On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:39:12AM -0500, jesse mckeown wrote:
>
> Now, I don't know if the debian 8 release notes vs. the AMD
> documentation are even addressing the same thing or
> orthogonal things, but I can't find mention of the status of this
> issue in recenter debian mailing lists;
>
>
The release notes for debian 8, released in April of 2015, say
https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#gnome-3d
> ## 5.11. The GNOME desktop does not work with the AMD proprietary FGLRX driver
>
> Unlike other OpenGL drivers, the AMD FGLRX d
I'm using debian testing/sid amd64+i386, fglrx-driver 15.7-3,
wine-development 1.7.51-1. Applications were run from 32-bit wine
prefix.
Hello. I tried installing fglrx driver for my Radeon HD 6850. It installed
and X.org ran properly. But when I try to run any windows application with
wine, it falls immediately givimg me the message:
[xcb] Extra reply data still left in queue
[xcb] This is most likely caused by a broken X
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> Maybe you'll find an answer here:
> http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/Category:T400
No dice. I'm not totally sold on using fglrx-legacy on this if one of the
radeon drivers will do 3d acceleration.
Maybe you'll find an answer here: http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/Category:T400
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 06:02:26AM -0500, Paul Johnson wrote:
> OK, I'm stumped. I've tried a couple ways now and I'm going around in
> circles and tearing my fur out over this... what's the best approach to
> getting 3D acceleration going on a ThinkPad T400?
Can you let us know what you have tri
OK, I'm stumped. I've tried a couple ways now and I'm going around in
circles and tearing my fur out over this... what's the best approach to
getting 3D acceleration going on a ThinkPad T400?
op 16-07-14 18:11, Dylan Bass schreef:
> I noticed fglrx-driver has been removed only from the jessie repos. Any
> reason why?
It does not work with the latest Xorg:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754249
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753781#88
With r
On 16/07/14 12:11 PM, Dylan Bass wrote:
I noticed fglrx-driver has been removed only from the jessie repos.
Any reason why?
The fglrx driver is closed source. AMD have to provide one for for each
version of X. If they haven't updated their driver, the Debian
maintainers can't
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 10:11:12 -0600
Dylan Bass wrote:
> I noticed fglrx-driver has been removed only from the jessie
> repos. Any reason why?
This is the way testing's working, re-read Debian docs.
--
the Lord doesn't touch many people nowadays…
priests take care
I noticed fglrx-driver has been removed only from the jessie repos. Any
reason why?
I updated some packages on my debian wheezy 7 (64 bit) using the command
apt-get -u upgrade and after a reboot, I was on a blank screen. So I booted
into recovery and ran startx, which was again a blank screen.
So I uninstalled the fglrx drivers and I was able to boot back on gnome.
But now the
ation of a new video card. I suspect the
installation of the Radeon Catalyst control panel, which allows you to
control the video card settings, is the exact point it happened. Can
anybody verify if fglrx-control disables system settings? I believe that is
the only package I chose manually, the rest
On 2013-10-05 18:49 +0200, Enrico Polesel wrote:
> I've just install debian jessie on a notebook and I'm not able to
> install fglrx-driver (there are only the legacy version)
>
> According to packages.debian.org[1] that packages is not longer
> available on jessie and I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all
I've just install debian jessie on a notebook and I'm not able to
install fglrx-driver (there are only the legacy version)
According to packages.debian.org[1] that packages is not longer
available on jessie and I don't want
he correct drivers.
Like too often, the problem comes from proprietary drivers. I have to use fglrx,
because i often do 3d work. The problem is, the fglrx module for dkms doesn't
compile with 3.10.x, and therefore i can't have DRI (which depends on this
module) which i need for my 3d work.
the 3.2.0-3 kernel installed and when I use the driver
>> their everything works, nothing else is changed. So think that the
>> fglrx driver and Xserver I have installed now work together.
>>
> I have a HD7700 (cape verde XT) running jessie with xserver-xorg version:
> 1:7.7+
On 24-06-2013 10:48, Max Linke wrote:
I still have the 3.2.0-3 kernel installed and when I use the driver
their everything works, nothing else is changed. So think that the
fglrx driver and Xserver I have installed now work together.
I have a HD7700 (cape verde XT) running jessie with xserver
I still have the 3.2.0-3 kernel installed and when I use the driver
their everything works, nothing else is changed. So think that the
fglrx driver and Xserver I have installed now work together.
