_malloc_debug.so.0
/usr/i686-linux-gnu/lib/libnsl.so.1
/usr/i686-linux-gnu/lib/libgcc_s.so.1
root@messagerie-recup[10.10.10.22] ~ #
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/i686-linux-gnu/lib/ /usr/local/bin/ssacli
Smart Storage Administrator CLI 2.65.7.0
^C
root@messagerie-recup[10.10.10.22] ~ #
~ # ssacli
ssacli: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.6: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
root@messagerie-recup[10.10.10.22] ~ #
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/i686-linux-gnu/lib/ /usr/local/bin/ssacli
Smart Storage Administrator CLI 2.65.7.0
^C
Le 3/13/25 à 14:33, Erwan David a écrit :
You can get the layout with lsblk, IIRC
I'm not an expert on the subject,
but from the few man pages and online help I've gathered,
I have come to understand that the system (and lsblk) only see logical disks.
Physical disks are hidden behind the RAID
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 02:08:21PM CET, Yassine Chaouche
said:
> Le 3/12/25 à 23:11, Michael Stone a écrit :
> > Two of the drives are dead, you're not going to see anything from them
>
> So this means I can't rely on smartctl to list physical disks,
> which implies that,
> for servers I didn't
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 12:36:46 -0400
Michael Stone wrote:
> I guess I don't understand how you expect smartctl to query a dead
> disk. It's dead, that means it's not going to respond.
Not quite. The electronics may respond even if the head-disk assembly
(HDA) is broken. It probably won't give a co
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 11:35:08AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 12:36:46 -0400
Michael Stone wrote:
I guess I don't understand how you expect smartctl to query a dead
disk. It's dead, that means it's not going to respond.
Not quite. The electronics may respond even if the
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 02:08:21PM +0100, Yassine Chaouche wrote:
Le 3/12/25 à 23:11, Michael Stone a écrit :
Two of the drives are dead, you're not going to see anything from them
So this means I can't rely on smartctl to list physical disks,
I guess I don't understand how you expect smartc
Le 3/12/25 à 17:51, Greg a écrit> According to my (very old) scripts you should
use something like
/dev/cciss/c1d0 instead of /dev//sg?
It could be the old driver/kernel module interface.
The one I have is /dev/sgx.
I have no /dev/cciss* present.
Besides, for HP Smart Array,
the exam
Le 3/12/25 à 23:11, Michael Stone a écrit :
Two of the drives are dead, you're not going to see anything from them
So this means I can't rely on smartctl to list physical disks,
which implies that,
for servers I didn't install,
I need to know their RAID setup in advance,
or at least the total n
o see anything from them
and this is the output from cciss
root@messagerie-recup[10.10.10.22] ~ # cciss_vol_status -V /dev/sg0
Controller: Smart Array P420i
Board ID: 0x3354103c
Logical drives: 2
Running firmware: 3.22
ROM firmware: 3.22
/dev/sda: (Smart Array P420i) RAID 1(1+0) Vol
/dev/sdb /dev/
sg2 2.00TB
root@messagerie-recup[10.10.10.22] ~ #
and this is the output from cciss
root@messagerie-recup[10.10.10.22] ~ # cciss_vol_status -V /dev/sg0
Controller: Smart Array P420i
Board ID: 0x3354103c
Logical drives: 2
Running firmware: 3.22
-recup[10.10.10.22] ~ #
and this is the output from cciss
root@messagerie-recup[10.10.10.22] ~ # cciss_vol_status -V /dev/sg0
Controller: Smart Array P420i
Board ID: 0x3354103c
Logical drives: 2
Running firmware: 3.22
ROM firmware: 3.22
/dev/sda: (Smart Array P420i) RAID 1
On 11/18/24 12:45, Gupta, Tulika wrote:
Dear support team
I have purchased a new APC UPS which I want to connect with four Linux Debian
clusters.
