>
>
>
> We just had this discussion.
>
> > Subject: ISS is running GNU Linux Debian :)
> > Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 21:39:02 +0100
>
Great, thanks. I"ll take a look at that thread.
--
Pete Orrall
p...@cs1x.com
www.peteorrall.com
"If there isn't a way, I'll make one."
On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 22:57:56 +0800
Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
> Subject: International Space Station adopts Debian Linux, drops
> Windows & Red Hat into airlock
We just had this discussion.
> Subject: ISS is running GNU Linux Debian :)
> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 202
>
>
>
> Seriusly?
>
> Published: 13 May 2013
>
I saw that too. I'm curious to know what OS(es) are *currently* being used
aboard the ISS. Is Debian still used?
--
Pete Orrall
p...@cs1x.com
www.peteorrall.com
"If there isn't a way, I'll make one."
On 16/02/2022 14:57, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
Good day from Singapore,
Just sharing.
Seriusly?
Published: 13 May 2013
Haha
--
With kindest regards, Piotr.
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal operating system
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org/
⠈⠳⣄
Subject: International Space Station adopts Debian Linux, drops
Windows & Red Hat into airlock
Good day from Singapore,
Just sharing.
Link to the article:
https://www.computerweekly.com/blog/Open-Source-Insider/International-Space-Station-adopts-Debian-Linux-drops-Windows-Red-Hat-into-air
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 02:30:19PM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> I'm a longtime user of Red Hat-style distributions (RHL, RHEL, CentOS,
> Fedora, etc.). My home router/firewall is a 32-bit VIA C7 system that
> is currently running CentOS 6. I really want to move this to a more
&
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:41 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby <
> mihamina.rakotomandi...@rktmb.org> wrote:
>
>> On 04/26/2015 10:30 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
>>
>>> Does anyone know of any good resources (books, web sites, etc.) to help
>>> an experienced "Red Hat gu
Does anyone know of any good resources (books, web sites, etc.) to help
>> an experienced "Red Hat guy" make the transition?
>>
>
> This really depends on the complexity of your setup.
>
> Network is configured from different files, for example.
> Apache has diffe
On 04/26/2015 10:30 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
Does anyone know of any good resources (books, web sites, etc.) to help
an experienced "Red Hat guy" make the transition?
This really depends on the complexity of your setup.
Network is configured from different files, for example.
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 09:04:21PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 26 April 2015 20:46:22 Ric Moore wrote:
> > On 04/26/2015 03:30 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> > > I'm a longtime user of Red Hat-style distributions (RHL, RHEL, CentOS,
> > > Fedora, etc.). My home
On Sunday 26 April 2015 20:46:22 Ric Moore wrote:
> On 04/26/2015 03:30 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> > I'm a longtime user of Red Hat-style distributions (RHL, RHEL, CentOS,
> > Fedora, etc.). My home router/firewall is a 32-bit VIA C7 system that
> > is currently running C
On 04/26/2015 03:30 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
I'm a longtime user of Red Hat-style distributions (RHL, RHEL, CentOS,
Fedora, etc.). My home router/firewall is a 32-bit VIA C7 system that
is currently running CentOS 6. I really want to move this to a more
modern stable distribution, but Re
I'm a longtime user of Red Hat-style distributions (RHL, RHEL, CentOS,
Fedora, etc.). My home router/firewall is a 32-bit VIA C7 system that
is currently running CentOS 6. I really want to move this to a more
modern stable distribution, but Red Hat has abandoned 32-bit platforms
with R
m and onto
a running Linux system, by putting it on its disk and then
chrooting into it, some people likes to do it that way.
..based on my own Red Hat experience (RH-5.2 thru 9.0), I
could be moved both ways, either the debootstrap dance, or
play with the various Debian etc LiveCD|USB|DVD r
On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 17:06 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 05:46:07PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > In this case I suspect CC is wanted ;). I don't think the OP is
> > subscribed to this list.
>
> You may well be right, but how to know? If one posts requests for help on
> a
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 05:46:07PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> In this case I suspect CC is wanted ;). I don't think the OP is
> subscribed to this list.
You may well be right, but how to know? If one posts requests for help on
a mailing list, I think the onus is on one to read the list afterwar
On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 17:59 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> I recommend the OP to switch from Arch to
Red had, sorry, a Freudian slip
> http://www.debian.org/CD/http-ftp/#stable
> while I'm writing from Ubuntu ;D ... but in your case I suspect that
> Debian stab
I recommend the OP to switch from Arch to
http://www.debian.org/CD/http-ftp/#stable
while I'm writing from Ubuntu ;D ... but in your case I suspect that
Debian stable is what you need.