On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 20:28:35 +0200
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Catalyst versions only run with s
Catalyst versions only run with some versions of X and some cards are
only provided by some versions of Catalyst.
Current "Catalyst doesn't support xorg-server 1.14.
Catalyst < 12.10 and Catalyst Legacy do not support xorg-server 1.13.
Catalyst < 12.6 doesn't support xorg-server 1.12." -
https://w
Hi
The 7770 is currently not supported by the open radon driver in testing
so I tried to go with fglrx.
I follow the instructions in the debian wiki
http://wiki.debian.org/ATIProprietary
and created a xorg.conf with 'aticonfig --initial'. When ever I try to
start X now with fglrx turne
gt; audio was not working, and figured it was a limitation in the fglrx driver
> and it seemed otherwise to run well. Starting yesterday, however, I have
> frequent but not consistent kernel panics during the boot process that seem
> to involve support for that feature. Sometimes it boots wit
On Tuesday 19,February,2013 05:53 PM, lina wrote:
>
> # aptitude reinstall glx-diversions
>
> shows:
>
> No diversion 'diversion of
> /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so to
> /usr/lib/mesa-diverted/libglx.so.dbg by glx-diversions', none removed.
> No diversion 'diversion of
# aptitude reinstall glx-diversions
shows:
No diversion 'diversion of
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so to
/usr/lib/mesa-diverted/libglx.so.dbg by glx-diversions', none removed.
No diversion 'diversion of /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so to
/usr/lib/mesa-diverted
Hi,
under wheezy,
I tried (already 8 or 9 times) to install the fglrx driver.
Yesterday I build the new kernel 3.7.9, also update the xserver-* related.
Now chocked with the following error:
No diversion 'diversion of /usr/lib32/libGL.so.1.2 by fglrx-glx-ia32',
none removed.
#
On 14/01/13 13:00, Johannes Rohr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I thought I might share my experience regarding the FGLRX drivers, as
> they are still widely used, possibly also by many on this list.
>
> [...]
>
> So, my advise to any Debian user would be: If you want a happy
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 12:27:25PM CET, Ralf Mardorf
said:
> I can confirm that on Linux 3D support by modern versions of X FLOSS
> drivers is very good, especially for ATI cards the proprietary driver
> isn't maintained for not really old cards on Linux.
>
> Even nouveau for NVIDI graphics toda
Hi,
I thought I might share my experience regarding the FGLRX drivers, as
they are still widely used, possibly also by many on this list.
I own a Thinkpad W500 with an ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 graphics card.
When I installed Debian Squeeze on it, I didn't seriously conside
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
> The open source drivers work better (in terms of integration with the X
> server) because the maintainers can adjust them to the latest changes in X
> and other graphic software. Unfortunately due to the problems noted above,
> they can't keep u
board and
sometimes i like to play old good windows games with help of "wine"
while my little daughter is sleeping. But recently a real disaster
had happened, ATI dropped a support of Radeon 4xxx cards and after
update i was oblige to install a radeon driver instead of fglrx.
Unfortun
windows games with help of "wine"
while my little daughter is sleeping. But recently a real disaster
had happened, ATI dropped a support of Radeon 4xxx cards and after
update i was oblige to install a radeon driver instead of fglrx.
Unfortunately this driver doesn't allow me to play He
windows games with help of "wine"
while my little daughter is sleeping. But recently a real disaster
had happened, ATI dropped a support of Radeon 4xxx cards and after
update i was oblige to install a radeon driver instead of fglrx.
Unfortunately this driver doesn't allow me to play
ws games with help of "wine"
>> while my little daughter is sleeping. But recently a real disaster
>> had happened, ATI dropped a support of Radeon 4xxx cards and after
>> update i was oblige to install a radeon driver instead of fglrx.
>> Unfortunately this driver doe
ping. But recently a real disaster
> had happened, ATI dropped a support of Radeon 4xxx cards and after
> update i was oblige to install a radeon driver instead of fglrx.
> Unfortunately this driver doesn't allow me to play Heroes of MM V. I
> tried to return to previous version of fgl
cards and after update i was oblige to
install a radeon driver instead of fglrx. Unfortunately this driver
doesn't allow me to play Heroes of MM V. I tried to return to previous
version of fglrx-driver(from snapshots.debian.org repo), but didn't
succeed in it because driver depe
Hi,
I can't get to install the proprietary driver "fglrx" with ATI Radeon HD
5970 on Debian Squeeze.
