 schrieb Mladen Turk:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > There is quite large list of fixed bugs for mod_jk
> > from the 1.2.15:
> >
> > #37469: Fix shared memo
well client and server should be in phase about the buffer size and
the better way to accomplish that will be via AJP13 extensions (ie
AJP14), with connect time negociation datas like packet buffer size :)
2006/4/5, KARNATI, SRINIVASA R [AG/1000] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> >>-Original Messag
6, KARNATI, SRINIVASA R [AG/1000] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 12:57 AM
> >>To: Tomcat Developers List
> >>Subject: Re: configurabl
2006/4/6, Jess Holle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Henri Gomez wrote:
> > Just take a look at the AJP protocol documentation :
> >
> > http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/common/ajpv13a.html
> >
> > Packets sent from the server to the container begin with 0x12
2006/4/6, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jess Holle wrote:
> > Henri Gomez wrote:
> >>
> > We recently saw a customer run into this limitation in that all of their
> > headers, etc, would not fit in the first 8K.
> >
> > Waiting for a new AJP
2006/4/6, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> This thread started (for whatever reason) on the private list as part of
> an unrelated discussion. The point is to see what could be improved to
> make Tomcat more suitable for shared hosting, which is a very nice goal,
> but unfortunately wi
Very interesting stuff
My german is too bad but from what I could see it seems a good candidate.
Could this works be ported back into ASF Tomcat 5.5.x ? Or better
included in ASF Tomcat ?
>2006/4/7, Peter Rossbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hey,
>
> Java/JSP and Tomcat for german hoster is a very ba
2006/4/7, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 2006/4/6, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This thread started (for whatever reaso
And what about a JVM launching others JVMs ?
>From an admin point of vue, only one job/process to start / stop and
monitor, so more simple.
>From a developper point of vue the differents JVM could have the
isolation level required.
2006/4/7, Paul Speed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> Reinhard Moosau
And what about a tcnative which will build against a static APR ?
Many Linux distributions still have APR 0.9 and as such we need to
modify the Makefile to be able to use a static APR build by hand.
>2006/4/14, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The patch is fine, but I'm actually looking for
BTW, memory leak in Tomcat 3.2 are more than likely.
The question will be, why still using deprecated and no more supported code ?
When I visit the IBM Rochester Labs, in 2001, I recommanded some IBMer
to switch to Tomcat 3.3.x, which is the Servlet 2.2/JSP 1.1 RI and is
pretty fast and stable.
We're also using TC 3.3 on our production systems and are switching to TC 5.5.
The memory penalty is real but you'll be using up to date and actively
maintained stuff with TC 5.5.
Also you could try to reduce the AJP13 / HTTP 11 threads and remove
some JMX Listeners
2006/4/19, Abhi Karmos <[EMAI
Well working on a more sofisticated load-balancing front end (using jk
in Apache 2.x or another Tomcat 5.5) could be usefull also.
This kind of load-balancing front end should be able to get load from
the Apache clusters and send requests to the less loaded Tomcat for
example
2006/4/19, Yoav Shap
Hi to all,
I tried to build tcnative 1.1.3 on a Suse SLES 9 where the APR is 0.9.x.
As such I used the following step :
get apr 1.2.7 and tcnative 1.1.3 :
APR 1.2.7 build as static
./configure --enable-shared=no
TCNATIVE against the static APR :
./configure --with-apr=/root/apr-1.2.7/
Probl
Well the extra memory could be a penalty, but what I like to see in
future Tomcat impl, will be support for many instances ready to
massive hosting.
There was a thread about this some weeks ago, with a nice piece of
code from Germany, wonder what we could do to use it or include it in
Tomcat main
ore people
> can test it :-)
>
> Peter
>
>
> Am 26.04.2006 um 09:13 schrieb Henri Gomez:
>
> > Well the extra memory could be a penalty, but what I like to see in
> > future Tomcat impl, will be support for many instances ready to
> > massive hosting.