The APC UPS Model: SURTD3000XLIM (APC model) has one serial com connector and
one USB connector on the back of the UPS. Two cables were provided al
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 11:45:33 +
"Gupta, Tulika" wrote:
> The APC UPS Model: SURTD3000XLIM (APC model) has one serial com
> connector and one USB connector on the back of the UPS. Two cables
> were provided alongwith the UPS purchase- a) RJ-45 to DB-9
> communication cable (goes to the serial c
Dear support team
I have purchased a new APC UPS which I want to connect with four Linux Debian
clusters.
The APC UPS Model: SURTD3000XLIM (APC model) has one serial com connector and
one USB connector on the back of the UPS. Two cables were provided alongwith
the UPS purchase- a) RJ-45 to DB-
On 09/10/24 at 21:10, Jochen Spieker wrote:
Andy Smith:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 08:41:38PM +0200, Franco Martelli wrote:
Do you know whether MD is clever enough to send an email to root when it
fails the device? Or have I to keep an eye on /proc/mdstat?
For more than a decade mdadm has s
Andy Smith:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 08:41:38PM +0200, Franco Martelli wrote:
>> Do you know whether MD is clever enough to send an email to root when it
>> fails the device? Or have I to keep an eye on /proc/mdstat?
>
> For more than a decade mdadm has shipped with a service that runs i
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 08:41:38PM +0200, Franco Martelli wrote:
> Do you know whether MD is clever enough to send an email to root when it
> fails the device? Or have I to keep an eye on /proc/mdstat?
For more than a decade mdadm has shipped with a service that runs in
monitor mode to do thi
On 08/10/24 at 20:40, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 04:58:46PM +0200, Jochen Spieker wrote:
Why is the RAID still considered healthy? At some point I
would expect the disk to be kicked from the RAID.
This will happen when/if MD can't compensate by reading data from other
m
is exactly that. It has been running mostly uninterrupted in my
basement. Max temp from the past 12 months (as far as I can tell by
looking at aggregated data in munin) is 36°C. That should be fairly
ideal.
> Also note that some disks actually lie in SMART data. I don't know if
>
e...@gmx.us:
> On 10/8/24 16:07, Jochen Spieker wrote:
>>| Oct 06 14:27:11 jigsaw kernel: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 9361257600 op
>>0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 150 prio class 3
>>| Oct 06 14:27:30 jigsaw kernel: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 9361275264 op
>>0x0:(READ) flags 0x4000 phys_seg 161 pr
ive is dying, slowly. In this case it's starting with a
> bad patch on a platter.
That would be my take too. The LBA sectors reported in a different
post in this thread being as close as they appear to be would also
corroborate the platter issue theory.
>> | SMART Attributes Data Str
On 10/8/24 16:07, Jochen Spieker wrote:
| Oct 06 14:27:11 jigsaw kernel: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 9361257600 op
0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 150 prio class 3
| Oct 06 14:27:30 jigsaw kernel: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 9361275264 op
0x0:(READ) flags 0x4000 phys_seg 161 prio class 3
| Oct 06 1
several times, so the drive's timeout is
> multiplied. Only if this ends up exceeding 30s will you get a read
> error, and the message from MD about rescheduling the sector.
That makes sense. And might also explain why the disk does not report
any reallocated sectors (yet).
> Ho
Dan Ritter:
> Jochen Spieker wrote:
>
>> The sector number mentioned at the bottom is increasing during the
>> check.
>
> So it repeats, and it's contiguous. That suggests a flaw in the
> drive itself.
It definitely looks like that:
| Oct 06 14:27:11 jigsaw kernel: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 9
icked from the RAID.
This will happen when/if MD can't compensate by reading data from other
mirrors and writing it back. If a write fails, or a disk drops
out entirely, then MD will fail the device.
Hopefully the results of your SMART long self-test will help clear this
up. These things can be
d me to believe that a cable / the SATA controller is at
> fault? I don't even see any errors with smartctl:
If the sectors were effectively random, a cable fault would be
likely. If the sectors are contiguous or nearly-so, that's
definitely the disk.
