de/~bunk/kernel-24.html .
Also, get a _recent_ 2.4.x kernel. 2.4.0-test11 is truely ancient, and tons
of bugs have been fixed since.
HTH,
Ray
--
Obsig: developing a new sig
hi folks,
I've been trying to get the mentioned kernel to run on my machine (potato
2.2r2).
I've tried it the debian way (make-kpkg,...) and the normal way (make dep,
...).
I always end up with the kernel properly installed, all modules created, BUT
the file /lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/modules.d
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Lindsay Allen wrote:
> > >You need the modutils in testing/unstable. The version in potato is too
> > >old, as the layout of modules in /lib/modules has changed since then.
> > >The newer modutils is compiled against a newer glibc, so you might have
> > >to build it from source
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Colin Watson wrote:
> >You need the modutils in testing/unstable. The version in potato is too
> >old, as the layout of modules in /lib/modules has changed since then.
> >The newer modutils is compiled against a newer glibc, so you might have
> >to build it from source.
>
> Ac
I get these messages in my kernel log all the time:
kernel: reset_xmit_timer sk=ef9e3360 1 when=0x2f40, caller
=c0218172
What does it mean?
-Vibol
Joris Lambrecht wrote:
>
> Did you follow procedure while building the kernel ? Maybe you have some
> problem there ?
Umm, what special procedure is there to compiling a kernel anyway? I
configured it with `make menuconfig` compiled it with `make-kpkg clean
&& make-kpkg kernel_image` and install
Did you follow procedure while building the kernel ? Maybe you have some
problem there ?
-Original Message-
From: Viktor Rosenfeld [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 2:32 PM
To: Joris Lambrecht
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.4.0 vs 3Com NIC
Joris Lambrecht wrote:
>
> out on a limb here but ... if you compiled 2.4.0 with support for your nic
> selected would it not be normal for the module to fail ?
Yeah probably. I tried to `modprobe` into a kernel, that has the driver
compiled-in (but won't recognize the NIC anyway), but the erro
]
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 11:11 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Kernel 2.4.0 vs 3Com NIC
Hi,
okay I have compiled and installed the new kernel on my woody system.
The compile went without problems and the kernel boots up with no error
messages (at least if I don't mount
cognize my network card though. I have a 3Com
Etherlink III card, which is supported by the 3c509 driver. I have it
compiled-in with kernel 2.2.18 and I've never had problems before. It
won't work with kernel 2.4.0 though, when I have it compiled-in. When I
compile it as a module and t
Hi,
Do any of you have problems with kernel 2.4.0 and rpc.quotad? I compiled
Quota support into the kernel, and everything else seems to work fine, but
rpc.quotad locks when it tries to load (just sits there after executing it).
--
Vibol Hou
http://khmer.cc
I still cannot boot kernel 2.4.0 on my ThinkPad 560. I can boot the
old kernel, 2.2.16.
I installed a 2.4.0 custom kernel and perhaps I am missing some
important option I don't know about.
Is anyone else using the new kernel on a ThinkPad and if so, what did
you have to do differently tha
Stefan Nobis wrote:
>
> Stefan Nobis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I installed Kernel 2.4 on Debian Potato (2.2.r2). Some packages from
> > unstable
> > are needed to do so and i compiled all from source for a Debian 2.2r2
> > system. Here are the recompiled packages (apt-get-able):
> >
> >
Stefan Nobis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I installed Kernel 2.4 on Debian Potato (2.2.r2). Some packages from unstable
> are needed to do so and i compiled all from source for a Debian 2.2r2
> system. Here are the recompiled packages (apt-get-able):
>
> deb http://www.snobis.de/debian extras/ke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin Watson) wrote:
>Michael Madden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>I've got 2 Debian 2.2 R2 systems. One has a NE2000 ISA NIC, and the
>>other one has a 3Com 3C509 ISA card. I've recently updated the kernel
>>to 2.4.0, and I'm having a great deal of trouble getting the network
>>
Michael Madden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've got 2 Debian 2.2 R2 systems. One has a NE2000 ISA NIC, and the
>other one has a 3Com 3C509 ISA card. I've recently updated the kernel
>to 2.4.0, and I'm having a great deal of trouble getting the network
>cards working. When it is booting up I get e
Hi.