> >
&
[X] Stable
2006/4/26, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yoav Shapira wrote:
> >
> > Apache Tomcat v5.5.17 is:
> > [X] Stable - no major issues
>
> Regards,
> Mladen.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For addit
Hi to all,
I wonder if there is plan to add compression support for the AJP
connector in Tomcat 5.5.x / 6.x ?
The compression works well on HTTP connector, could it be possible to
add this stuff to the AJP connector.
Apache 2.x could do the compression on the fly, but if the machines
are on a li
Worst, there are still using Tomcat 3.2.4 in iSeries to manage some
HTTP goodies !
2006/4/27, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hola,
> Do we have anyone from IBM here who can tell us what's stopping them
> from using Tomcat 5.5, as opposed to 5.0, for new tools like their Web
> Ontology Manager
Documentation will be a good place for that :)
2006/4/28, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Are you posting this proposal because some people find it too difficult ?
>
I'm posting that because I find it difficult.
I always forget the usernames and roles :)
Anyhow, It's
n Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about: when installing or on first startup generate a random
> password or let the user pick a password ? Not sure if the shutdown
> problem was fixed, but the password could be used there as well.
>
> Costin
>
>
> On 4/28/
May be not related, but did there is plan in TC 6.x to make use at
some time OSGI framework, like the one used in Eclipse and RCP
applications ?
I really like this concept and it seems a good candidate to provide a
modular kernel / micro-architecture.
Regards
2006/5/5, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROT
Well being modular, components oriented won't be bad.
It's not about cloning Geronimo, but allowing tomcat to get more and
more modules and extensions, like does Apache HTTPD
2006/5/5, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Henri Gomez wrote:
> May be not related, but did ther
Well we discuss for Tomcat 6, not Tomcat 5.5
Did there is some deadlines for Tomcat 6 ?
2006/5/5, Peter Rossbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Am 05.05.2006 um 14:13 schrieb Henri Gomez:
> Well being modular, components oriented won't be bad.
>
> It's not about cloning Geronim
Great tool, I didn't know it, but it's right now on my bookmarks and laptop :)
2006/5/9, Javier Iglesias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It would be nice to have colored .eps.
There it goes. Anything else? ; )
> My Photoshop does not support .svg :)
Time to upgrade your toolbox:
-> http://www.inksca
Hi to all,
While playing with TC 5.5.17 and refactoring my apps to use it, I saw
a strange and show stopper behaviour.
I create a webapp, named myapp.war.
This application need some specific configuration to tailor it from
one customer to another.
I created a context file :
$CATALINA_HOME/con
Great !
2007/5/8, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Cool!
On May 8, 2007, at 11:05 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk3/
> ROADMAP?view=auto&rev=536215
> ==
>
+1
2007/5/11, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
Right now we are only shipping windows 32-bit binaries
inside .zip distro. Can we modify the build so the
zip contains windows 64-bit amd64/emt64 and ia64
binaries as well. It would increase the .zip
only by 200K. I'll also try to modify the se
2007/4/24, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2007/4/24, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The flag is about the response body. We send the response back via a
> webserver specific method. It's ws_write() ind mod_jk.c.
>
> ws_write() calls e.g. ap_rwrite() w
we're calling the existing one 6.0.x,
wouldn't it be reasonable to call the new one 6.1.x?
6.1 or 6.5 ? Like 5.0 and 5.5 :)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The iSeries (i5/OS) version need stuff added after 1.22 so it will be
available in 1.24...
2007/5/20, Guenter Knauf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi all,
> The Apache Tomcat team is pleased to announce the immediate availability
> of version 1.2.23 of the Apache Tomcat Connectors.
somehow I've a problem
2007/5/20, Guenter Knauf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Henri,
> The iSeries (i5/OS) version need stuff added after 1.22 so it will be
> available in 1.24...
dont get me wrong - I didnt want to kick here, it was only a question why we
had different handling for each platform
I know, it was more t
When I build jk on SLES Linux, I used to build it for the threaded
(mpm) and for the not-threaded (prefork) apache 2.x version.
BTW, configure fail since some release and can't works with apx2-mpm
(The SLES apxs2 for mpm mode). I located the problem in configure and
will report it later.