> | SMART Attributes Data Stru
pm
| Device is:In smartctl database 7.3/5319
| ATA Version is: ACS-2, ACS-3 T13/2161-D revision 3b
| SATA Version is: SATA 3.1, 6.0 Gb/s (current: 6.0 Gb/s)
| Local Time is:Tue Oct 8 15:15:22 2024 CEST
| SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
| SMART support is: Enabl
On Sunday 25 February 2024 06:33:26 pm gene heskett wrote:
> On 2/25/24 14:19, Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
> > On Sunday 25 February 2024 05:16:21 am gene heskett wrote:
> >> I have no idea how many EE's there are here in the states,
> >> 10,000+ probably. There are only around 130 CET's.
> >
> >
>> Well, I was merely hoping that someone might finally have come up
>> with a working solution ...
> Stop smoking, lose weight, have a healthy diet and exercise.
And most importantly: be lucky!
Stefan
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 2:47 PM hw wrote:
>
> Well, I was merely hoping that someone might finally have come up with
> a working solution ...
Stop smoking, lose weight, have a healthy diet and exercise.
Jeff
> On Mon, 2024-02-26 at 13:07 +, Andy Smith wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 26,
On Mon Feb 26th, 2024, at 15:49, Gene Heskett wrote:
> I have only one enabled radio, in a 3d printer, lists all the neighbors
> wifi routers it scans for and I assume the neighbors can hear it, but
> this things login id does not appear in its scan. Maybe its duff, IDK.
>
I seriously doubt
Well, I was merely hoping that someone might finally have come up with
a working solution ...
On Mon, 2024-02-26 at 13:07 +, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 12:24:34PM +0100, hw wrote:
> > How does the watch you got measure blood sugar? Doesn't that require
> > a blood s
On Mon, 2024-02-26 at 09:48 -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> On 2/26/24 06:25, hw wrote:
> > On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 10:03 -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > bluetooth, and It looks as if I have to buy a BT adaptor, so advise on
> > > that front would be most welcome also.
> > > [...]
> >
> >
On Mon, 2024-02-26 at 13:21 +0100, Hans wrote:
> [...]
> However, on my mobile a pairing password or number is not needed and for
> pairing the special app is also not needed on the mobile.
>
> This let me conclude, some other thing I must have missed.
>
> For testing purposes I used kde in-buil
Gene writes:
> I have only one enabled radio, in a 3d printer, lists all the
> neighbors wifi routers it scans for and I assume the neighbors can
> hear it, but this things login id does not appear in its scan. Maybe
> its duff, IDK.
Bluetooth is not WiFi. Different protocols.
https://en.wikiped
On 2/26/24 07:21, Hans wrote:
Am Montag, 26. Februar 2024, 12:24:34 CET schrieb hw:
If you're locking for a bluetooth USB adapter: I have a 'Bluetooth
5.0' adapter from TP-Link which works with Fedora. I've been able to
use it with a headset and an xbox controller. A smartphone and an IP
phone
On 2/26/24 06:25, hw wrote:
On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 10:03 -0500, gene heskett wrote:
[...]
bluetooth, and It looks as if I have to buy a BT adaptor, so advise on
that front would be most welcome also.
[...]
If you're locking for a bluetooth USB adapter: I have a 'Bluetooth
5.0' adapter from TP-L
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 12:24:34PM +0100, hw wrote:
> How does the watch you got measure blood sugar? Doesn't that require
> a blood sample?
Some of them claim to extrapolate it from sweat, others claim to be
able to estimate it from shining near-infrared at the blood vessels
that are near t
Am Montag, 26. Februar 2024, 12:24:34 CET schrieb hw:
> If you're locking for a bluetooth USB adapter: I have a 'Bluetooth
> 5.0' adapter from TP-Link which works with Fedora. I've been able to
> use it with a headset and an xbox controller. A smartphone and an IP
> phone also show up as devices,
On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 10:03 -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> [...]