Somebody might correct me, but IIRC only
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.4/i386/iso-cd/debian-6.0.4-i386-
On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 17:36 +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> point him to e.g.: ...
> http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/apds03.html.en
>
> ...so he can learn how to play with Debian toys 'n tools. ;o)
Grandiose :)
You just forget to CC.
> From: Jon Dowland
>
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 11:
On Sat, 12 May 2012 04:36:20 -0500, Indulekha wrote in message
<20120512093620.GA7588@radhesyama>:
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 02:13:37AM -0700, onlymahend...@yahoo.com
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Dear sir,
> >
> >
> > I am trying to
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 11:48:17AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Isn't it possible to write to this list, without being subscribed?
> Perhaps this person doesn't receive mails from the list :D, I guess we
> need too CC.
It is, but the mailing list code of conduct says
> When replying to messages o
On Sat, 12 May 2012 04:36:20 -0500, Indulekha wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 02:13:37AM -0700, onlymahend...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> Dear sir,
>>
>>
>> I am trying to install xipdump-1.5.2.tgz on my Red hat Linux 5
>> Enterprise Edi
On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 04:36 -0500, Indulekha wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 02:13:37AM -0700, onlymahend...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >
> >
> > Dear sir,
> >
> >
> > I am trying to install xipdump-1.5.2.tgz on my Red hat Linux 5
> > E
I didn't find a mailing list for Red Hat, but you might try a forum,
e.g.:
http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/red-hat-fedora-linux/
Debian is a Linux distro too, but different to Red Hat.
Hth,
Ralf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "u
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 02:13:37AM -0700, onlymahend...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>
> Dear sir,
>
>
> I am trying to install xipdump-1.5.2.tgz on my Red hat Linux 5
> Enterprise Edition operating system. But while installation it shows
> many errors. Can yo
Dear sir,
I am trying to install xipdump-1.5.2.tgz on my Red hat Linux
5 Enterprise Edition operating system. But while installation it shows many
errors. Can you tell me how to install this software. Is there any other
packages needed to install. pl reply...
Regards,
Mahendra Patil
Development discussions related to Fedora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Fwd: Wikipidia - Goodbye Red Hat and Fedora]
X-TDMailSerialnumber: 8543641
forwarding message from Rodrigo Padula
a
On 09/19/2008 12:58 AM, Sebastian Günther wrote:
* Star Liu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [19.09.08 06:46]:
4. Do Debian has the danger of IP lawsuits "created" by microsoft?
I would say no, and just because there is no money to get from Debian.
Remember this is just about money...
No, it's about
pe i can get more information about this.
> 1. If Novel Suse is so obviously not friendly to free software world,
> why so many people still use it? does it mean people who use Suse do
> not have the spirit of free software?
> 2. I also know that Enterprise Edition of Red hat is not a
e things, they want their
computer to Just Work. Many people (especially in Germany?) think that
"you get what you pay for", so a free distribution can't be good. But
don't forget there is also OpenSuse.
> 2. I also know that Enterprise Edition of Red hat is not a free
>
of it.
>> 1. If Novel Suse is so obviously not friendly to free software world,
>> why so many people still use it? does it mean people who use Suse do
>> not have the spirit of free software?
>> 2. I also know that Enterprise Edition of Red hat is not a free
>> distribut
software?
> 2. I also know that Enterprise Edition of Red hat is not a free
> distribution, so does it mean Red hat do not have the spirit of free
> software?
> 3. Shall Debian follow the way of Red hat to have a nonfree enterprise
> edition?
Before I can answer: what definition of fr
friendly to free software world,
why so many people still use it? does it mean people who use Suse do
not have the spirit of free software?
2. I also know that Enterprise Edition of Red hat is not a free
distribution, so does it mean Red hat do not have the spirit of free
software?
3. Shall Debian follow
First, RedHat has a business product which is more stable than Fedora
deliberately. Second, unless I'm much mistaken RedHat also offers its
business customers phone support for fees. Third, RedHat was the first
distro in Government and business took note of that decision and followed
along wi
Am 2008-03-17 20:05:43, schrieb Ron Johnson:
> Except when that $90 bottle of wine is really vinegar, but wine
> snobs insist that it's delicious.
:-/
> Or that Windows is s much better than Linux, because Linux is cheap.
Hmmm, IF I count the time, I have invested in my beloved Debian GNU/Li
Am 2008-03-21 00:32:11, schrieb Andrei Popescu:
> This is very much a reality in my country. I had friends laugh at me
> when I told them Linux is free (piracy in Romania is estimated to be
> more than 90%).
