Re: please delete me from your mailing lists

Hi, On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 05:39:32PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > Maybe the List-Unsubscribe header would help, > . The list software can > add it without worrying about breaking DKIM signatures. > > A good user agent would display a UI widget to

Re: please delete me from your mailing lists

On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 12:04 PM Andy Smith wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 05:48:01PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote: > > Perhaps, the List Administrators could find worthwhile, to add a footer to > > the mailing list messages, something like > > > > "To unsubscribe, change your subscription mode, or

Re: please delete me from your mailing lists

On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 4:13 PM Bret Busby wrote: > > On 21/7/25 03:06, Lee wrote: > > > > > It's in the mail headers - which the 'please unsubscribe me' people > > don't know exists, > > "There are more things, in heaven and earth,

Re: please delete me from your mailing lists

On 21/7/25 03:06, Lee wrote: It's in the mail headers - which the 'please unsubscribe me' people don't know exists, "There are more things, in heaven and earth, than man has ever dreamed of"... :) Not only the " 'please unsubscribe me' peopl

Re: please delete me from your mailing lists

r your confirmation reply has been received. > > > > > Perhaps, the List Administrators could find worthwhile, to add a footer > to the mailing list messages, something like > > "To unsubscribe, change your subscription mode, or view the list > archive, see https://list

Re: please delete me from your mailing lists

* On 2025 20 Jul 12:08 -0500, Nicolas George wrote: > Dan Purgert (HE12025-07-20): > > Sorry, I meant digital signatures. Mailing list messing with the body > > means that the signature is no longer valid. > > Strange, I have in my archives mails from that mailing-list that are > digitally signed

Re: please delete me from your mailing lists

Dan Purgert (HE12025-07-20): > Sorry, I meant digital signatures. Mailing list messing with the body > means that the signature is no longer valid. Strange, I have in my archives mails from that mailing-list that are digitally signed, where a footer with unsubscribe instructions was added, and mu

Re: please delete me from your mailing lists

On Jul 20, 2025, Nicolas George wrote: > Dan Purgert (HE12025-07-20): > > And it'd break signatures for those of us who use them. I *hated* yahoo > > groups (and, now, groups.io) for doing that. > > Can you explain what it means? I am subscribed to > a

Re: please delete me from your mailing lists

Dan Purgert (HE12025-07-20): > And it'd break signatures for those of us who use them. I *hated* yahoo > groups (and, now, groups.io) for doing that. Can you explain what it means? I am subscribed to and I do not observe anything that looks like breaki

Re: please delete me from your mailing lists

On Jul 20, 2025, Andy Smith wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 05:48:01PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote: > > Perhaps, the List Administrators could find worthwhile, to add a footer to > > the mailing list messages, something like > > > > "To unsubscribe, change your subscription mode, or view the

Re: please delete me from your mailing lists

Hi, On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 05:48:01PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote: > Perhaps, the List Administrators could find worthwhile, to add a footer to > the mailing list messages, something like > > "To unsubscribe, change your subscription mode, or view the list archive, > see https://lists.debian.org/deb

Re: please delete me from your mailing lists

On 20/7/25 17:37, Thomas Southerland wrote: On 7/20/25 5:21 AM, Mathew Alexander wrote: Mathew Alexander mat...@gmail.com WebRep Overall rating WebRep Overall rating To unsubscribe from this list, send "unsubscribe" in the message subject to: -requ...@lists.debian.org and you will

Re: please delete me from your mailing lists

On 7/20/25 5:21 AM, Mathew Alexander wrote: Mathew Alexander mat...@gmail.com WebRep Overall rating WebRep Overall rating To unsubscribe from this list, send "unsubscribe" in the message subject to: -requ...@lists.debian.org and you will be removed after your confirmation reply h

please delete me from your mailing lists

Mathew Alexander mat...@gmail.com WebRep Overall rating WebRep Overall rating

Please, double-check the URLs you post [was: SDD partitioning and allocations]

> On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 04:31:08PM -, Greg wrote: [...] > > https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/12/5928?utm_source=chatgpt.com ^^^ The above URL works *without* that pesky query string. Why do you have to promote that sleazy or

Re: Using MUAs to bounce mail (was: Please, don't reply to spam ...)