> bluetooth, and It looks as if I have to buy a BT adaptor, so advise on
> that front would be most welcome also.
> [...]
If you're locking for a bluetooth USB adapter: I have a 'Bluetooth
5.0' adapter from TP-Link which works with Fe
On Sun 25 Feb 2024 at 18:33:26 (-0500), gene heskett wrote:
> On 2/25/24 14:19, Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
> > On Sunday 25 February 2024 05:16:21 am gene heskett wrote:
> > > I have no idea how many EE's there are here in the states,
> > > 10,000+ probably. There are only around 130 CET's.
> >
>
On 2/25/24 14:19, Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
On Sunday 25 February 2024 05:16:21 am gene heskett wrote:
I have no idea how many EE's there are here in the states,
10,000+ probably. There are only around 130 CET's.
More than that. My certificate number is PA-230...
Mine is NB-116, so they m
On 2/25/24 07:14, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
I have to agree, and pursuing that seems to disclose I do not have the
non-frre in my configs. So I'm now asking for help to add it to my
/etc/apt/sources *.list stuff.
For apt sources.list - have a look at:
https://wiki.debian.org/SourcesList
Th
On Sunday 25 February 2024 05:16:21 am gene heskett wrote:
> I have no idea how many EE's there are here in the states,
> 10,000+ probably. There are only around 130 CET's.
More than that. My certificate number is PA-230...
--
Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and
On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 05:16:21AM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> On 2/25/24 03:36, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 02:05:50PM -0500, Lee wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 12:06 PM gene heskett wrote:
> > > > On 2/24/24 11:03, Loïc Grenié wrote:
> > > > > On Sat Feb 24th, 2024, a
a DM-II, but the recent shortage of
trulicity, a
weekly self administerd shot that helps regulate one's blood guclose
levels has got us scrambling for alternatives. So a month back I
bought
one of the so called smart watches that purports to monitor blood sugar.
> > As most of you know I'm a DM-II, but the recent shortage of
> > > trulicity, a
> > > weekly self administerd shot that helps regulate one's blood guclose
> > > levels has got us scrambling for alternatives. So a month back I
> > >
On 2/24/24 12:36, gene heskett wrote:
On 2/24/24 12:23, John Hasler wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noninvasive_glucose_monitor
The consensus seems to be that hey are not yet ready for daily driver use.
But I'm that curios cat.
Cheers, Gene Heskett, CET.
So I just installed the only dri
t; > trulicity, a
> > weekly self administerd shot that helps regulate one's blood
> > guclose levels has got us scrambling for alternatives. So a month
> > back I bought
> > one of the so called smart watches that purports to monitor
> >
I bought one of the
> so called smart watches that purports to monitor blood sugar.
I'm having some difficulty translating your words and acronyms but I
think I got the gist that you're type II diabetic and have bought a
watch for glucose monitoring?
I'm also a type II
> > trulicity, a
> > weekly self administerd shot that helps regulate one's blood guclose
> > levels has got us scrambling for alternatives. So a month back I
> > bought
> > one of the so called smart watches that purports to monitor blood sugar.
&
On 2/24/24 12:23, John Hasler wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noninvasive_glucose_monitor
The consensus seems to be that hey are not yet ready for daily driver use.
But I'm that curios cat.
Cheers, Gene Heskett, CET.
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noninvasive_glucose_monitor
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On 2/24/24 11:15, Stefan Monnier wrote:
So the question I'm getting to is: Do we have a utility that can be paired
with whatever wifi/bluetooth this thing uses and would allow it to work?
With a bit of luck it can be "paired" with your "2TB" SSDs?
Stefan "sorry, couldn't resist"
.
has got us scrambling for alternatives. So a month back I
bought
one of the so called smart watches that purports to monitor blood sugar.