BTW, on
NUX=2 -D_REENTRANT -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE
-D_SVID_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -DAP_DEBUG -I /usr/lib/java/include -I
/usr/lib/java/include/ -c jk_connect.c -o jk_connect.lo
2007/5/31, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Henri Gomez wrote:
> BTW, configure fail since some release and ca
E=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE
-D_SVID_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -DAP_DEBUG -I /usr/lib/java/include -I
/usr/lib/java/include/ -c jk_connect.c -o jk_connect.lo
2007/5/31, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The SLES 9 problem with apxs-worker is fixed (bad configuration).
I just check the configure and build and -
works for me
2007/6/20, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
how is 5.5.24 looking, if no one objects, I'll plan to start a vote on
friday
Filip
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/tomcat-5.5/v5.5.24/
> will let these sit to mid next week, and then
When I see the buzz to make mod_jk works on i5/OS, any initiative to
make jk fully APR, is greatly welcome !
2007/6/29, jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Jun 27, 2007, at 11:27 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>
>> Rainer Jung wrote:
>>> Whenever I had a couple o
What about doing ?
unsigned char ch;
while (*p)
{
ch = (unsigned char)*p++;
header[i++] = toupper(ch);
}
2007/7/3, Ron Egyed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
FYI,
The following code in the sc_for_req_header function in module jk_ajp_common
was getting a pointer error on version V5R4 of i
Something we should also check is the CPU load of the Tomcat instance.
May be it will be usefull also to let users/admin add their own
counters in the load estimation.
For example, if some admins considers we should base the
load-balancing on HTTP requests or SQL access, and they have these
count
Well many beans are allready available :
java.lang.Theading
java.lang.MemoryPool
I could see also some beans related to CPU load but using a Sun JVM
(not on IBM).
2007/7/5, jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Henri Gomez wrote:
> Something we should also check is the CPU lo
2007/7/16, jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Joe Nathan wrote:
> I am talking about in-built capability that people do NOT need
> to install heaps of cranky-installation software packages!
Do you want a 100% Java PHP engine or just a simple native to Java bridge ?
Regards
-
PHP rewritten in Java could be a good idea for the core but what about
the various extensions ?
Of course it couldn't be a Tomcat project
2007/7/19, jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
I am thinking that this thread goes to nowhere...
To get some php stuff in TC you have 3 solutions:
Don't forget we're on Tomcat dev list
Tomcat is the RI for servlet/JSP engine, nothing less nothing more.
Adding PHP compatibility, via JNI wrapper, CGI or full Java PHP engine
is beyond the scope of the current Tomcat :-)
I think it will be great to see a basic PHP engine in pure Java, but
tha
Works for me :
- Linux PowerPC (Suse SLES9), Apache 2.0.59
- Linux x86 (Suse SLES10), Apache 2.2.3
- i5/OS V5R4M0, Apache 2.0.59
2007/7/26, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi all,
The next version of mod_jk is approaching its release. A code snapshot
(revision 59730) is available at:
http
+1
2007/7/27, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> we had exactly 10 downloads of our quality check tarball since the
> announcement yesterday. Three of the testers reported back positively
> (one of them via direct mail), no reports were negative. Since I
> received already a lot of positiv
2007/7/27, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello to all Tomcat project members,
>
> JK 1.2.24 has been available for testing for some days as a svn
> snapshot. Only very small bugs have been found and fixed. So I would
> like to proceed with the release vote.
>
> If you want to take a look, the
+0, could we see the pros and cons ?
2007/8/20, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm so tired of this thread, so let's settle it once and for all. I'm
> backing Remy's suggestion to send the current trunk to the sandbox:
> [ ] +1 Let's end the revolution
> [ ] +0 What revolution?
> [ ] -1 Viva
+1
Good idea to get the httpd release handling, a big +1.
I'll be more confortable with more eyes (commiters) on a new piece of code
2007/8/20, jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bill Barker wrote:
> > I'm so tired of this thread, so let's settle it once and for all. I'm
> > backing Rem
And what about using a modular design 'à la http modules' ?