I installed Kernel 2.4 on Debian Potato (2.2.r2). Some packages from unstable
are needed to do so and i compiled all from source for a Debian 2.2r2
system. Here are the recompiled packages (apt-get-able):
deb http://www.snobis.de/debian extras/kernel24/
Have fun with it.
--
Until the next
I've got 3c509 cards (ISA) in 2 486's and neither have MCA support
compiled in or built as modules, just the 3c509 driver compiled in.
-casey
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Sebastiaan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> no, I have compiled the 2.4.0 kernel without any probelms and both my
> 3c509 cards worked perfectly. Ha
Hi,
no, I have compiled the 2.4.0 kernel without any probelms and both my
3c509 cards worked perfectly. Have you compiled the MCA stuff? This is
needed by this card.
Greetz,
Sebastiaan
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Michael Madden wrote:
> I've got 2 Debian 2.2 R2 systems. One has a NE2000
> ISA
> NIC,
I had the same problem with my 3c905b. what i ended up doing was upgrading the
modutils (i was running potato b4) to the
"unstable" version. then i re-make modules and re-make modules_install. once
i did this, i had to add the compiled mods to
/etc/modules. If there is an easier way, let me k
I've got 2 Debian 2.2 R2 systems. One has a NE2000
ISA
NIC, and the other one has a 3Com 3C509 ISA card.
I've
recently updated the kernel to 2.4.0, and I'm having a
great deal of trouble getting the network cards
working. When it is booting up I get errors
indicating
the device /dev/eth0 doesn'
rutsch/modutils_2.3.22-1_i386.deb. There is
also a iptables .deb for potato at
http://tux.creighton.edu/~pbrutsch/iptables_1.1.2-1.0_i386.deb.
The ipmasq package is obsolete for kernel 2.4.0 - the iptables command
takes the place of the kernel 2.2 ipchains and ipmasqadm commands.
> Is there a
dkopie:Martin Tanzer/dvs/DE
Thema: Kernel 2.4.0 support for potato 2.2r2
Hello,
I've compiled 2.4.0 on my potato firewall, and it seems to be booting
nicely. However, there seems to be some issues with the location of the
kernel modules. I'm sure that there are other issues like
be some issues with the location of the
> kernel modules. I'm sure that there are other issues like the support for
> netfilter and the reconfiguration of the ipmasq package for that.
>
> Is there anybody that has taken the task of figuring out everything that
> needs to be
that.
Is there anybody that has taken the task of figuring out everything that
needs to be done in order to support kernel 2.4.0 on potato?
-=Francois=-
* Anthony Fox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010106 16:26]:
> After compiling and running a 2.4.0 kernel, I can no longer play
> audio cds. I can mount data cds just fine, but not audio cds. If I
> try to mount an audio cd I get the following error:
You don't mount audio CDs. Just stick 'em in and play..
On January 6, 2001 11:29 am, Anthony Fox wrote:
> After compiling and running a 2.4.0 kernel, I can no longer play
> audio cds. I can mount data cds just fine, but not audio cds. If I
> try to mount an audio cd I get the following error:
> Has anyone seen this problem or does anyone know what t
After compiling and running a 2.4.0 kernel, I can no longer play
audio cds. I can mount data cds just fine, but not audio cds. If I
try to mount an audio cd I get the following error:
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/cdrom,
or too many mounted file systems
and the
Dear All,
If someone sometime got the problem with new 2.4 kernel?
If standard Potato NFS client has 2.4.0 kernel and updated
util-linux/mount 2.10q then it is not possible to mount NFS share from
Debian 2.2 with kernel 2.2.17. With old util-linux/mount 2.10f this works
just with warning about o
Well, I got to the end, I made my boot floppy as usual -I have Debian
installed in a second hard drive, so i find easier to boot from floppy-,
rebooted, but after the line
OK, booting the kernel
(or so, don't remember exactly), the system froze. Any ideas about
what's wrong?
Ethan Benson wrote:
Pollywog wrote:
>
> kernel 2.4.0 is now available; I am downloading it now.
> Try it and see if you still have problems. I had problems with
> test12 also.
