The iSeries (i5/OS) version need stuff added after 1.22 so it will be available in 1.24...
2007/5/20, Guenter Knauf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi all, > The Apache Tomcat team is pleased to announce the immediate availability > of version 1.2.23 of the Apache Tomcat Connectors. somehow I've a problem with our distribution directories...... currently I see: http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/aix/ empty folder http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/freebsd/ empty folder http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/iseries/ empty folder http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/linux/ jk-1.2.21 http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/macosx/ empty folder http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/netware/ jk-1.2.23 http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/solaris/ jk-1.2.21 http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/win32/ jk-1.2.21 jk-1.2.22 jk-1.2.23 http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/win64/ jk-1.2.23 this makes me ask a couple of questions: 1) why do some folders list older versions while others do not? 2) why do we have a history of the last 3 versions with Win32 but no history for any other platform? 3) where do the older versions go? 4) why do we prefix the directories with 'jk-' although 'jk' is already in the path? For NetWare I would like to have at least the 1.2.15 release up again since that was last version where I supported Apache 1.3.x and Netscape - I point to this version in the README but obviously nobody can download anymore (except from my personal homedir). Sure its no problem for me just copy this over, but first I wanted to discuss that here, and ask if I probably missed that there's somewhere an archive from where older versions can be downloaded... Then I would like to have at least the last three versions always up, + the last version we have for any platforms where we cant build self, or where the maintainer is currently busy and some versions behind. This makes also sense in case it turns out later that we broke something with a release, and users may have to switch back. what do you think? greets, Guen. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