Ralph Aichinger (HE12025-06-29): > Nothing related to spam or server-side bouncing, or maybe even to the > intended purpose of bouncing, but I absolutely love bouncing mails > in mutt instead of forwarding. I need some mail on the address > I use on my mobile: Just bounce it. I only do this to my

Re: Using MUAs to bounce mail (was: Please, don't reply to spam ...)

On Sun, Jun 29, 2025 at 10:47:43AM +, Andy Smith wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jun 29, 2025 at 11:55:56AM +0200, Ralph Aichinger wrote: > > I absolutely love bouncing mails in mutt instead of forwarding. I need > > some mail on the address I use on my mobile: Just bounce it. I only do > > this to m

Re: Using MUAs to bounce mail (was: Please, don't reply to spam ...)

Hi, On Sun, Jun 29, 2025 at 11:55:56AM +0200, Ralph Aichinger wrote: > I absolutely love bouncing mails in mutt instead of forwarding. I need > some mail on the address I use on my mobile: Just bounce it. I only do > this to my own mail addresses. > > Am I alone in this use case of bounces? Or is

Using MUAs to bounce mail (was: Please, don't reply to spam ...)

On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 10:58:54AM +0900, John Crawley wrote: > I think "bouncing" is something that should really be done on a > server, not by a user email agent, even a "good" one. Nothing related to spam or server-side bouncing, or maybe even to the intended purpose of bouncing, but I absolut

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list

to...@tuxteam.de (HE12025-06-28): > MUA "bounce" is not exactly the same (the user has a chance to > specify *which* address to send the bounce to, for one), but > technically so close (as much of the headers as possible remains > unchanged), that calling it a bounce does make sense. This is not a

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list

On Sat, Jun 28, 2025 at 11:52:33AM +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote: > Am Sa, Jun 28, 2025 at 10:11:09 +0900 schrieb John Crawley: > > > It is not the accepted meaning of the term. > > > https://github.com/mjg59/jargon/blob/master/bounce > > Mutt seems to have its own set of definitions which mutt users

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list

Am Sa, Jun 28, 2025 at 10:11:09 +0900 schrieb John Crawley: It is not the accepted meaning of the term. https://github.com/mjg59/jargon/blob/master/bounce Mutt seems to have its own set of definitions which mutt users will need to grasp. I can assure you that mutt’s meaning of bounce is older

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list [was: ግěcůžላኣዝዩ]

On 27/06/2025 23:46, Greg wrote: On 2025-06-27, Greg Wooledge wrote: Bounce can and does mean a rejection of the email by the *server*, so your proposal seems nonsensical or confusing, as the email has already been delivered to its recipients. I am not proposing anything. I am *explaining*.

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list [was: ግěcůžላኣዝዩ]

On 27/06/2025 17:44, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 05:04:14PM +0900, John Crawley wrote: BTW why does your message here have my email address as To:, and CC: to the list, even though I had no Reply-to: header in the message you are replying to? Because I replied using "group

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list

On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 16:43:00 +0200 Nicolas George wrote: > Do people our age need explaining that words can have multiple > meanings, especially technical words used in different fields? Hear, hear. Especially after this thread has shown exactly that to a fault. -- Does anybody read signatures

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list [was: ግěcůžላኣዝዩ]

On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 10:47 AM Greg wrote: > > On 2025-06-27, Greg Wooledge wrote: > >> > >> Bounce can and does mean a rejection of the email by the *server*, so > >> your proposal seems nonsensical or confusing, as the email has > >> already been delivered to its recipients. > > > > I am not

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list [was: ግěcůžላኣዝዩ]

Greg (HE12025-06-27): > It is not the accepted meaning of the term. Did you not already tell that? Was not Greg Wooledge precisely replying to that? -- Nicolas George

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list [was: ግěcůžላኣዝዩ]

On 2025-06-27, Greg Wooledge wrote: >> >> Bounce can and does mean a rejection of the email by the *server*, so >> your proposal seems nonsensical or confusing, as the email has >> already been delivered to its recipients. > > I am not proposing anything. I am *explaining*. > > This is the termi

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list

Greg (HE12025-06-27): > What is a Bounce Email? Definition: A bounce email is an email that has > not been delivered to its recipient. It is sent back to the sender with > an error message. > > https://www.altospam.com/en/glossary/bounce/ Do people our age need explaining that not everything

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list [was: ግěcůžላኣዝዩ]