2007/8/20, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [X] +0 What revolution?
>
> everything is backwards compatible, even Comet, if you take a 6.0.x
> comet app, it would work in trunk, there was just new features added
> I think thi
The define told us that we shouldn't use flush on AS400 V5R2 and previous.
On V5R4 (UTF8 mode), we could use it.
This code (no flush) is pretty old and was provided by i5/OS IBM Labs,
so better stick with it. On V5R3 and previous release, we didn't see
the send_bodyct was probably set another way
Ok, I send a question on the list.
2007/8/21, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Henri Gomez wrote:
> > The define told us that we shouldn't use flush on AS400 V5R2 and previous.
> >
> > On V5R4 (UTF8 mode), we could use it.
> >
> > This code (no flush)
Hi to all,
We want to clean up a little the mod_jk code defines specific to
i5/OS, and plan to make V5R4 OS as a minimum requirement.
Since all i5 systems are now in V5R4 I couldn't test or build for V5R3
and previous release.
Did there is i5/OS users with V5R3 and previous release ?
--
st V3 (use on your own
> risk) and only fully support V4.
A note shouldn't hurt. Did there is a date for 1.2.25 release ?
> Henri Gomez wrote:
> > Hi to all,
> >
> > We want to clean up a little the mod_jk code defines specific to
> > i5/OS, and plan to make V5
+1
We need a stable TC 6.x, experimental code should go to some sort of
incubation land
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
2007/9/3, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> We need to file the board report by next week for a board
> meeting on September 19th.
>
> Here is my draft, so please fill in the gaps, since it's my
> first one :)
>
> Thanks,
> Mladen
>
>
>
>
> Apache Tomcat Board Report, September 2007
>
Well what's the consensus on Java projects, like Xerces, Xalan or Lucene ?
2007/9/5, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >
> > On Sep 5, 2007, at 5:51 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> >
> >> Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> >>> yes, it is also easily abused by folks who throw a
2007/9/6, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Henri Gomez wrote:
> > Well what's the consensus on Java projects, like Xerces, Xalan or Lucene ?
> >
>
> It doesn't mater how other project do things. It's irrelevant.
Well all projects are ASF projects and i
Hi to all,
When should jk 1.2.26 should be released ?
Did there is still showstoppers ?
Regards
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2007/9/11, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Henri,
>
> 1.2.25 is still pretty young :)
Yes
> There are 2 new bugs for 1.2.25 that I'm aware of:
>
> - BZ 43287 (already fixed)
> - BZ 43229 (still needs to be fixed, should be fixed in next release)
>
> Version 1.2.25 is now 1 month old. So a r
Thanks a lot :)
2007/9/11, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Henri Gomez wrote:
> > 2007/9/11, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> Hi Henri,
> >>
> >> 1.2.25 is still pretty young :)
> >
> > Yes
> >
> >> There are 2
Hi to all,
A silly question, while using JConsole to check the min/max/spare
threads of AJP threads, I see that I couldn't see min/max/spare when
not set in server.xml.
Normal ?
Should I see the default values ?
Regards
-
To u
So what about RTC for core and CTR for extensions in incubator land ?
2007/9/21, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have a strong feeling this is turning again into a debate over words,
> arcane details
> and abstract concepts ( 'what is a trunk' and how to increase innovation )
>
> The rea
+1
RTC is a good idea for release and fixes.
Let's make use of RTC for release and CTR for more experimental code.
2007/9/21, jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> > It could be a simple as (as opposed to trying to reinvent the apache way)
> >
> > 1. Throu
+1
2007/9/23, Peter Rossbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>>[X] +1. Yes, the above works and addresses my concerns
> >>>as well as the problems which started this whole
> >>>thing.
> >>>[ ] 0. Whatever.
> >>>[ ] -1. The above does not work for the following reasons:
[ ] +1. Yes, the above works and addresses my concerns
as well as the problems which started this whole
thing.
Just to be sure
2007/9/26, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I'd like to call a vote on acceptance of the above methodology,
> > as crafted and fine-tune
1 - 100 of 647 matches
Mail list logo