After the installation with ATI Catalyst 12-8 and a reboot, from the stage
of GDM, the screen is freezing with a lot of little squares appearing on X,
mouse is locking and total
> Hi, folks!
>
> I'm Cesar, from Brazil. I've been using Debian Squeeze on my desktop:
> it has a ATI Technologies Inc M880G [Mobility Radeon HD 4200] so that
> fglrx-driver works perfectly. But, I'm gonna buy a brand new laptop HP
> Elitebook 8460w very soon
Hi, folks!
I'm Cesar, from Brazil. I've been using Debian Squeeze on my desktop:
it has a ATI Technologies Inc M880G [Mobility Radeon HD 4200] so that
fglrx-driver works perfectly. But, I'm gonna buy a brand new laptop HP
Elitebook 8460w very soon so that machine has a AMD FirePr
Hi, folks!
I'm Cesar, from Brazil. I've been using Debian Squeeze on my desktop:
it has a ATI Technologies Inc M880G [Mobility Radeon HD 4200] so that
fglrx-driver works perfectly. But, I'm gonna buy a brand new laptop HP
Elitebook 8460w very soon so that machine has a AMD FirePr
Hi Paul,
I faced the same problem of blinking cursor when using the below 3
different drivers :
fglrx-driver 1:12-6~beta-1
amd-driver-installer-12-4-x86.x86_64.run
amd-driver-installer-12-3-x86.x86_64.run
I then followed Issam's recommendation as below to workaround the issue and g
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 17:08:02 -0400, Allington wrote in message
:
> Hello,
>
> I am looking for specific catalyst driver versions for my ATI graphics
> card. Each driver has it's varying performance affect on linux with
> some newer versions actually degrading performance for my 5970. I
> would l
versions actually degrading performance for my 5970. I would like
> to have some options if the one I choose isn't functioning well for my
> tasks.
(...)
> Am I correct in assuming the debian fglrx-driver 1:12-3-1 is the
> equivalent of the AMD Catalyst 12.3 fglrx 8.95
> and th
ell for my tasks.
Here are some examples from the AMD site.
For the 11.6 Catalyst: fglrx 8.861-110524a-119606C-ATI
For the 12.3 Catalyst: fglrx 8.95-120214a-133662E-ATI
http://developer.amd.com/download/ccc/p ...
fault.aspx<http://developer.amd.com/download/ccc/pages/default.aspx>
Looking th
I'm using Debian Squeeze (new to linux) with the ATI fglrx-driver installed
along with pm-utils.
Sometimes, when my computer comes back up from suspend mode, it just hangs at
gdm login screen. When I kill the xsession (ctrl + alt + f1), it goes into
console mode. After login to console
[dropping CC to the bug, at least for now]
On Du, 04 dec 11, 23:24:48, lina wrote:
> Sincerely looking for advice about following error:
Hi Lina,
We are glad to help, but it is not easy to do so via e-mail. It is very
important that:
- you are patient :)
- you describe your problem as accuratel
On 2011-12-04, lina wrote:
> Sincerely looking for advice about following error:
>
> more Xorg.0.log | grep WW
>
UUOM
;-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debi
ill exist.
>
>>
>> [ 16136.195] (WW) Falling back to old probe method for fglrx
>> [ 16136.200] (WW) Unsupported ASIC ID 1002:675F:: in control file
>> [ 16136.200] (WW) Unsupported ASIC ID 1002:675F:: in control file
>> [ 16136.200] (WW) fglrx: No ma
not
> exist.
>
This one can be safely ignored, unless you are looking for a Russian font
set.
> [ 16136.195] (WW) Falling back to old probe method for fglrx
> [ 16136.200] (WW) Unsupported ASIC ID 1002:675F:: in control file
> [ 16136.200] (WW) Unsupported ASI
Sincerely looking for advice about following error:
more Xorg.0.log | grep WW
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
[ 16136.164] (WW) The directory "/usr/share/fonts/X11/cyrillic" does not exist.
[ 16136.195] (WW) Falling back to old probe method
to build the module during
> > boot up.
> > if the latter, how ?
>
> I don't care about the ATI package, only the Debian one.
>
> > there doesn't appear to be a dkms build log in /var/log.
> > There was no output from synaptic when installing the fglrx dkms
e about the ATI package, only the Debian one.
> there doesn't appear to be a dkms build log in /var/log.