On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 13:46:40 -, Greg wrote: > On 2025-06-27, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > > To be clear, what we're talking about here is what mutt does when you > > press the "b" key. It queues up a message for delivery, where the > > Bounce can and does mean a rejection of the email by t

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list

On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 02:19:22PM -, Greg wrote: > What is a Bounce Email? Definition: A bounce email is an email that has > not been delivered to its recipient. It is sent back to the sender with > an error message. > > https://www.altospam.com/en/glossary/bounce/ The word "bounce" in

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list

On 2025-06-27, Nicolas George wrote: > Greg (HE12025-06-27): >> Bounce can and does mean a rejection of the email by the *server* > > No, that is not accurate. Server rejecting a mail and server bouncing a > mail are different mechanism. What is a Bounce Email? Definition: A bounce email is an

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list

Greg (HE12025-06-27): > Bounce can and does mean a rejection of the email by the *server* No, that is not accurate. Server rejecting a mail and server bouncing a mail are different mechanism. The server rejects the mail by returning an error code at SMTP level. No bounce is generated. If the ser

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list [was: ግěcůžላኣዝዩ]

On 2025-06-27, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > To be clear, what we're talking about here is what mutt does when you > press the "b" key. It queues up a message for delivery, where the Bounce can and does mean a rejection of the email by the *server*, so your proposal seems nonsensical or confusing, as

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list [was: ግěcůžላኣዝዩ]

On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 05:04:14PM +0900, John Crawley wrote: [...] > I may be wrong here but my understanding of "bounce" is that the software > responsible for delivering a message (what I referred to as the "server") > decides not to deliver it, and sends it back to the original address. So

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list [was: ግěcůžላኣዝዩ]

On 27/06/2025 16:13, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 10:58:54AM +0900, John Crawley wrote: [...] I think "bouncing" is something that should really be done on a server, not by a user email agent, even a "good" one. Why do you think so? At least I gave a reason why bouncing

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list [was: ግěcůžላኣዝዩ]

On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 10:58:54AM +0900, John Crawley wrote: [...] > I think "bouncing" is something that should really be done on a server, not > by a user email agent, even a "good" one. Why do you think so? At least I gave a reason why bouncing from the MUA makes sense, and another for why

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list [was: ግěcůžላኣዝዩ]

So when do you plan to stop replying??? On 6/26/2025 6:58 PM, John Crawley wrote: On 26/06/2025 01:00, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 03:18:05PM -, Greg wrote: On 2025-06-24, Greg Wooledge wrote: This like sounds like good and important advice, but how do you "bounce

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list [was: ግěcůžላኣዝዩ]

On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 12:09 AM John Crawley wrote: > > On 26/06/2025 01:00, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 03:18:05PM -, Greg wrote: > >> On 2025-06-24, Greg Wooledge wrote: > >>> > This like sounds like good and important advice, but how do you "bounce > the

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list [was: ግěcůžላኣዝዩ]

On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 11:29:23PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 10:58:54 +0900, John Crawley wrote: > > The Debian Wiki has these suggestions for how to deal with spam: > > https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ListMaster/ListArchiveSpam#nominate > > The fourth option there says:

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list [was: ግěcůžላኣዝዩ]

On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 10:58:54 +0900, John Crawley wrote: > The Debian Wiki has these suggestions for how to deal with spam: > https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ListMaster/ListArchiveSpam#nominate The fourth option there says: * Use your mail client's bounce/resend/redirect functionality to send

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list [was: ግěcůžላኣዝዩ]

On 26/06/2025 01:00, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 03:18:05PM -, Greg wrote: On 2025-06-24, Greg Wooledge wrote: This like sounds like good and important advice, but how do you "bounce the original message"? By using the "bounce" feature of your MUA. Only good ones h

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list [was: ግěcůžላኣዝዩ]

On 2025-06-24, Greg Wooledge wrote: > >> This like sounds like good and important advice, but how do you "bounce the >> original message"? > > By using the "bounce" feature of your MUA. Only good ones have it. > >> Does that mean forward the message to the report-listspam? > > No. Forwarding an

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list [was: ግěcůžላኣዝዩ]

On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 03:18:05PM -, Greg wrote: > On 2025-06-24, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > >> This like sounds like good and important advice, but how do you "bounce the > >> original message"? > > > > By using the "bounce" feature of your MUA. Only good ones have it. > > > >> Does that me