:-)
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
24V
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 08:58:51PM -0400, Curt Howland wrote:
> > Now that's interesting and clever...
>
> Did you ever see the article "Windows Is Free"?
>
> It goes into this perceived value thing, too.
>
> http://tlug.jp/articles/Windows_Is_Free
This is very much a reality in my country. I
* Matthew Macdonald-Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008 Mar 18 04:18 -0500]:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:43:01 -0500
> Nate Bargmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Perhaps it is something uniquely American, but the key to
> > understanding Ron's association is the wine tasting example given in
> > th
* Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008 Mar 18 17:50 -0500]:
> On Tue, March 18, 2008 2:39 pm, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > * Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008 Mar 18 15:09 -0500]:
> >> > On 03/17/08 20:43, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> >> >> Perhaps it is something uniquely American, but the key to underst
>
> And I gather that the two that posted about not reading it that I
> replied to are not in the USA where such a salacious lead-in works all
> too well quite often.
>
I basically clicked on the link, then saw the headline, did a search for the
word linux (which I could not find it, btw) and t
On Tue, March 18, 2008 2:39 pm, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008 Mar 18 15:09 -0500]:
>> > On 03/17/08 20:43, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>> >> Perhaps it is something uniquely American, but the key to understanding
>> >> Ron's association is the wine tasting example given in
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 22:39, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008 Mar 18 15:09 -0500]:
> > On Mon, March 17, 2008 10:10 pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > On 03/17/08 20:43, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > >> Perhaps it is something uniquely American, but the key to
> > >> understand
* Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008 Mar 18 15:09 -0500]:
> On Mon, March 17, 2008 10:10 pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On 03/17/08 20:43, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> >> Perhaps it is something uniquely American, but the key to understanding
> >> Ron's association is the wine tasting example given in the
On Mon, March 17, 2008 10:10 pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 03/17/08 20:43, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>> Perhaps it is something uniquely American, but the key to understanding
>> Ron's association is the wine tasting example given in the article. As
>> mentioned earlier in the thread, the sex scandal men
On Mon, March 17, 2008 7:18 pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 03/17/08 21:10, steve wrote:
>> Jeff D wrote:
>> .com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/16/AR2008031602168.html
>> |>> Looks like the article is about Elliot Spitzer.
>> |> Same here. I do not know how it i
* Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-18 09:43:49 -0700]:
> In my experience, it is. Working upper management in a small company
> some years back, we had to constantly watch what we did because it was
> so easy to think just that.
This is true. I went through the same thing in
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 08:50:46PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
...
> If you follow the article Ron linked to above, special discounts are
> apparently subject to the same effect. In a study where people took
> supposedly mind-enhancing placebo drinks, people who drank the more
> expensive ver
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 12:10:48AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
...
> Back to computers:
>We're such a successful company, we can afford to buy Tier 1 kit,
>and send all that money to MSFT. And because we do, we *must*
>be getting good stuff.
>
> (If that is, actually, an actual upper
Ron Johnson wrote:
Back to computers:
We're such a successful company, we can afford to buy Tier 1 kit,
and send all that money to MSFT. And because we do, we *must*
be getting good stuff.
(If that is, actually, an actual upper-management though process.)
"upper management thought pr
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:43:01 -0500
Nate Bargmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps it is something uniquely American, but the key to
> understanding Ron's association is the wine tasting example given in
> the article. As mentioned earlier in the thread, the sex scandal
> mentioned only guaran
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 00:02:40 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 03/17/08 23:12, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > Well, I don't about other countries, but in France you can get the new
> > office
> > 2007 for free from $M. I guess, people are not going to like it? [smile]
>
> Does $M sta
t;> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/16/AR2008031
>>>> 602168.html
>>> Sorry to be the one who breaks the embarrassing news to you but the above
>>> url led me to something related to *sex scandal*, from which I failed to
>>> compr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/17/08 23:12, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
[snip]
>
> Well, I don't about other countries, but in France you can get the new office
> 2007 for free from $M. I guess, people are not going to like it? [smile]
Does $M stand for $ado-Masochism? :)
- -
Damon L. Chesser wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
>>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/16/AR2008031602168.html
DC: quoted some 23 lines of RJ's message, including
signature block, and added one line of text:
Well, That explains why people use MS.
Please trim posts b
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 04:50, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:30:24PM +0530, Raj Kiran Grandhi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> > Ron Johnson wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >>
> >> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/artic
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:30:24PM +0530, Raj Kiran Grandhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/16/AR2008031602168.html
>
> Interesting. This reminds me
.html
> >
> > Sorry to be the one who breaks the embarrassing news to you but the above
> > url led me to something related to *sex scandal*, from which I failed to
> > comprehend Why Red Hat is the "business" distro.