> There was no output from synaptic when installing the fglrx dkms package.
From what I recall during installation there is a "show terminal output"
or similar. Anyway, for o
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:36:45 + (UTC)
Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:42:12 +, Richard wrote:
>
> > The fglrx module is not getting built, by dkms or by me going to
> > /usr/src/fglrx-11-11 and running make. The results of that action are:-
> > make -C /l
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:42:53 +0200
Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Lu, 21 nov 11, 16:42:12, Richard wrote:
> > Hi,
> > The fglrx module is not getting built, by dkms or by me going to
> > /usr/src/fglrx-11-11 and running make.
> > The results of that action are:-
>
On Lu, 21 nov 11, 16:42:12, Richard wrote:
> Hi,
> The fglrx module is not getting built, by dkms or by me going to
> /usr/src/fglrx-11-11 and running make.
> The results of that action are:-
> make -C /lib/modules/3.0.0-1-amd64/build SUBDIRS=/usr/src/fglrx-11-11 modules
> make
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:42:12 +, Richard wrote:
> The fglrx module is not getting built, by dkms or by me going to
> /usr/src/fglrx-11-11 and running make. The results of that action are:-
> make -C /lib/modules/3.0.0-1-amd64/build SUBDIRS=/usr/src/fglrx-11-11
> modules make: ***
Hi,
The fglrx module is not getting built, by dkms or by me going to
/usr/src/fglrx-11-11 and running make.
The results of that action are:-
make -C /lib/modules/3.0.0-1-amd64/build SUBDIRS=/usr/src/fglrx-11-11 modules
make: *** /lib/modules/3.0.0-1-amd64/build: No such file or directory. Stop
Hi,
> When I update this morning (wheezy one but with sid fglrx-driver), the
> xserver-xorg-core was updated.
>
> my fglrx-driver was removed,
>
> when I tried to install, it's reported:
>
> fglrx-driver depends on xorg-video-abi-10 or -8 or -6. which are not
&g
30/09/2011 05:33, lina wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I update this morning (wheezy one but with sid fglrx-driver), the
> xserver-xorg-core was updated.
>
> my fglrx-driver was removed,
>
> when I tried to install, it's reported:
>
> fglrx-driver depends on xorg-vide
Hi,
When I update this morning (wheezy one but with sid fglrx-driver), the
xserver-xorg-core was updated.
my fglrx-driver was removed,
when I tried to install, it's reported:
fglrx-driver depends on xorg-video-abi-10 or -8 or -6. which are not
avaiable.
then I checked package
xserver
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 00:31:07 +0300, Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
> Tvtime uses x.org xv extension. In the past support for that extension
> was not good at least for AMD64 port. So I just wonder does it work
> nowadays with fgrlx driver in squeeze ?
I don't use tvtime, but I do use Xv with Radeon on
On 09/10/2011 08:20 PM, � wrote:
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 16:28:45 +0300, Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
Does tvtime work with fglrx drivers on Debian Squeeze ?
I don't see why not :-?
Tvtime uses x.org xv extension. In the past support for that extension
was not good at least for AMD64 port
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:30:30 +0800, lina wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2011, at 1:20, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> When it comes to the closed source driver I like nvidia cards more than
>> ATI but that's just a personal POV
>
> What does the POV mean?
It's a jargon acronym for "Point Of View".
Greet.. ee
On Sep 11, 2011, at 1:20, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 16:28:45 +0300, Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
>
>> Does tvtime work with fglrx drivers on Debian Squeeze ?
>
> I don't see why not :-?
>
> That is, it can have problems but no more than other propri
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 16:28:45 +0300, Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
> Does tvtime work with fglrx drivers on Debian Squeeze ?
I don't see why not :-?
That is, it can have problems but no more than other proprietary drivers,
like nvidia.
> I have to replace the old nvidia graphics ca
Hi list.
Does tvtime work with fglrx drivers on Debian Squeeze ?
I have to replace the old nvidia graphics card and just wonder whether
to replace it with ATI HD5450.
Thanks in advance.
Best regards
Georgi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
I have the following configuration:
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz
ASUSTeK P8P67 Motherboard
ATI Technologies Inc Redwood PRO [Radeon HD 5500 Series] video card.
8GB of RAM
Debian 6.0.2 (squeeze) AMD64
I have two problems with fglrx. (The first listed is definitely worse.)
