* Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008 Mar 18 17:50 -0500]: > On Tue, March 18, 2008 2:39 pm, Nate Bargmann wrote: > > * Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008 Mar 18 15:09 -0500]: > >> > On 03/17/08 20:43, Nate Bargmann wrote: > >> >> Perhaps it is something uniquely American, but the key to understanding > >> >> Ron's association is the wine tasting example given in the article. As > >> >> mentioned earlier in the thread, the sex scandal mentioned only > >> >> guaranteed more people would read the article. > > >> >> Hmmmm, kind of proves the point! > > >> Not really, Nate, look how many people didn't read the article because > >> of the sex scandal lead. :P > > > And I gather that the two that posted about not reading it that I > > replied to are not in the USA where such a salacious lead-in works all > > too well quite often. > > I was one of the two and am very much an American. :P
Hmmm, not the way Mutt threaded things here. I replied to Thierry who had replied to TONG who had replied to Ron. No matter, really. :-) - Nate >> -- "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