>
> Same for me!
Perhaps it is something
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 17 March 2008, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard
to say:
> > This, he says, has the benefit of making those people think that
> > they are getting a product worth a lot for free because they
> > happen to know someone who is an 'insi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/17/08 21:10, steve wrote:
> Jeff D wrote:
> .com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/16/AR2008031602168.html
> |>
> |>> Looks like the article is about Elliot Spitzer.
> |>>
> |>>
> |>
> |> Sa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff D wrote:
.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/16/AR2008031602168.html
|>
|>> Looks like the article is about Elliot Spitzer.
|>>
|>>
|>
|> Same here. I do not know how it is related to Red Hat.
|>
|> raju
|
| um,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/17/08 20:51, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
[snip]
> How much did your link cost?
Huh?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
"Working with women is a pain in the a**."
My wife
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQF
which I failed to
comprehend Why Red Hat is the "business" distro.
Send me $2500 US and I will explain it to you. You know it has to be good!
--
Damon L. Chesser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/17/08 14:57, Steve Lamb wrote:
On Mon, March 17, 2008 7:29 am, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/16/AR2008031602168.
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/17/08 14:57, Steve Lamb wrote:
On Mon, March 17, 2008 7:29 am, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/16/AR2008031602168.
Ron Johnson wrote the following on 03/17/2008 07:42 PM:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/17/08 14:57, Steve Lamb wrote:
On Mon, March 17, 2008 7:29 am, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/
>
>
> On 03/17/08 14:57, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > On Mon, March 17, 2008 7:29 am, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >
> >>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/16/AR2008031602168.html
> >
> >
> > Er, Ron? Wrong C&P? This links
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/17/08 19:58, Alexander Samad wrote:
> Quoting Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> On 03/17/08 14:57, Steve Lamb wrote:
>>> On Mon, March 17, 2008 7:29 am, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03
above
> url led me to something related to *sex scandal*, from which I failed to
> comprehend Why Red Hat is the "business" distro.
>
>
> --
> Tong (remove underscore(s) to reply)
Same for me!
Thierry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am I the only one on this list who can see that people who think
> that expensive wines and energy drinks are "better" than cheap wines
> and energy drinks just might also think that expensive operating
> systems are bett
Quoting Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/17/08 14:57, Steve Lamb wrote:
On Mon, March 17, 2008 7:29 am, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/16/AR200
to
comprehend Why Red Hat is the "business" distro.
--
Tong (remove underscore(s) to reply)
http://xpt.sourceforge.net/techdocs/
http://xpt.sourceforge.net/tools/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/17/08 14:57, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Mon, March 17, 2008 7:29 am, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>
>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/16/AR2008031602168.html
>
>
> Er, Ron
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Monday 17 March 2008 07:29:17 am Ron Johnson wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/16/AR2008031602168.html
Looks like the article is about Elliot Spitzer.
Same here. I do not know how it is related to Red
On Mon, March 17, 2008 7:29 am, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/16/AR2008031602168.html
Er, Ron? Wrong C&P? This links to an article about Spitzer.
--
Steve Lamb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Monday 17 March 2008 07:29:17 am Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/16/AR2008031602168.html
>
> Looks like the article is about Elliot Spitzer.
>
>
Same here. I do not know how it is r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/17/08 15:17, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Monday 17 March 2008 07:29:17 am Ron Johnson wrote:
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/16/AR2008031602168.html
>
> Looks like the article is about Elliot Spitzer.
People who read
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/17/08 12:00, Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/16/AR2008031602168.html
>>
>
> Interesting. This reminds me of some article I read somewhere regarding
> the perception
On Monday 17 March 2008 07:29:17 am Ron Johnson wrote:
>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/16/AR2008031602168.html
Looks like the article is about Elliot Spitzer.
--
Paul Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/16/AR2008031602168.html
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
"Working with women is a pain in the a**."
My wife
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/16/AR2008031602168.html
Interesting. This reminds me of some article I read somewhere regarding
the perception that people tend to take things that are free as in bee
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/16/AR2008031602168.html
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
"Working with women is a pain in the a**."
My wife
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/16/AR2008031602168.html
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
"Working with women is a pain in the a**."
My wife
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH
ian box
> that I have. I can telnet to the machine from Red Hat and Windows
> machines. When I send a telnet request from the Debian box I don't get
> a reply and the telnet request times out.