>
> ftp.kernel.org
>
> --
> Andrew
>
OK thanks, the kernel works fine, including modutils.
Actually it s
"Noah L. Meyerhans" wrote:
> It doesn't appear you know kernel-package as well as you thought. You
> merely need to assign the package an epoch, and apt-get/dselect won't
> try to overwrite it. A version number like 3:1.0 or something works
> just fine and won't be replaced by anything debian re
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 06:53:37PM -0800, Nate Amsden wrote:
> now that ive learned that [EMAIL PROTECTED] kernel-package
> i do
>
> make menuconfig ; make-kpkg clean ; make-kpkg
> --revision=10.0++ binary
> e.g
> make-kpkg --revision=10.0+ow1+ide+lm_sensors+ipsec
>
> sometimes i do revision of 2
ack to
> number 1. above?
>
> Ethan Benson wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 07:23:06PM -0500, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> > > Kernel 2.4.0 was declared stable yesterday I believe, a couple of
> > > questions:
> > > 1. How long it usually takes before we h
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 07:23:06PM -0500, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> Kernel 2.4.0 was declared stable yesterday I believe, a couple of
> questions:
> 1. How long it usually takes before we have a kernel-source?
Probably not long.
> 2. Can we use make-kpkg (kernel package) with the
07:23:06PM -0500, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> > Kernel 2.4.0 was declared stable yesterday I believe, a couple of
> > questions:
> > 1. How long it usually takes before we have a kernel-source?
> > 2. Can we use make-kpkg (kernel package) with the linux-2.4.0.tar.gz
> >
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 07:23:06PM -0500, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> Kernel 2.4.0 was declared stable yesterday I believe, a couple of
> questions:
> 1. How long it usually takes before we have a kernel-source?
> 2. Can we use make-kpkg (kernel package) with the linux-2.4.0.tar
Kernel 2.4.0 was declared stable yesterday I believe, a couple of
questions:
1. How long it usually takes before we have a kernel-source?
2. Can we use make-kpkg (kernel package) with the linux-2.4.0.tar.gz
(after unpacking, of course)? If so, what would the procedure be?
See at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/
Romain Lerallut wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm using kernel 2.4.0-test12.
> I need to compile the drivers for my nvidia card and they call
> "get_module_symbol" and "put_module_symbol" which I ca
Hello everyone,
I'm using kernel 2.4.0-test12.
I need to compile the drivers for my nvidia card and they call
"get_module_symbol" and "put_module_symbol" which I cannot find.
I did a quick search on the web but I found nothing about test12...
If anyone could tell me h
Hi all..
Just curious if there is something different with the latest test kernel? I was
running test10 and decided to try out test12 with a fresh potato -> woody
install. I've compiled many kernels, but this latest time I have run into a
little snag. Seems my modules do not work. I have done a
I worked out what the problem was. I omitted to select one of the
necessary options when I was compiling the kernel. I needed to select
the PPP_ASYNC option or something like that.
Now it all works fine.
Cheers,
Mark.
Rino Mardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 12:59:28AM +
I have recently compiled a 2.4.0-test11 kernel. I am using it with a
mainly potato distribution. However, in order to get things working I
have needed to upgrade to a number of woody packages. In particular,
I have upgraded util-linux, modutils, e2fsprogs and ppp.
When I try to use pon to start
Is there a rescue disk for kernel 2.4.0 yet? If not, is it possible to
"roll your own"? How hard is it?
Thanks,
Mark.
_/___/~~
/~~_/~~__/~~__Mark_Phillips
/~~_/[EMAIL
Hi there,
today I noticed for the first time several of this messages in my syslog.
Anyone know what this means?
Obviously this is NOT something like "Message repeated times" which is
used by syslog to conserve space in the logs and make logs easier to read.
Thanks,
Ralf
--
Sign the EU pe
msg.pgp
Description: PGP message
Branden!).
> >>
> >> My hardware is a Matrox G400 video card and an Abit KT7-RAID motherboard.
> >> If it would be helpful to see either my kernel configuration or X
> >> configuration or both, I'll be glad to provide them.
>
> > Exactly the sam
would be helpful to see either my kernel configuration or X
>> configuration or both, I'll be glad to provide them.
