Sure, so in this case it's the JNI side, initialize(), which should be
more verbose ?
TCN_IMPLEMENT_CALL(jboolean, Library, initialize)(TCN_STDARGS)
{
UNREFERENCED_STDARGS;
if (!tcn_global_pool) {
if (apr_pool_create(&tcn_global_pool, NULL) != APR_SUCCESS) {
return JNI_FALSE;
}
apr_atomic_init(tcn_global_pool);
}
return JNI_TRUE;
}
But how ?
2006/3/8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
> RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
> <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38875>.
> ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
> INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
>
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38875
>
>
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-08 14:22 -------
> The code is simply logging the exception that is coming back, whatever it is,
> and I can't do more:
> log.debug(sm.getString("aprListener.aprInit",
> System.getProperty("java.library.path")), t);
>
>
> --
> Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