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list [was: ግěcůžላኣዝዩ]

On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 05:44:11PM -0700, Dan Hitt wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 4:50 PM Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 16:33:38 -0700, Dan Hitt wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 3:09 AM wrote: > > > > if you want to do everyone a favour, you bounce the original message

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list [was: ግěcůžላኣዝዩ]

On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 4:50 PM Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 16:33:38 -0700, Dan Hitt wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 3:09 AM wrote: > > > if you want to do everyone a favour, you bounce the original message > > > to to help the list spam team train > > > their filters (I d

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list [was: ግěcůžላኣዝዩ]

On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 16:33:38 -0700, Dan Hitt wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 3:09 AM wrote: > > if you want to do everyone a favour, you bounce the original message > > to to help the list spam team train > > their filters (I did). > This like sounds like good and important advice, but how

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list [was: ግěcůžላኣዝዩ]

On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 04:33:38PM -0700, Dan Hitt wrote: > Hi Tomás, > > This like sounds like good and important advice, but how do you "bounce the > original message"? This is something that your MUA (Mail reader) should do. It will be different for every MUA. I use mutt - that has got a 'bo

Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list [was: ግěcůžላኣዝዩ]

On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 3:09 AM wrote: > > > Please, don't do that. You amplify the spam and incommodate the ~3k > subscribers of this list. Then you top-post and include the full spam > body, to make extra sure everybody has seen it. > > Not good. > > if

Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list [was: ግěcůžላኣዝዩ]

On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 09:45:43AM +0200, 🦓 wrote: > Schick einfach das Geld rüber und verpiss Dich aus geldbefreiten > Kommunistinnenkommunen! Bravo. That must have felt... great for you. Please, don't do that. You amplify the spam and incommodate the ~3k subscribers of this list. T

Community Team: End this thread, please WAS Re: OT- Relativistic mechanics and such

An immediate end to this thread, please. There have been two complaints to the Community Team recently about conduct on this list and, specifically, within this thread. Please stop contributing to this thread immediately. Please do not attempt to revive it. One of the important principles on

please how to migrate ffrom dbus-daemon to dbus-broker

from The default preconfigured Dbus-daemon to Dbus-broker. When I have simply typed as Root. apt install dbus-broker When I have finished The installation, system freezes for several minutes very shortly after The kernel and Initrd have been loaded in To RAM. So I would like to know. Please, is it

Re: Please send more info (Was: Debian-live can not be build missing package)

managed by you in the config directory. Even though you have set the topic as 'solved', I'm willing to take a look at your config directory to see where the issue is coming from. Please send: * Your 'lb config ' command line * The output of 'lb --version'

Re: Debian 12 security issue - please help to understand

ra...@siliconet.pl wrote: > >On 29.01.2025 4:16 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: >> Yes, it still means that. The minizip binary package you are seeing >> comes from a different source package, also called minizip: >> >> https://packages.debian.org/source/bookworm/minizip > >Aha! Got it :-) > >And th

Re: Debian 12 security issue - please help to understand

On 29.01.2025 4:16 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: Yes, it still means that. The minizip binary package you are seeing comes from a different source package, also called minizip: https://packages.debian.org/source/bookworm/minizip Aha! Got it :-) And there are no binary components in Debian b

Re: Debian 12 security issue - please help to understand

On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 04:15:16PM +0100, Rafał Lichwała wrote: > >But still don;t understand "Debian itself does *not* build the affected >component" as I can find "minizip" (and maybe other) package based on that >vulnerable library - see my previous post above as Re- to Hanno. > Yo

Re: Debian 12 security issue - please help to understand

On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 04:04:26PM +0100, Rafał Lichwała wrote: > > On 29.01.2025 3:35 PM, Hanno 'Rince' Wagner wrote: > > > The notes say: > > > [bookworm] - zlib (contrib/minizip not built and src:zlib not > > > producing binary packages) > > > In other words, there's no point in fixing it bec

Re: Debian 12 security issue - please help to understand

On 29.01.2025 3:30 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 03:22:02PM +0100, Rafał Lichwała wrote: On 29.01.2025 2:43 PM, Dan Ritter wrote: CVSS are often bogus. Hmmm... I'm not sure what you mean. All security announcements in DSAs are referring to CVSS, so... what's