> Exactly the same here with XFree86 4.0.1-3 and kernel 2.4.0-test9 on Woody.
> Also my system runs with a Matrox card (Mystique 220) and works perfectly
> with kernel 2.2.17.
msg.pgp
Description: PGP message
Anybody else having trouble with this combination? While running
2.4.0-test10, startx hangs after showing a plain gray screen sometime
before completing successfully. At that point the system reponds to
neither Ctrl-Alt-Backspace nor Ctrl-Alt-Fn, so I hit the reset button.
Note that the exact sa
Dear all!
I've downloaded the 2.4.0 test 9 sources, and have configured
the compile options using make menuconfig, then a
make-kpkg clean, followed by make-kpkg --revision=custom_0.1 kernel_image
and then dpkg -i kernel-image...
However, when dpkg is installing, I get an unresolved symbols on ev
At 07:57 10/10/00, David S. Miller wrote:
echo "0" >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn
Yes, Cisco does know about the bug in their product.
.. and has a fix.
this is marked as cisco bug id CSCds23698.
(see http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/Bugtool/onebug.pl?bugid=CSCds23698)
Bud ID:CSCd
FAQ, echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn
-d
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> Hi all,
> I finished a fresh debian installation (woody) with kernel 2.4.0-test9
> (tested
> in various configurations) and 2.2.17 + pcmcia (latest release)
>
> All the installation is on
echo "0" >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn
Yes, Cisco does know about the bug in their product.
Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com
Hi all,
I finished a fresh debian installation (woody) with kernel 2.4.0-test9
(tested
in various configurations) and 2.2.17 + pcmcia (latest release)
All the installation is on a laptop with pcmcia support enable for my 2
eth's.
The situation of my network is like this:
box
Get an uptodate rtl8139 driver and the reboots will disappear:
http://gtf.org/garzik/drivers/8139too
(A friend declined to take my advice and buy Intel PRO/100's, and he paid
the price you're paying right now. )
--
Bob Bernstein
at
Esmond, R.I., USA
(I know I should probably ask this on one of the kernel mailing lists,
but you folks are nicer, and smarter. Please CC me if you reply to
this, because the list server won't seem to let me resubscribe right
now.)
I have one old Debian box running up-to-date Woody with kernel 2.4.0-test6.
I
modconf will not work at all so if you rely on it to select boot-time
modules, you are going to have to edit the modules files by hand. Note
that modprope works fine ... just the Debian modconf script can not handle
the structure of the new /lib/modules/`uname -r` directory in 2.4
Otherwise ...
Hi all,
does the 2.4 kernel will work without problems on potato?
I think modutils should be updated and some other things from woody,
though. Isn't it ?
Thanks!
--
Do you really think win is easy to use?
---
Juli-Manel Merino Vidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 10-Sep-2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I upgraded from potato to woody and installed the newest kernel.
> However, when I boot with the new kernel, it locks up when it tries to
> start inetd. If I boot with the old kernel, everything loads
> perfectly. Does anyone know what this could be?
Th
I upgraded from potato to woody and installed the newest kernel.
However, when I boot with the new kernel, it locks up when it tries to
start inetd. If I boot with the old kernel, everything loads
perfectly. Does anyone know what this could be?
luke
I upgraded from potato to woody and installed the newest kernel.
However, when I boot from the new kernel, it locks up when it tries
to start inetd. If I try to boot the old kernel, there are no
problems. Does anyone know what this could be?
luke
On 05-Sep-2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi !
>
> Does anyone know a firewall running under Debian/woody with
> Kernel 2.4.0-test6 ?
iptables
--
Andrew
Hi !
Does anyone know a firewall running under Debian/woody with
Kernel 2.4.0-test6 ?
cu
mik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I have installed the latest 2.4 test kernel on a couple of my potato
systems, which seems to run just fine. After upgrading modutils via an
apt-get source from woody I can load the modules using modprobe without
any trouble.
However, modconf isn't finding all t
Hi
I know it's the bleeding edge and maybe I should stay away but anyway I
wanted the support for my on-board sound card (and yes it works).
I've read that the new netfilter method should be able to operate in a
backward compatibility mode with ipchains - however I can not get it to
work. I've tr
66 matches
Mail list logo
