e...@gmx.us: > On 10/8/24 16:07, Jochen Spieker wrote: >>| Oct 06 14:27:11 jigsaw kernel: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 9361257600 op >>0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 150 prio class 3 >>| Oct 06 14:27:30 jigsaw kernel: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 9361275264 op >>0x0:(READ) flags 0x4000 phys_seg 161 prio class 3 >>| Oct 06 14:27:37 jigsaw kernel: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 9361277696 op >>0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 71 prio class 3 >>| Oct 06 14:28:02 jigsaw kernel: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 9361283584 op >>0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 160 prio class 3 >>| Oct 06 14:28:09 jigsaw kernel: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 9361284864 op etc. > > Those aren't sequential, or even exhibiting the same interval from one to > the next. Am I misinterpreting the data?
No, but the numbers are close to each other and the errors did not
happen sporadically throughout the runtime of the md check, but only
within a specific timeframe.
> Ten of the errors are 1280
> sectors after the previous error and five more pairs are 1536 sectors apart;
> maybe that's significant?
That may have something to do with the physical layout on the platters.
If there is a "bad patch" on one of them, I would expect something like
this. Maybe one rotation is 1280 sectors apart at some point, and 1536 a
little bit further from the center.
J.
--
I think the environment will be okay.
[Agree] [Disagree]
<http://archive.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