Re: Debian 12 security issue - please help to understand

On 29.01.2025 3:35 PM, Hanno 'Rince' Wagner wrote: The notes say: [bookworm] - zlib (contrib/minizip not built and src:zlib not producing binary packages) In other words, there's no point in fixing it because Debian doesn't build the vulnerable binary component. Very low priority. so, this

Re: Debian 12 security issue - please help to understand

y "language side-effect" >;-) > >I sent the links, but it seems I don't fully understand them, so I ask for >explanation. > >Then you cite some parts form that links in plain text, so I guess you >understand them better and (again - I guess

Re: Debian 12 security issue - please help to understand

On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 08:43:12AM -0500, Dan Ritter wrote: > > Most recently: https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2025/01/23/cvss-is-dead-to-us/ I was going to post a link to this very article when I saw that you already had :-) Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez

Re: Debian 12 security issue - please help to understand

ss) you fully agree with those statements. So could you please explain me what's wrong with my understanding? Best regards, Rafal

Re: Debian 12 security issue - please help to understand

r against a CVE. but what it means _in your situation_ is your responsibility, not debians, not the scanners. Yes. But I'm not asking for "responsibility", but a bit more explanation without blaming anyone. I'm not asking: "who is responsible for that, this package is not

Re: Debian 12 security issue - please help to understand

because Debian > > doesn't build the vulnerable binary component. > > > > Very low priority. > > Could you please drop a link to those notes? It's in the links that you sent. > If CVSS is "critical" and Debian tracking system says "bookworm

Re: Debian 12 security issue - please help to understand

e real critical security vulnerabilities in bookworm which are not fixed. Am I wrong? Please correct me then. Because Debian does backport security fixes, so simply checking the version number of the software does not indicate if the vulnerability has been fixed in Debian, or not. I know, but it seems (a

Re: Debian 12 security issue - please help to understand

On 29.01.2025 2:12 PM, Dan Ritter wrote: The notes say: [bookworm] - zlib (contrib/minizip not built and src:zlib not producing binary packages) In other words, there's no point in fixing it because Debian doesn't build the vulnerable binary component. Very low priority. Could

Re: Debian 12 security issue - please help to understand

Rafał Lichwała wrote: > Hi, > > I've prepared some docker image based on Debian 12 (bookworm, fully updated) > and after upload it to local registry it has been automatically scanned for > possible vulnerabilities. > Then I was really surprised when discovered that according to this scan > there

Re: Debian 12 security issue - please help to understand

On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 at 12:40, Rafał Lichwała wrote: > I've prepared some docker image based on Debian 12 (bookworm, fully > updated) and after upload it to local registry it has been automatically > scanned for possible vulnerabilities. > Then I was really surprised when discovered that according

Debian 12 security issue - please help to understand

om these information above? Similar problem in second critical on the list: package "libaom3" which is a binary package from "aom": https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/aom https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/aom https://www.cvedetails.com/cve/CVE-2023-6879/ Please help me to understand :-) Best regards, Rafal

Re: Can someone explain containers, pods, docker, etc. please

Anssi Saari wrote: > Chris Green writes: > > > But there is no Python 2 available for Debian 12... > > That's just what's in the package manager. Python source code is > available and from that any Python version can be built. Pyenv is a tool > which makes that easy. It's not just Python 2, it

Re: Can someone explain containers, pods, docker, etc. please

Chris Green writes: > But there is no Python 2 available for Debian 12... That's just what's in the package manager. Python source code is available and from that any Python version can be built. Pyenv is a tool which makes that easy.

Re: Can someone explain containers, pods, docker, etc. please

Florent Rougon wrote: > Hi, > > Le 09/11/2024, Charles Curley a écrit: > > > I know zilch about pythin, so this is a shot in the dark. While working > > on something else, I cam across the package python3-lib2to3. Might that > > be of use? > > No, 2to3 is for converting Python code, however Ch

Re: Can someone explain containers, pods, docker, etc. please

Hi, Le 09/11/2024, Charles Curley a écrit: > I know zilch about pythin, so this is a shot in the dark. While working > on something else, I cam across the package python3-lib2to3. Might that > be of use? No, 2to3 is for converting Python code, however Chris' real problem was with a C extension

