On Tuesday 18 March 2008 22:39, Nate Bargmann wrote: > * Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008 Mar 18 15:09 -0500]: > > On Mon, March 17, 2008 10:10 pm, Ron Johnson wrote: > > > On 03/17/08 20:43, Nate Bargmann wrote: > > >> Perhaps it is something uniquely American, but the key to > > >> understanding Ron's association is the wine tasting example given in > > >> the article. As mentioned earlier in the thread, the sex scandal > > >> mentioned only guaranteed more people would read the article. > > >> > > >> Hmmmm, kind of proves the point! > > > > Not really, Nate, look how many people didn't read the article > > because of the sex scandal lead. :P > > And I gather that the two that posted about not reading it that I > replied to are not in the USA where such a salacious lead-in works all > too well quite often. >
No, I read it, I was only saying I got to the same page as Tong, meaning: read it again.. Thierry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