"purports" appears to be the correct verb
https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/safety-communications/do-not-use-smartwatches-or-smart-rings-measure-bloo
> So the question I'm getting to is: Do we have a utility that can be paired
> with whatever wifi/bluetooth this thing uses and would allow it to work?
With a bit of luck it can be "paired" with your "2TB" SSDs?
Stefan "sorry, couldn't resist"
So a month back I bought
> one of the so called smart watches that purports to monitor blood sugar.
>
"purports" appears to be the correct verb
https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/safety-communications/do-not-use-smartwatches-or-smart-rings-measure-blood-glucose-levels-fda-safety-commu
Greetings all;
As most of you know I'm a DM-II, but the recent shortage of trulicity, a
weekly self administerd shot that helps regulate one's blood guclose
levels has got us scrambling for alternatives. So a month back I bought
one of the so called smart watches that purports
On 2/17/24 13:45, Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
On Friday 16 February 2024 04:42:12 pm Gremlin wrote:
On 2/16/24 13:56, Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
On Friday 16 February 2024 04:52:22 am David Christensen wrote:
I think the Raspberry Pi, etc., users on this list live with USB storage
and have fo
On Friday 16 February 2024 04:42:12 pm Gremlin wrote:
> On 2/16/24 13:56, Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
> > On Friday 16 February 2024 04:52:22 am David Christensen wrote:
> >> I think the Raspberry Pi, etc., users on this list live with USB storage
> >> and have found it to be reliable enough for pe
On 2/16/24 13:56, Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
On Friday 16 February 2024 04:52:22 am David Christensen wrote:
I think the Raspberry Pi, etc., users on this list live with USB storage
and have found it to be reliable enough for personal and SOHO network use.
I have one, haven't done much with
On 2/16/24 10:56, Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
On Friday 16 February 2024 04:52:22 am David Christensen wrote:
I think the Raspberry Pi, etc., users on this list live with USB storage
and have found it to be reliable enough for personal and SOHO network use.
I have one, haven't done much with
On Friday 16 February 2024 04:52:22 am David Christensen wrote:
> I think the Raspberry Pi, etc., users on this list live with USB storage
> and have found it to be reliable enough for personal and SOHO network use.
I have one, haven't done much with it. Are there any alternative ways to
inte
on for that was because the 8-drive array left me with no open
SATA ports to be able to connect spare drives in order to do drive
replacements without needing to rebuild the whole shaboozle.
Having spare drive bays for RAID drive replacement is smart.
If you have a processor, memory, PCIe slot, a
On 15 Feb 2024 10:41 -0500, from wande...@fastmail.fm (The Wanderer):
>> 65,000 hard links seems to be an ext4 limit:
>>
>> https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-kernel-70/max-hard-link-per-file-on-ext4-4175454538/#post4914624
>
> That sounds right.
>
>> I believe ZFS can do more hard l
On 2024-02-15 at 01:18, songbird wrote:
> The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> TL;DR: It worked! I'm back up and running, with what appears to be
>> all my data safely recovered from the failing storage stack!
>
> i'm glad you got it back up and running and i hope all your data is
> intact. :)
Thank you.
On 2024-01-11 at 15:25, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> manufacturers in different memory banks, but since it's always
>> possible to power down, replace or just remove memory, and power up
>> again,
>
> Hmm... "always"? What about long running computations like that
> simulation (or LLM training) la
On 2024-02-15 at 03:09, David Christensen wrote:
> On 2/14/24 18:54, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> TL;DR: It worked! I'm back up and running, with what appears to be
>> all my data safely recovered from the failing storage stack!
>
> That is good to hear. :-)
>
>> On 2024-01-09 at 14:22, The Wander
On 2024-02-15 at 07:14, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> It turns out that there is a hard limit of 65000 hardlinks per
>> on-disk file;
>
> That's a filesystem dependent value. That's the value for ext4.