Re: Can someone explain containers, pods, docker, etc. please

On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:57:37 + Chris Green wrote: > Basically yes, what makes it impossiblr to migrate to Python3 is that > there is a .so file which is a python package built for Python 2, > otherwise I would be quite happy to convert it all to Python 3. I know zilch about pythin, so this is

Re: Can someone explain containers, pods, docker, etc. please

On 2024-11-09 15:27, Chris Green wrote: But there is no Python 2 available for Debian 12 so it's not available for these tools to use. They can only switch between Python versions that exist! It is a while back, but I have managed to compile my own cpython without too many problems in the pa

Re: Can someone explain containers, pods, docker, etc. please

songbird wrote: > Lists wrote: > > On 2024-11-08 16:51, Chris Green wrote: > > > >> Well, yes, it sounds like it doesn't it. However, apparently, there > >> are various things that prevent one from creating a python 2.x virtual > >> environment on a system that has only Python 3. > > > > Not to be

Re: Can someone explain containers, pods, docker, etc. please

Lists wrote: > On 2024-11-08 16:51, Chris Green wrote: > >> Well, yes, it sounds like it doesn't it. However, apparently, there >> are various things that prevent one from creating a python 2.x virtual >> environment on a system that has only Python 3. > > Not to be a bother, but did you look into

Re: Can someone explain containers, pods, docker, etc. please

On 2024-11-08 16:51, Chris Green wrote: Well, yes, it sounds like it doesn't it. However, apparently, there are various things that prevent one from creating a python 2.x virtual environment on a system that has only Python 3. Not to be a bother, but did you look into pyenv en pyenv-installer?

Re: Can someone explain containers, pods, docker, etc. please

On 2024-11-08 16:51, Chris Green wrote: I am just a novice with Python (migrating from perl, which I have programmed in for more than 25 years), but wouldn't a Python Virtual Environment (venv) be just the thing for this? I've been tinkering with that in pycharm and it seems like it could do wha

Re: Can someone explain containers, pods, docker, etc. please

Lists wrote: > On 2024-11-08 13:57, Chris Green wrote: > > songbird wrote: > >> Chris Green wrote: > >>> songbird wrote: > Chris Green wrote: > ... > > i haven't needed them and also haven't gotten into > them. > > > > I'm particularly interested in a wa

Re: Can someone explain containers, pods, docker, etc. please

Florent Rougon wrote: > Hi, > > Le 08/11/2024, Chris Green a écrit: > > > No use at all! :-) It's a scanner applet to drive my OKI scanner and > > I want the output to end up on my working system where I will use it > > in E-Mail or whatever. > > Does gscan2pdf not fulfill your needs? I'm not

Re: Can someone explain containers, pods, docker, etc. please

On 2024-11-08 13:57, Chris Green wrote: songbird wrote: Chris Green wrote: songbird wrote: Chris Green wrote: ... i haven't needed them and also haven't gotten into them. I'm particularly interested in a way to run (say) Debian Bullseye within my Debian Bookworm system. I'm looking f

Re: Can someone explain containers, pods, docker, etc. please

Hi, Le 08/11/2024, Chris Green a écrit: > No use at all! :-) It's a scanner applet to drive my OKI scanner and > I want the output to end up on my working system where I will use it > in E-Mail or whatever. Does gscan2pdf not fulfill your needs? I'm not a big fan of Perl in general, but this i

Re: Can someone explain containers, pods, docker, etc. please

songbird wrote: > Chris Green wrote: > > songbird wrote: > >> Chris Green wrote: > >> ... > >> > >> i haven't needed them and also haven't gotten into > >> them. > >> > >> > >> > I'm particularly interested in a way to run (say) Debian Bullseye > >> > within my Debian Bookworm system. I'm l

Re: Can someone explain containers, pods, docker, etc. please

Chris Green wrote: > songbird wrote: >> Chris Green wrote: >> ... >> >> i haven't needed them and also haven't gotten into >> them. >> >> >> > I'm particularly interested in a way to run (say) Debian Bullseye >> > within my Debian Bookworm system. I'm looking for something slightly >> > 'lig

Re: Can someone explain containers, pods, docker, etc. please

songbird wrote: > Chris Green wrote: > ... > > i haven't needed them and also haven't gotten into > them. > > > > I'm particularly interested in a way to run (say) Debian Bullseye > > within my Debian Bookworm system. I'm looking for something slightly > > 'lighter weight' than a full-blown