>
> What makes this particularly puzzling (to me, at least) is that the
> Debi
This is a really bizarre situation. I have not been able to send mail to a
specific Windows mail server at cw2.coreweb.com from a Postfix server on Debian.
I cannot telnet to port 25 on the Windows machine from any Debian box that I
have. I can telnet to the machine from Red Hat and Windows
* Adam Funk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040217 00:48]:
> On Monday 16 February 2004 21:30, Vineet Kumar wrote:
>
> (1)
> > So it doesn't matter what distribution your rpm was targetted for; in
> > most cases, it's not debian, and installing it on your debian system
> > will most likely result in a system
On Monday 16 February 2004 21:30, Vineet Kumar wrote:
(1)
> So it doesn't matter what distribution your rpm was targetted for; in
> most cases, it's not debian, and installing it on your debian system
> will most likely result in a system which is in violation of debian
> policy. This doesn't nec
* Leandro GuimarÃes Faria Corsetti Dutra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040216 13:17]:
> On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:39:00 -0600, Benjamin Sher wrote:
>
> > can "alien" convert from Fedora Core RPM as well as Red
> > Hat RPM? More importantly: Does it make a difference?
>
>
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:39:00 -0600, Benjamin Sher wrote:
> can "alien" convert from Fedora Core RPM as well as Red
> Hat RPM? More importantly: Does it make a difference?
Possibly in policy. As you are violating policy anyway by using RPM, it
shouldn't worse
Dear friends:
A quick question: can "alien" convert from Fedora Core RPM as well as Red Hat
RPM? More importantly: Does it make a difference?
Thank you.
Benjamin
--
Sher's Russian Web
http://www.websher.net
Benjamin and Anna Sher
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On 2004-02-12, Pedro M. penned:
> Monique Y. Herman wrote:
>
>>(If it helps, I backed up the data, /etc directory, etc from a RedHat
>>install several years ago and was able to migrate all the settings to
>>Debian pretty easily. Got it up and running in a day. So I really
>>don't see much need to
Monique Y. Herman wrote:
On 2004-02-11, System Administrator penned:
I am about to cobvert a system from Red Hat to Debian. Idealy I would
do a fresh install from scratch, but am trying to avoid this. While
at the Linux Expo in NYC last month, the Debian Booth people
reccomended a program
Incoming from Monique Y. Herman:
> On 2004-02-11, System Administrator penned:
> > I am about to cobvert a system from Red Hat to Debian. Idealy I would
> > do a fresh install from scratch, but am trying to avoid this. While
>
> But I'd strongly suggest biting the bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
System Administrator wrote:
I am about to cobvert a system from Red Hat to Debian. Idealy I would
do a fresh install from scratch, but am trying to avoid this. While
at the Linux Expo in NYC last month, the Debian Booth people
reccomended a
On 2004-02-11, System Administrator penned:
> I am about to cobvert a system from Red Hat to Debian. Idealy I would
> do a fresh install from scratch, but am trying to avoid this. While
> at the Linux Expo in NYC last month, the Debian Booth people
> reccomended a program that
I am about to cobvert a system from Red Hat to Debian. Idealy I would do a
fresh install from scratch, but am trying to avoid this. While at the Linux
Expo in NYC last month, the Debian Booth people reccomended a program that I
think they reffered to as "Debian Hijack" or somethi
apt-get in an option
fedora is heavier and bugged
if you want to use redhat prefer shrike (redhat 9)
Ark
Kent West wrote:
> Alex Malinovich wrote:
>
>>Ok, it seems that my previous thread was broadly misunderstood on this
>>topic, so my apologies for not expressing myself more clearly.
>>
> Don
Alex Malinovich wrote:
Ok, it seems that my previous thread was broadly misunderstood on this
topic, so my apologies for not expressing myself more clearly.
Don't feel too bad; it was my impression (and just my impression - I'm
not accusing anyone of anything) that you did not say anything wrong
Ok, it seems that my previous thread was broadly misunderstood on this
topic, so my apologies for not expressing myself more clearly. Any other
considerations notwithstanding, what are the structural differences
between Fedora and Debian? So far I know that documents are in a
different path, and Ri
on Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 01:54:46PM -0500, M. Kirchhoff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Don Werve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >>For those wealthy enough to attend college, many
> >>will attain near-useless English and Liberal Arts degrees, because >>they
> >>lack the impetus, drive, and determination t
Don Werve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>For those wealthy enough to attend college, many
>>will attain near-useless English and Liberal Arts degrees, because >>they
>>lack the impetus, drive, and determination to pursue a more difficult
>>degree.
Pigeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>which means that u
1 - 100 of 851 matches
Mail list logo
