Greg (HE12025-06-27): > It is not the accepted meaning of the term. Did you not already tell that? Was not Greg Wooledge precisely replying to that?
-- Nicolas George
- Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list [w... Greg Wooledge
- Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on li... Alain D D Williams
- Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on li... Greg
- Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on li... Nicolas George
- Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on li... Greg
- Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on li... Alain D D Williams
- Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on li... Nicolas George
- Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on li... Charles Curley
- Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on li... Greg Wooledge
- Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on li... Greg
- Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on li... Nicolas George
- Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on li... Jeffrey Walton
- Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on li... John Crawley
- Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on li... Stephan Seitz
- Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on li... tomas
- Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on li... Nicolas George
- Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list [w... Jeffrey Walton
- Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list [w... Thomas Dineen
- Re: Please, don't reply to spam -- much less on list [w... tomas
