On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 11:29:23PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 10:58:54 +0900, John Crawley wrote:
> > The Debian Wiki has these suggestions for how to deal with spam:
> > https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ListMaster/ListArchiveSpam#nominate
> 
> The fourth option there says:
> 
>  * Use your mail client's bounce/resend/redirect functionality to send
>    the spam messages to report-lists...@lists.debian.org
> 
> > So it looks as if resending a spam message to 
> > report-lists...@lists.debian.org is OK, although "bouncing" the message 
> > back to the server is very much not, even if your MUA can do that.
> 
> I'm pretty sure the wiki says it's OK.  I cited it right up there.
> 
> To be clear, what we're talking about here is what mutt does when you
> press the "b" key.  It queues up a message for delivery, where the
> envelope recipient address is one that you specify by typing it in,
> and the entire message (header + body) is exactly what you received,
> with no modifications made by the MUA.

I have just tried this, re-sending the message to which I am replying to myself.
I do see some differences to the header, some of which will be my local MTA
(exim) but I think that those added by mutt are: Resent-From: Resent-Date:
Resent-Message-ID: Resent-To:  If Resent-From: the message might not be
delivered due to SPF issues.

2,3c2,3
< From bounce-debian-user=addw=phcomp.co...@lists.debian.org Fri Jun 27 
04:30:24 2025
< Return-path: <bounce-debian-user=addw=phcomp.co...@lists.debian.org>
---
> From a...@phcomp.co.uk Fri Jun 27 04:32:28 2025
> Return-path: <a...@phcomp.co.uk>
5c5,14
< Delivery-date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 04:30:24 +0100
---
> Delivery-date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 04:32:28 +0100
> Received: from addw by mint.phcomp.co.uk with local (Exim 4.96)
>       (envelope-from <a...@phcomp.co.uk>)
>       id 1uUzpD-00Ewy0-32
>       for a...@phcomp.co.uk;
>       Fri, 27 Jun 2025 04:32:28 +0100
> Resent-From: Alain D D Williams <a...@phcomp.co.uk>
> Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 04:32:27 +0100
> Resent-Message-ID: <af4qy7mlkaw3k...@phcomp.co.uk>
> Resent-To: Alain Williams <a...@phcomp.co.uk>
25d33
< Delivered-To: lists-debian-u...@bendel.debian.org
82d89
< Status: RO


> Mutt calls this action "bounce", but I would not use the phrase "back
> to the server" to describe it.  It's more like a forwarding action,
> because you're passing the message along to a new recipient.
> 

-- 
Alain Williams
Linux/GNU Consultant - Mail systems, Web sites, Networking, Programmer, IT 
Lecturer.
+44 (0) 787 668 0256  https://www.phcomp.co.uk/
Parliament Hill Computers. Registration Information: 
https://www.phcomp.co.uk/Contact.html
#include <std_disclaimer.h>

Reply via email to