Re: Can someone explain containers, pods, docker, etc. please

Chris Green wrote: ... i haven't needed them and also haven't gotten into them. > I'm particularly interested in a way to run (say) Debian Bullseye > within my Debian Bookworm system. I'm looking for something slightly > 'lighter weight' than a full-blown virtual machine like virtualbox > tho

Re: Can someone explain containers, pods, docker, etc. please

On Thu, Nov 7, 2024, 3:53 PM Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote: > On Thursday 07 November 2024 08:19:55 am Chris Green wrote: > > I'm trying to get my mind round the various ways of wrapping/isolating > > collections of code and programs in Debian (well in any Linux I > > suppose) and I'm really not und

Re: Can someone explain containers, pods, docker, etc. please

On Thursday 07 November 2024 08:19:55 am Chris Green wrote: > I'm trying to get my mind round the various ways of wrapping/isolating > collections of code and programs in Debian (well in any Linux I > suppose) and I'm really not understanding them very well.  When you go > to the home of any partic

Re: Can someone explain containers, pods, docker, etc. please

On 11/7/24 14:19, Chris Green wrote: I'm particularly interested in a way to run (say) Debian Bullseye within my Debian Bookworm system. I'm looking for something slightly 'lighter weight' than a full-blown virtual machine like virtualbox though I guess I can use virtualbox if I have to. I do

Re: Can someone explain containers, pods, docker, etc. please

Chris Green wrote: > Todd Zullinger wrote: > > [-- text/plain, encoding quoted-printable, charset: us-ascii, 25 > > lines --] > > > > Chris Green wrote: > > > I'm trying to get my mind round the various ways of > > > wrapping/isolating collections of code and programs in Debian > > > (well in

Re: Can someone explain containers, pods, docker, etc. please

Todd Zullinger wrote: > [-- text/plain, encoding quoted-printable, charset: us-ascii, 25 lines --] > > Chris Green wrote: > > I'm trying to get my mind round the various ways of wrapping/isolating > > collections of code and programs in Debian (well in any Linux I > > suppose) and I'm really not

Re: Can someone explain containers, pods, docker, etc. please

Chris Green wrote: > I'm trying to get my mind round the various ways of wrapping/isolating > collections of code and programs in Debian (well in any Linux I > suppose) and I'm really not understanding them very well. When you go > to the home of any particular one it seems to think you know what

Can someone explain containers, pods, docker, etc. please

I'm trying to get my mind round the various ways of wrapping/isolating collections of code and programs in Debian (well in any Linux I suppose) and I'm really not understanding them very well. When you go to the home of any particular one it seems to think you know what it is already and thus goes

Re: Clarity in information, please :) [WAS Re: need .md reader that canprint ONLY tha page being viewed]

ian meet expenses but the only path you offer is paypal, and they owe me money I'll never collect, so I do no business with paypal. That is YOUR problem. I get along just fine w/o them. . Cheers, Gene Heskett, CET. -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ball

Clarity in information, please :) [WAS Re: need .md reader that can print ONLY tha page being viewed]

On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 03:05:32AM -0400, gene heskett wrote: > > . > I've got a gui on both ends of the net but cups on armbian can't see the > printers shared by debian/bookworm. So we fix that first. If we can... > > Cheers, Gene Heskett, CET. > -- > Hi Gene, Armbian is off-topic here (as of

Re: please help app missing ...

find in the repos is gimp-help etc. Please reply back. thanks Sincerely, nicky

Re: please help app missing ...

On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 15:46:56 -0600 Charles Curley wrote: Hello Charles, >The original poster specified Debian 12, not testing. Wherefore the >following is dangerous advice. If they installed 12, gimp is available, unless the install they did left only the install media as repo. If they really

Re: please help app missing ...

rsday, 26-09-2024 at 06:41 Xiyue Deng wrote: > > > Joe writes: > >> On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 19:26:07 + >> memorysticky wrote: >> >>> Hello, I recently did a wipe and reinstalled Debian 12. >>> One issue I'm having is, I can no longer install gim

Re: please help app missing ...

Charles Curley writes: > On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 13:41:52 -0700 > Xiyue Deng wrote: > >> Gimp was removed from testing on 2024-09-25[1] due to the ongoing >> transition. See [2] for more details. > > The original poster specified Debian 12, not testing. Wherefore the > following is dangerous advice

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >