Well what's the consensus on Java projects, like Xerces, Xalan or Lucene ? 2007/9/5, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > > On Sep 5, 2007, at 5:51 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > > >> Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > >>> yes, it is also easily abused by folks who throw around vetoes as > >>> often as I change underwear. > >> > >> Ouch, that must smell. > >> > >>> I don't see a need to slow down development even further, at this > >>> point if the previous vote is considered valid, we don't even have a > >>> development branch, and a few months of work got thrown out the window > >> > >> Right, so I guess my own stuff in the sandbox was not even considered, > >> since the sandbox is sooo not nice enough for your great work :( The > >> right way to do things is to reach a rather precise agreement before > >> doing things, and the sandbox is the right place for that. > >> > > > > In httpd and apr-land, sandboxes are mostly single-developer places, where > > the rest of the team can see what's going on and review > > stuff. trunk is the place where more communal development is done > > and where that kind of agreement process is reached. > > Yes, it's exactly what I was saying. Trunk is currently based on Filip's > ideas, and as a result it should be moved to the sandbox (which is > somehow characterized as "trowing everything away"; since I was working > on my own stuff in the sandbox, I cannot help but conclude that my own > development was trash, and I was unfortunately right to move it away :( ). > > In a regular branch like trunk, I expect collaboration, discussion and > announcements of upcoming changes, etc, which did not happen. > > Rémy > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