1. After
Hi All,
I've just replaced my old Dell Studio 1735 with a newer Dell Studio
1745. This comes with a Radeon HD 4500, and I'm having problems with
both "radeon" and "fglrx" drivers. Now using Debian Testing, which is
up-to-date.
Using "radeon" I g
Hi All,
I've just replaced my old Dell Studio 1735 with a newer Dell Studio
1745. This comes with a Radeon HD 4500, and I'm having problems with
both "radeon" and "fglrx" drivers. Now using Debian Testing, which is
up-to-date.
Using "radeon" I g
14/04/2011 09:26, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Somewhere this week the video card performance dropped spectacularly.
> All drag and drop operations and (web) page scrolling are suddenly
> excruciating slow. Glxgears went from > 5000 to 60 frames per second (I
> know, glxgears is no benchmark
Hi,
Somewhere this week the video card performance dropped spectacularly.
All drag and drop operations and (web) page scrolling are suddenly
excruciating slow. Glxgears went from > 5000 to 60 frames per second (I
know, glxgears is no benchmark). Also my screen is not painted
correctly: it seems th
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 09:06:18AM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
> According to the log file I have the following errors:
>
> $ grep EE /var/log/Xorg.0.log
> (EE) fglrx(0): ACPI: DRM connection failed
> (EE) fglrx(0): ACPI: DRM connection failed
> (EE) fglrx(0): atidd
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Andrei Popescu
wrote:
> On Ma, 15 mar 11, 09:06:18, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>>
>> $ aticonfig --initial
>> Found fglrx primary device section
>> Unable to find any supported Screen sections
>
> Assuming you followed those steps *
On Ma, 15 mar 11, 09:06:18, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
> $ aticonfig --initial
> Found fglrx primary device section
> Unable to find any supported Screen sections
Assuming you followed those steps *exactly* and there were no errors,
remove xorg.conf and retry the 'aticonfi
Hi,
I decided to use the fglrx driver on my linux squeeze system as the
3D seemed a bit slow on my machine. Here is my setup:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Manhattan
[Mobility Radeon HD 5000 Series]
I followed the steps for squeeze from the page:
http
o I made a dumb mistake of trying to
> >> set up the #@%&! fglrx driver.
> >You can force an update with "sudo /etc/dron.daily/mlocate".
> >Confirm that the cruft is indeed left behind. In which case, you
> >might
> >wish to inquire about the raptu
o I made a dumb mistake of trying to
> >> set up the #@%&! fglrx driver.
> >I'd divert/rename/tar off the relevant files, test to see if the
> >Universe implodes, and if it doesn't, not stress life too much
> >afterward.
>
> We don't have Univer
Dne, 11. 03. 2011 01:49:58 je Karl Vogel napisal(a):
And the award for "Subject line that sounds dirtiest without actually
being
dirty" goes to...
Well, thanx, but you're being too generous. Can't take credit for the
names 'fglrx', 'lint' or &
Dne, 11. 03. 2011 06:00:18 je Dr. Ed Morbius napisal(a):
on 21:03 Thu 10 Mar, Klistvud (quotati...@aliceadsl.fr) wrote:
> Howdie, fellow Debianites!
>
> Upon installing Squeeze weeks ago I made a dumb mistake of trying to
> set up the #@%&! fglrx driver.
Via a Debian pac
on 21:03 Thu 10 Mar, Klistvud (quotati...@aliceadsl.fr) wrote:
> Howdie, fellow Debianites!
>
> Upon installing Squeeze weeks ago I made a dumb mistake of trying to
> set up the #@%&! fglrx driver.
Via a Debian package?
> I then set up the free radeon driver and am ver
Sorry for the double post; Balsa mail having a fit again...
--
Cheerio,
Klistvud
http://bufferoverflow.tiddlyspot.com
Certifiable Loonix User #481801 Please reply to the list, not to
me.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Howdie, fellow Debianites!
Upon installing Squeeze weeks ago I made a dumb mistake of trying to
set up the #@%&! fglrx driver. I then set up the free radeon driver and
am very satisfied with it. However, the attempted fglrx install seems
to have left some spurious files scattered ove
Howdie, fellow Debianites!
Upon installing Squeeze weeks ago I made a dumb mistake of trying to
set up the #@%&! fglrx driver. I then set up the free radeon driver and
am very satisfied with it. However, the attempted fglrx install seems
to have left some spurious files scattered ove
re not
> there.?