I think I recall reading that while I was flailing over this,
The Wanderer wrote:
> It turns out that there is a hard limit of 65000
> hardlinks per on-disk file;
That's a filesystem dependent value. That's the value for ext4.
XFS has a much larger limit I believe. As well as some other helpful
properties for large filesystems.
btrfs has different limits
On 2/14/24 18:54, The Wanderer wrote:
TL;DR: It worked! I'm back up and running, with what appears to be all
my data safely recovered from the failing storage stack!
That is good to hear. :-)
On 2024-01-09 at 14:22, The Wanderer wrote:
On 2024-01-09 at 14:01, Michael Kjörling wrote:
On
The Wanderer wrote:
> TL;DR: It worked! I'm back up and running, with what appears to be all
> my data safely recovered from the failing storage stack!
...
i'm glad you got it back up and running and i hope all your
data is intact. :)
which SSDs did you use?
songbird
TL;DR: It worked! I'm back up and running, with what appears to be all
my data safely recovered from the failing storage stack!
On 2024-01-09 at 14:22, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2024-01-09 at 14:01, Michael Kjörling wrote:
>
>> On 9 Jan 2024 13:25 -0500, from wande...@fastmail.fm (The
>> Wandere
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > manufacturers in different memory banks, but since it's always
> > possible to power down, replace or just remove memory, and power
> > up again,
>
> Hmm... "always"? What about long running computations like that
> simulation (or LLM training) launched a month ago and
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 03:25:51PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
manufacturers in different memory banks, but since it's always
possible to power down, replace or just remove memory, and power
up again,
Hmm... "always"? What about long running computations like that
simulation (or LLM training)
> manufacturers in different memory banks, but since it's always
> possible to power down, replace or just remove memory, and power
> up again,
Hmm... "always"? What about long running computations like that
simulation (or LLM training) launched a month ago and that's expected to
finish in anothe
David Christensen wrote:
> On 1/11/24 05:50, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > David Christensen wrote:
> STFW the Dell PowerEdge 6850 (circa 2004) featured "hot plug" disk drives,
> expansion slots, memory risers, power supplies, and system cooling fans:
>
> https://downloads.dell.com/manuals/all-products/e
On 1/11/24 05:50, Dan Ritter wrote:
David Christensen wrote:
dual network interfaces, and dual power supplies come to mind. I am
unclear about dual processors and/or dual memory banks.
There are no systems that I'm aware of which allow you to use 2
or more processors of different models; the
David Christensen wrote:
> On 1/10/24 09:07, Curt wrote:
> > On 2024-01-10, David Christensen wrote:
>
> dual network interfaces, and dual power supplies come to mind. I am unclear
> about dual processors and/or dual memory banks. Moving beyond one computer,
There are no systems that I'm awar
On 1/10/24 09:30, Michael Kjörling wrote:
My understanding is that it's even relatively common, at least
for flight-critical components, to use totally different
implementations (of both hardware and software), not just sourced from
different vendors, resellers or batches, such that the same sof
l
suddenly showing lots of SMART warnings -- I would not have confidence
in that RAID.
It's curious, but I just heard something on French TV from a journalist
that's relevant to this. She said she'd covered the aeronautics field in
the past and mentioned the *principe de dissemblance*
ame RAID-6, all run 2.5 years 24x7, and all
> > suddenly showing lots of SMART warnings -- I would not have confidence
> > in that RAID.
>
> It's curious, but I just heard something on French TV from a journalist
> that's relevant to this. She said she'd covered
On 10 Jan 2024 17:07 -, from cu...@free.fr (Curt):
> It's curious, but I just heard something on French TV from a journalist
> that's relevant to this. She said she'd covered the aeronautics field in
> the past and mentioned the *principe de dissemblance* (dissimilarity
> principle). Critical r
On 2024-01-10, David Christensen wrote:
>
>
> Given the OP's situation -- 8 consumer SSD's, same make and model,
> possibly from a defective manufacturing batch, all purchased at the same
> time, all deployed in the same RAID-6, all run 2.5 years 24x7, and all
> su
turing batch, all purchased at the same
time, all deployed in the same RAID-6, all run 2.5 years 24x7, and all
suddenly showing lots of SMART warnings -- I would not have confidence
in that RAID.
David
On 9 Jan 2024 14:34 -0800, from dpchr...@holgerdanske.com (David Christensen):
>> I don't know how to interpret the "Pre-fail" notation for the other
>> attributes.
>
> AIUI "Pre-fail" indicates the drive is going to fail soon and should be
> replaced.
Only if the attribute hits the "failure" thr
On 1/9/24 14:34, David Christensen wrote:
You can always run smartctl manual ...
Correction: manually
To get protection against two-device failure, you need 3-day mirrors ...
Correction: 3-way
Perhaps other readers with madm, ...
Correction: mdadm
David
runs periodically via systemd, Perhaps another reader can
post the incantation required to display the settings and/or locate past
SMART reports on disk.
You can always run smartctl manual to get a SMART report whenever you
want (I like the --xall/-x option):
# smartctl -x DEV
I've looked at
ne up to values in the multiple
>>>> hundreds per drive. Since then (yesterday), I've also gotten
>>>> further notification mails about at least one of the drives
>>>> increasing further. So far today I have not gotten any such
>>>> notification
n further
>>> notification mails about at least one of the drives increasing
>>> further. So far today I have not gotten any such notifications.
>
> Do you read the provided excerpt from the SMART data as indicating that
> there are hundreds of bad blocks, or that they are
On 9 Jan 2024 10:21 -0500, from wande...@fastmail.fm (The Wanderer):
>>> Model Family: Samsung based SSDs
>>> Device Model: Samsung SSD 870 EVO 2TB
>>
>> These may or may not be under warranty,
>
> I would be surprised if there were warranty coverage at
> this point, but might look a bit
, healthy, happy life
> with one bad sector and never gave any signs of further problems.
>
> Hundreds of bad blocks per drive is certainly cause for concern.
>
> More worrying is a _significant increase in the rate of increase_ of
> the bad blocks count. That suggests that the dr
On 2024-01-09 at 11:12, Curt wrote:
> On 2024-01-09, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> My default plan is to identify an appropriate model and buy a pair
>> of replacement drives, but not install them yet; buy another two
>> drives every six months, until I have a full replacement set; and
>> start faili
e that you have sufficient redundancy to
manage within the storage array.
The good part is if you look at SMART attributes 5 and 179; taken in
combination, I take them as indication that all (31) reallocated
sectors have been reallocated into the spare sectors pool, and this
represents approximately 2
On 2024-01-09, The Wanderer wrote:
>
> My default plan is to identify an appropriate model and buy a pair of
> replacement drives, but not install them yet; buy another two drives
> every six months, until I have a full replacement set; and start failing
> drives out of the RAID array and installi
On 2024-01-09 at 09:38, Dan Ritter wrote:
> The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> So... as the Subject asks, should I be worried? How do I interpret
>> these results, and at what point do they start to reflect something
>> to take action over? If there is not reason to be worried, what
>> *do* these alerts in
The Wanderer wrote:
> So... as the Subject asks, should I be worried? How do I interpret these
> results, and at what point do they start to reflect something to take
> action over? If there is not reason to be worried, what *do* these
> alerts indicate, and at what point *should* I start to be wo
om all eight drives would
seem more likely to reflect a real problem.
I've looked at the SMART attributes for the drives, and am having a hard
time determining whether or not there's anything worth being actually
concerned about here. Some of the information I'm seeing see
Thx
William and Dan
On 18.10.23 16:52, William Porter wrote:
Should be in the "Enabling the Controller" section here:
https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c04441385 ,
pages 6 and 7
I think you're looking for AHCI mode, not HBA/IT mode as this seems to
be a SATA devic
1 - 100 of 652 matches
Mail list logo