This step is necessary so that you can switch to fglrx *without
rebooting*, because on the next reboot there will already be other
mechanisms in place to prevent those modules from loading at all.
Hope this answers your question,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian
I followed the steps in :
http://wiki.debian.org/ATIProprietary
and it was successfull.
But
# modprobe -r radeon drm
didnt work .
So is this step necessary , since when we reboot those modules are not there.?
aprekates
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 17:17 -0700, Frank Miles wrote:
> Yesterday's update included the non-free fglrx driver. At least
> I think that is what is causing iceweasel to erratically blacken/erase/wipe
> many of the pages.
>
> Are others experiencing this? The browser has beco
Yesterday's update included the non-free fglrx driver. At least
I think that is what is causing iceweasel to erratically blacken/erase/wipe
many of the pages.
Are others experiencing this? The browser has become almost completely
unusable.
Or was there some other update affecting the br
On 2010-06-18 15:20 +0200, Matteo Riva wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
There is a new kernel in squeeze that includes shiny KMS framebuffer
drivers for both Radeon and Nvidia cards. These are incompatible with
the proprietary blobs from ATI and Nvid
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>> There is a new kernel in squeeze that includes shiny KMS framebuffer
>>> drivers for both Radeon and Nvidia cards. These are incompatible with
>>> the proprietary blobs from ATI and Nvidia.
>>
>> Can you point me to more information on thi
On 2010-06-17 19:00 +0200, Matteo Riva wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> In the subject line you talk about ATI fglrx. So what graphics card do
>> you have?
>
> I'm sorry, my card is a Mobility Radeon 3430.
>
>> There is
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> In the subject line you talk about ATI fglrx. So what graphics card do
> you have?
I'm sorry, my card is a Mobility Radeon 3430.
> There is a new kernel in squeeze that includes shiny KMS framebuffer
> drivers for both
On 2010-06-17 18:34 +0200, Matteo Riva wrote:
> I have looked for info on this but haven't found any. Since a couple of
> days I can't boot X anymore with my usual nvidia drivers setup.
In the subject line you talk about ATI fglrx. So what graphics card do
you have?
> All
I have looked for info on this but haven't found any. Since a couple of
days I can't boot X anymore with my usual nvidia drivers setup. All I
get is a blank screen with no way out, not even CTRL+ALT+Fn. My system
is testing, updated daily.
Is there any known issue causing this?
Thanks.
--
T
> Anyone have any idea why compiz won't work with newer fglrx drivers?
I don't. But I have use the `radeon' driver with compiz. Have you
tried it? It's better for your karma and won't suffer from those kinds
of problems you're experiencing.
Stef
I upgraded my machine at work today, and among other things that were
installed, aptitude upgraded the kernel (linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64) as well
as the fglrx packages. I had the 9-11 held, but aptitude upgraded it anyway.
And with the combination of packages, I was no longer able to roll back to
ot;effects" enabled) machines
running Sid's fglrx at the moment and they seem fine, glxinfo and fglrxinfo
doesn't spit any error, xorg logs doesn't contain errors, and the few OpenGl
stuff I just tried are working fine (namely "Torcs" and "xmoto").
Hi
everyo
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:43 AM, tv.deb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
> Hi, what exactly is broken ?
> As a workaround you could use Sid packages if Squeeze's are in bad shape. I
> have two mostly Squeeze (amd64, kde with desktop "effects" enabled) machines
> running Sid
Le 03/05/2010 11:43, Camaleón a écrit :
On Mon, 03 May 2010 01:48:02 -0400, Zachary Uram wrote:
This sucks. Stupid closed source drivers cause such problems. Any
workaround I can do?
I need to build the fglrx driver for debian squeeze (ati radeon hd 4550
card), but I just saw this bug
saying
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:48 AM, Zachary Uram wrote:
> This sucks. Stupid closed source drivers cause such problems.
Agreed. Specifically, the fglrx driver. I don't have problems with nvidia,
but when fglrx-9-12 came out, it broke compiz, so I reinstalled 9-11, and
put it on hold. I
On Mon, 03 May 2010 01:48:02 -0400, Zachary Uram wrote:
> This sucks. Stupid closed source drivers cause such problems. Any
> workaround I can do?
>
> I need to build the fglrx driver for debian squeeze (ati radeon hd 4550
> card), but I just saw this bug
> saying the packages
1 - 100 of 343 matches
Mail list logo
